5
maj
Seneste opdatering: 29/4-12 kl. 2125
5 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

Ekstremister holder topmøde i København, uantastede, ubemærket, uden protester
Hvornår er for meget for meget? Hvornår overtrumfer national og personlig overlevelse ‘anstændigheden’ og ‘forsamlingsfriheden’? I skrivende stund har ingen danske medier fundet historien værd at gengive. En svensk blog kunne fortælle om mødet i Brønbyhallen lørdag, en amerikansk allerede torsdag d. 1 maj. Hvad skylder vi danske journalisters diskretion ?

It is interesting to note that CAIR director Nihad Awad will soon be sharing center stage in a major conference with Mohammad Akram al-Adlouni, the probable author of the most damning documents made public during the Holy Land Foundation trial.

The conference in Denmark, heavily populated with Muslim Brotherhood figures, is, according the program, to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the Nakbah or catastrophe, as they refer to the founding of the state of Israel.The joint attendance of Awad and al Adlouni, now head of the al Quds Foundation in Lebanon, was first noted by the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report.The GMBDR further noted that:

The Palestinian Return Centre in London, characterized by sources in London as close to Hamas, has Trustees that have also been on the board of the Muslim Association of Britain, one of the Muslim Brotherhood organizations in the U.K. The Centre itself has been widely promoted by the U.K Brotherhood. CAIR, in turn, had its origins in the Hamas support infrastructure in the U.S.

So, the old gang is getting together again, in the service of the Muslim Brotherhood and its armed wing, Hamas.

It was al-Adlouni who penned the famous “On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,” referring to Muslim Brotherhood organizations, including those in which Awad has been active. CAIR was formed later, but comes from the same family of organizations linked to the Ikhwan.

As I wrote in the analysis for the NEFA Foundation, “In the document, the author is strikingly clear
about the ultimate goal of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.” The document stated that:

The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.

I will repeat a bit more of the paper here, because it is important to see where this group’s true agenda lies, as these old allies and others of their ideological and theological persuasion meet again, with an agenda largely unchanged from what they articulated 17 years ago and have never renounced:

In order to establish his authority in the Explanatory Memorandum, Adlouni states that his authority is derived from the 1987Shura Council and Organizational Conference of 1987, the highest governing bodies of the Brotherhood in the United States. To claim this authority he quotes the group’s agreed goals from that conference, including:

“Enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims’ causes domestically and globally, and which works to expand the observant Muslim base, aims at unifying and directing Muslims’ efforts, presents Islam as a civilization alternative, and supports the global Islamic state wherever it is.”

After going into some detail in establishing the relevance and authority of his missive, Adlouni spends considerable time on the fundamental concept of settlement, central to the Muslim Brotherhood-led efforts in North America. He describes settlement as necessary so “That Islam and its Movement become a part of the homeland it lives in.”

The process of settlement isalso defined as follows:

“In order for Islam and its Movement to become “a part of the homeland” in which it lives, “stable” in its land, “rooted” in the spirits and minds of its people, “enabled” in the live of its society and has firmly established “organizations” on which the Islamic structure is built and with which the testimony of civilization is achieved, the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain “the keys” and the tools of this process in carry out this grand mission as a “Civilization Jihadist” responsibility which lies on the shoulders of Muslims and – on top of them – the Muslim Brotherhood in this country…[mine fremhævelser, LFPC]

Muslim Brotherhood Cronies Getting Together in Denmark, The Palestinia Return Center – deltagerliste & An Interesting Pairing at a Muslim Brotherhood Conference

Rablende vanvid. I søvngængergang på vej til slagtebænken, forvisset om egen godhed fordi man har vist sin rituelle modstand mod Dansk Folkeparti, lader man dette passere, og det på en 5. maj (LFPC).

»Jeg er en fremmed i mit land«

“Regarding Sweden: I’m an alien here. I have denounced this country (the sinking ship). My relation to the indigenous people is the one of an anthropologist. I will stay a couple of years more for participant observations. The Sweden that existed when I was young is already gone. It hasn’t become manifest yet, but it has already happened…………..While I’m mourning that this culture had to disappear, it seems clear to me that Swedish culture was just as destined to disappear as the Inca culture.”

Mourning the Disappearance of a Culture

Fatwa fotos : Kurator rimer på kryster

For the third time in four months, the controversial work of an Iranian artist has been suddenly yanked from a Dutch museum exhibition.
The artist, who goes by the alias Sooreh Hera and who lives in exile in the Netherlands, said she received death threats after attempting to show her series of photographs entitled “Adam & Ewald, Seventh-Day Lovers.”
“Freedom of expression has become an illusion in Europe,” she told FOXNews in a phone interview from a home where she is currently in hiding. “We think we have freedom of expression, but in fact we live under a sort of hidden censorship.”

