9
dec
Seneste opdatering: 9/12-08 kl. 2117
8 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

Det er ikke ubetinget noget at prale af. Skoleeksemplet er bistandsarbejderne, der  fodrede folkemorderne i Rwanda om dagen, så de kunne myrde mætte og udhvilede om natten. I Orientering Pirateri kan ikke fjernes – højst begrænses igår, kunne man høre, at de  både som somaliske  pirater nu bruger så effektivt, er  resultatet af U landsbistand efter tsunamien i december 2004. For at genrejse en fiskeindustri, der bare aldrig havde eksisteret. Sverige  giver  ufattelige  28 mia. kroner i Ulandshjælp. Også til store militærmagter  som Rusland, Kina og Tyrkiet. 20.000 mennesker arbejder i den selvkørende, svenske bistandsindustri.

Två av varandra oberoende organisationer har på nytt värderat Sverige till den absoluta toppen bland länder som ger bistånd i världen.

– Det är glädjande att Sverige uppfattas som en ledande givare i världen. Speciellt då vårt fokus på resultat uppmärksammas, säger Gunilla Carlsson.

Igår presenterade den amerikanska organisationen Center for Global Development (CDG) sin årliga mätning av hur 22 av världens rikaste länder genom sin politik främjar global utveckling. Bland annat vägs bistånds-, handels-, miljö- och migrationsfrågor in i utvärderingen. Sverige rankas som bästa nation vad avser både kvalitet och kvantitet inom utvecklingsarbetet. Sverige får också ett erkännande för sitt stora flyktingmottagande och insatser för forskning och utveckling. Utrikesdepartementet  søg også Kurt Lundgren, der har berørt emnet mange gange, eks  Jan Mosander   Pengarna som försvann. Missbruk av det svenska biståndet

Asger Aamund

“Indvandringens mål og retning bestemmes således ikke af efterspørgslen efter arbejdskraft, men af udbuddet af sociale ydelser. Hvis det fortsætter, er der kun to muligheder. Enten skal den støttede indvandring standses, eller også bryder det europæiske omsorgssystem totalt sammen.” Berlingske

Abrar Akbar: Vi muslimer har stagnerat i vår intellektuella utveckling

En af Aftonbladets få prisværdige  artikler. Prøv at udskifte “islam” med “Aftonbladet” :

En majoritet muslimer har fastnat i diskussioner kring ritualer och obetydliga ytliga aspekter, när vi borde diskutera varför det inte finns något muslimskt land där man kan förvänta sig rättvisa. Vi borde föra en seriös debatt om varför det spills så mycket blod i islams namn, skriver Abrar Akbar. Våga tala om islams problem

 Stormuftiens  krisekur

 It is far from the first time that the grand mufti has made such calls. What was new, however — and it clearly explains the sudden global interest — is his accompanying comments on the world’s present economic woes, the charge being that they have been brought about by human greed. Specifically it is the use of interest as the foundation of international finance that is to blame. From there has come the proposition that Muslim countries should reject interest, adopt Shariah-compliant economics and unite to form what could become, as he put it, a “formidable economic power”.  Economic woes: Islam’s answer

Eid optøjer i København i nat

Vi har Ritzaus version, men vi venter  gerne et par dage, for at få at vide  hvad der virkelig skete.

Dishonest lawyers lead the invasion of Britain

IT IS no secret that some dishonest lawyers have been exploiting the asylum system for years. They have forged documents, invented life stories and coached bogus asylum-seekers.Nearly 300 firms are authorised to receive legal aid for asylum and immigration work, at a cost of £76m a year. Most are honest and reputable, but a minority are not. Yorkshirepost

Jeg har mødt nogle af de danske i deres storhedstid. Kreative folk. Iflg. Merith Wager er der i Sverige  nu advokater, der  administrerer op til 1000 “flygtninge” ad gangen.

Immigration and the vulnerability of democracy

Speech at the Annual Congress of the Latvian party For Fatherland and Freedom in Riga, December 5, 2008,  Mogens N. J. Camre, Member of the European Parliament

Let me first try to define some important preconditions for democracy.

1. Democracy can only work when the large majority of the people in a given country agree that democracy is the right way to govern the society, and are, therefore, willing to accept the decisions made in the democratic process.

2. The second condition is that no external power or force exercises an influence that is contrary to the democratic decisions – in this part of Europe I need not give examples.

3. The third condition is that people have a certain level of education and understanding so that it can judge about the viability of the decisions. Here we are not speaking about high school education or other more advanced knowledge but about the basic understanding for the effects of the decisions which are made in the democratic process.

However, these more technical conditions are closely linked to the culture of the country that we consider. What is culture? Culture is habits, behaviour, religion, creed, history, language, institutions. All these factors determine the way of life. Unanimity in cultural values is what keeps a people united. Stable countries are countries with a homogenous population while countries with a mixture of different cultures tend to be unstable. I need not mention India, Iraq or Somalia.

How does immigration interfere with democracy? It depends totally upon the characteristics and the numbers of the immigrants. A normal, limited immigration from a culture similar or equal to the existing culture can have a positive effect, provided that the qualifications of the immigrants meet the demands of the country. Immigration from a different culture will normally only be seen as a positive factor if the immigrants are very few or if their qualifications can be seen as a valuable contribution to the existing culture.