“I will not be attending [Art Amsterdam] due to safety reasons,” she said. “It’s like being forbidden to go to your own wedding.”
She said her work is a direct response to the threats made by radical Islamists against her and against the Dutch government.
“I did this to answer the Iranian government,” Hera said. “I made some new work. In one of these photos the deceased spiritual leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, is in leather trousers, half naked.”
She says the point of this is to expose the hypocrisy in Islam about homosexuality and to get everyone talking about the freedom of expression and speech in the Western world.
“I did this to answer the Iranian government,” Hera said. “I made some new work. In one of these photos the deceased spiritual leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, is in leather trousers, half naked.”

She says the point of this is to expose the hypocrisy in Islam about homosexuality and to get everyone talking about the freedom of expression and speech in the Western world.

“I’m hoping my work will arouse discussion,” she said. “The thing that endangers the Netherlands is succumbing to fear and keeping silent about threats and not being alert in regard to freedom of expression,” she says.

“The Netherlands is very much a flashpoint right now. It looks as if there is going to have to be some hard choices made about whether we’re going to defend our civilization or not,” Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch told FOXNews.com.
Spencer says this sort of pressure by Muslim groups “who don’t hesitate to traffic in violent intimidation” will continue to undercut freedom of speech until it no longer exists.

“The ultimate goal of people making threats is to make it illegal or too dangerous or both for anybody to say anything considered to be insulting to Muhammad or Allah, to impose the Islamic code, which is the goal of Usama bin Laden, upon the West,” he said.

“It’s time to take a stand and say we believe in freedom of speech and that means some people will be offended.”
Hera says she is well aware of how others view her work.

“What I’m doing is totally crazy — I’m risking my life,” she said. “They call these photos fatwa photos. I’ve got a fatwa on my plate but I’m doing it for freedom of expression, freedom of speech and I’m hoping that the government is going to take the responsibility and not leave all the responsibility to the artist. That was the reason Theo van Gogh got killed.”

Iranian Artist Fights to Have Muhammad Art Displayed in Dutch Museums

I Sverige har man fotografen Ohlsson Wallin, der synes det er i orden at afbillede Jesus som bøsse (det synes jeg også) , men at Jyllands Posten er noget snavs. Hendes billeder er er ordinær sofastykke-kitch og billig homo agitprop i forhold til Sooreh Heras. Mon ikke Wallin også vil fordømme Hera ? Eller er Hera i et krydsfelt hvor Wallin ville foretrække at holde mund for ikke at fremstå som for stor en idiot ?

Kasem Said Ahmads tilståelse i retten: »Muslimer efterlever, hvad profeten plejer at gøre«

Desværre var det ikke i denne omgang Kasem der var på anklagebænken. Retten sov, som Danmark sover, Justes forsvarer undlod at tage bolden op, hvilket er højst beklageligt, fordi vi så i et retslokale kunne have fået uddybet hvad det er for en skidt karl som muslimerne kalder deres ‘profet’. Enhver med et overfladisk kendskab til islam ved, at hvad Kasem siger er fuldstændig korrekt: Muhammed er ‘uswa hasana, al-insan al-kamil’, dvs. fuldkomment menneske og rollemodel for alle tider. Lad os lige genopfriske nogle af de efterlevelsesværdige aktiviteter som Muhammed var indblandet i:

‘Ægteskab’ med seks-årige Aisha, og sex med hende som ni-årig: Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 87, Number 140, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64; see also Numbers 65 and 88, Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3309; see also 3310.

‘Ægteskab’ med enken efter den netop myrdede høvding i Khaybar-oasen: “Muhammad married a Jewess named Safiyyah after the former killed her family at the battle of Khaybar”.

Muhammed beordrede halshugning af 600-900 bagbundne fanger i Banu Qurayza.

Muhammed beordrede stening af en mand og kvinde anklaget for ‘hor’: “The Prophet then gave the order that both of them should be stoned to death. ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar said, “I saw the man leaning over the woman to shelter her from the stones.””

Muhammed legitimerede krigsbytte: “”Allah made booty lawful and good. He used it to incite the Muslims to unity of purpose. So enjoy what you have captured.””

Liderlig nyttemoral: “”We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed,
(Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess). Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women.” […]”

En dag, et eller andet sted i verden, går der forhåbentlig hul på bylden, og islams og Muhammeds snavsede vasketøj bliver trukket frem i en retssal. At en Hizb ut-Tahrir-supporter som Kasem kan stå uimodsagt og bekende sig til alverdens svineri, uden at blive mødt med uddybende spørgsmål, afspejler den bovlamme mangel på kritisk undersøgelse af islam som også gennemsyrer medierne. Men en dag går der forhåbentlig hul på bylden et sted i verden, og der bliver byttet om på ‘anklager’ og ‘anklaget’ (LFPC).

Kasem Said Ahmad, medlem af Det Islamiske Trossamfunds bestyrelse og tidligere talsmand: »Muslimer efterlever, hvad profeten plejer at gøre. Jeg opfatter bomben i hans turban som en beskyldning for vold, den sætter lighedstegn mellem Islam og terror.«
Ismail Ben Jerbah, formand for Det Islamiske Trossamfund på Fyn: »Jeg føler, jeg bliver betragtet som potentiel terrorist, når man sætter Muhammed i forbindelse med terror.«

Mohammed Slaimann, formand for Islamisk Oplysningscenter: »Hvis man beskylder profeten for noget, er det det samme som at bebrejde mig.«

Sagen fortsætter i morgen med afhøring af islamforsker Jørgen Bæk Simonsen fra Syddansk Universitet.

Chefredaktør afhørt for første gang

Ryd forsiden: Dansk presse stiller kritiske spørgsmål

Ret skal være ret, der er faktisk et aktuelt modeksempel på den mangel på kritisk tilgang til angiveligt moderate muslimer som jeg ofte har beklaget mig over. At dømme efter denne første medieoptræden af Islamisk Trossamfunds nye indpakkede talskvinde Bettina Meisner, kunne valget af en etnisk dansker være et nyttigt lærestykke i den kommende tid: Så dette er hvad der sker med os danskere i islam, kunne reaktionen meget vel blive.

Det kunne også være velgørende pædagogik, at hendes svar ikke skal tolkes gennem et filter af kulturfremmed tæppehandlerretorik og dårligt kendskab til dansk tankegang – Meisner vil fremstå som ‘ren’ islam, hverken mere eller mindre. Jeg er ikke sikker på at det vil være til Islamisk Trossamfunds fordel at blive bedømt uden hattedamet medlidenhed med de ædle vilde (LFPC).

Et spontant indkaldt pressemøde betød en hård debut til de to nye talspersoner i Islamisk Trossamfund, Bettina Meisner og Imran Shah.

Blitzlysene lyner om kap.

Det er tydeligt, at Bettina Meisner ikke er vant til al den opmærksomhed, hun får fra de fremmødte pressefotografer. Den kvindelige halvdel, af den nye talsmandsduo i Islamisk Trossamfund, misser med øjnene, hver gang hun bliver fotograferet. Hun ser lettere irriteret ud.

Så snart de fremmødte journalister stiller spørgsmål, bliver stemningen yderligere presset. Hvad mener Bettina Meisner om stening? Hvad synes hun om Hizb ut-Tahrir? Har Islamisk Trossamfund nogen bagtanker med at udnævne en kvinde som talsperson?

Journalisterne havde medbragt mange »uønskede« spørgsmål.Egentlig havde muslimerne på Dortheavej i København regnet med, at man kunne imødekomme pressens interesse for trossamfundets ny talspersoner gennem telefoninterview.

Men journalisternes opkald var for mange og for overvældende. Derfor valgte man at hasteindkalde til pressemøde mandag eftermiddag. Det er nemlig ikke hver dag, at en kvindelig, dansk islamkonvertit med slør bliver udnævnt som talskvinde i en muslimsk menighed. Bettina Meisner efterlod mange åbne spørgsmål efter sin debut hos pressekoret. Selv ufarlige spørgsmål blev besvaret uklart.Hård ilddåb for ny islamisk talskvinde

Flere kritiske spørgsmål til Bettina Meisner – til fri afbenyttelse af journalister

Er sharia målet for Islamisk Trossamfund, eller er alle religioner for al tid ligestillet med islam, også de polyteistiske? Alle fire sunni-lovskoler fastholder dogmet om islams dominans over verden. Betyder dette ikke, at du må være enten ekstremist eller kætter? Går du imod lovskolerne? Er Muhammed uswa hasana, al-insan al-kamil, rollemodel og fuldkomment menneske, eller vil du tage afstand fra sex med ni-årige Aisha, traktatbrud, halshugninger, steninger, og voldtægt af slavekvinder, beordret af Muhammed? Er ikke-muslimers liv lige så meget værd som muslimers? Må en muslim forlade islam? Må en muslimsk kvinde gifte sig med en ikke-muslim? Er jøder “aber og svin”, som hævdet i Koranen? Vil du tage klar og utvetydig afstand fra den globale jihad, også kaldet terrorisme? Skal muslimer samarbejde med ikke-muslimske myndigheder mod terrorister? Skal deres loyalitet være over for deres land, eller over for ummaen? Vil Islamisk Trossamfund acceptere kritik og satire af Muhammed, hvis loven tillader det? Accepterer Islamisk Trossamfund Israels eksistens som en jødisk stat? Vil man tage klar og utvetydig afstand fra tanker om generobring af f. eks. Spanien?

Svarene kunne ikke undgå at blive særdeles interessante, men indtil videre er jeg skeptisk over for om medierne tør eller evner at gå så direkte til hende (LFPC).

Fjordman: EU-imperiet bygger på krigsførelse … mod dets egne borgere

The European Union is an empire.

No, really. José Manuel Barroso, the leader of the European Commission, the unelected and unaccountable government for half a billion people, which is just now negotiating the surrender of an entire continent to the Islamic world, has stated in public that the EU is an empire.[…]It would make sense to remember that all empires in human history have been created through war. The Romans didn’t create the largest empire in the world by being fluffy little bunnies, and neither did Genghis Khan.

If the EU is an empire, that means a war is being waged against somebody. And it is: A cultural and demographic war waged by mass immigration against the indigenous people of an entire continent – Europe. Whereas empires are normally created by waging a war against other peoples, the EU is the first empire in history created by allowing other peoples to wage a war against your own. […]

EU ministers see themselves as political architects of a superpower in the making. By participating in the EU, they can also free themselves from scrutiny of their actions by elected national parliaments. According to Coughlan, “the great bulk of European laws are never debated at council of minister level, but are formally rubber-stamped if agreement has been reached further down amongst the civil servants on the 300 council sub-committees or the 3,000 or so committees that are attached to the commission.” EU integration represents “a gradual coup by government executives against legislatures, and by politicians against the citizens who elect them.” This process is now sucking the reality of power from “traditional government institutions, while leaving these still formally intact. They still keep their old names – parliament, government, supreme court – so that their citizens do not get too alarmed, but their classical functions have been transformed.”

My interpretation: The European Union – or the Eurabian Empire if you will – is a naked power grab by the elites in order to dismantle the nations there are supposed to serve. Instead of being mere servants of the people in smaller countries, they aspire to become members of an unaccountable elite ruling a vast empire as they see fit. This is why they continue to promote mass immigration as if nothing has happened even if people get blown up, raped, mugged and murdered in their own cities. They simply don’t care. They are cynical generals on a warpath. Ordinary citizens are simply cannon fodder, pawns to be sacrificed in the conquest of their glorious, new empire. Mass immigration is used to crush all nation states simultaneously so that the natives have no real alternatives to flee to, and no countries can come to the aid of others against the advancing Islamization. [mine fremhævelser, LFPC] The Birth of the Eurabian Empire

Annoncer fra Danske Partner-Ads:


Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

  • JensH

    Utroligt!!! Et møde blandt ‘højtrangerende’ islamiske ekstremister finder sted i København, og der skrives/siges ikke et ord om det i de Danske MSM??!! Omvendt hvis de havde balgt at omtale denne skændsel af et møde, så ville reportagerne jo nok have været gennemsyret af sympati for disse islamister.

    Men jeg må igen give LFPC ret når han siger: “Blogsfæren, hvis de vil vide mere”!!!

  • steen

    ja ikke ? Har netoip støvsuget Infomedia igennem – der kunne jo have puttet sig et lille pip – men nej. Venlig henstilling fra PET?

  • Janne

    Er det ikke “bare” en almindelig tendens. For flere måneder siden var der mange rabiate rettroende der deltog i diverse debatfora på aviser og lignende. I dag er der stort set ingen. Det virker koordineret det med at gøre opmærksom på sig selv og sin sag eller det modsatte. Der er vel stilhed før næste storm. Muhammedkrise 3.

  • JensH

    LFPC skriver:

    “Hvornår er for meget for meget? Hvornår overtrumfer national og personlig overlevelse ‘anstændigheden’ og ‘forsamlingsfriheden’?”

    Det bliver ihvertfald ikke sålænge at landets universister, højskoler og museer er befolket med tåber som museumsleder Peter Dragsbo:

    http://jp.dk/meninger/breve/article1334854.ece

    Bare tag denne lille ‘perle’ fra Bangsbo:

    “DEN DAG, Asmaa Abdol Hamid står på Folketingets talerstol med tørklæde og anden selvvalgt påklædning, bliver en sejr for dansk demokrati og integration.”

  • 2008

    TV-nyhederne dækkede arrangementet.