My own country, Denmark, has for centuries numerous good examples of very positive effects from the immigration of a limited number of outstanding scientists and artists, first of all from Germany, France, England and Italy.

However, through the last decenniums of the 20th Century, the immigration to Europe – and to the USA – has fundamentally changed. Now it is first of all poor, uneducated people from non-Western countries who immigrate to the rich world in large numbers.  They bring, naturally, a non-Western culture and only some of them are prepared to adapt to the culture of the countries where they settle.

Until the 1980’es immigration to Europe was very limited. Those who came to our countries from other cultures, came because of special relations or because they were hired to special functions, such as artists or scientists.

From the year 1500 until 1980 the total immigration to Denmark was 15.000 people, mostly Germans, French and Jewish people. Then, naturally, there were some Norwegians and Swedes that are not different from Danes. From 1980 until today we have received 400.000 from non-Western countries and they are a heavy burden for the country.

The majority of the first generation who immigrate to Europe today has no relation to the immigration country, except that they have a very detailed knowledge of the economic situation and the social welfare legislation of the country. That is why France, Belgium, the Netherlands, England, Germany, Sweden, Norway and Denmark have a lot, while the Baltic countries have very few immigrants of what we call “other ethnic origin”.

Your foreign population element is due to a different kind of occupation.

In West Europe the second wave of immigrants of course come partly as family unification with the first wave and partly because the knowledge is being spread about the benefits of life in the West (two overhead tables).

Let me underline that there are great differences in the behaviour of non Western immigrants. Some try to obtain a peaceful life and to adapt to Western culture; some do not accept our values and create a lot of problems that we have never seen before.

The general picture is marked by high criminality. If we consider men in the first generation of immigrants the overrepresentation compared to Danish men is 32 per cent. If you consider second and third generation of men between 20 and 29 years of age the overrepresentation is 92 per cent. 23 per cent of all of them were sentenced at a Danish court. If we look at murders committed in Denmark over the period 2001-2006 17 per cent of the perpetrators were foreign citizens, almost all of them of other ethnic origin than Danish. 17 per cent is a very high number taking into consideration, that the number of men of other ethnic origin in Denmark is only 3 per cent.

Persons involved in terror threats are naturally only a fraction of these figures. I need not say that they are all Islamic fundamentalists. They cause a very heavy burden on all European countries. It has been pointed out that the cost of the anti-terror efforts is several million times higher than the cost carried by the terrorists for preparing and performing terror attacks. Just mind the trouble you have every time you travel by air.

According to the Danish experts the high criminality of immigrants of Islamic origin is due to a cultural clash. The fact that the immigrants feel that they are unwanted and that they cannot obtain the good life they expect, create a high number of young, angry men. They cannot meet the demands of the labour market and many of them are not available at the labour market at all. They become losers in the highly skilled Danish society and that leads them into crime.

The Central Bank of Denmark in its report for 3. Quarter 2008 describe the economic burden of immigrants. The bank points out that the immigration leads to a deterioration of the public finances because the non-western immigrants do not contribute positively to the Danish economy and at the same time draw heavily on all resources – social welfare, hospitals, education, prisons etc. etc. I quote the report:

“If immigration should seriously support the financing of the public sector it has to be super-immigration. The concept relates to a person who immigrate after he or she has been educated, who comes directly to the labour market with an employment frequency of 100 and pays the same taxes as a Dane; who does not bring his family and who leaves the country before going on pension” unquote.

 It is obvious that the lack of modern development in large parts of the non-Western world and first of all in the Islamic countries and in Africa is the number one risk to world peace. First of all the poverty, the lack of freedom and stability, the fundamental corruption of the societies and the negative expectations for the future create frustrated, angry people. However, irrespective of how much we would like to change these conditions we are – first of all in the Islamic countries – facing a widespread hatred to the Western world. The Islamic self perception is so far from reality that we have little chance of influencing them.

Let me mention the UN Durban II Conference. The Organisation of Islamic Countries, OIC with the two bandit states Iran and Libya in the chair want to forbid criticism of religions. They want to set a sign of equation between criticism of religion and racism. Their way of thinking is more than 500 years behind the thinking of the developed world. If you want to rule the world according to the rules of the Koran, you will get a world like the one you had in the days when the Koran was written.

It is sheer madness for any democratic country to take part in that conference. There is no reason to have a dialogue with fundamentalists. They cannot be influenced – they will only abuse the participation of democratic countries to legalize their sick ideas – and continue the inhuman suppression of their people and their threats against us.

Now, what has that to do with immigration? The answer is: Everything! Because of the lack of reforms and the constant underdevelopment, the population of the Islamic countries will continuously increase and lead to a deterioration of the living conditions. Therefore, there is a growing pressure on the borders of Europe. More and more people will try to enter Europe. Unfortunately only a minority come because they prefer our culture to the Islamic culture. The fact is that the large majority bring their culture with them. They do everything they can to impose it upon us and if we do not stop them, our Europe will collapse.

The so called Mohammed cartoons in a Danish newspaper are proof of the expansion of Islamic influence. Thirty years ago Muslims would claim Islamic law in Islamic countries only. Now they consider the free world part of their territory and demand that we should follow their rules. You have to notice that many politicians in Europe obey the madness. In England several cities have dropped celebrations of Christmas. Even in Denmark – a country that was christened 1.000 years ago, department stores like Bilka and Brugsen have decided to avoid the usual Christmas decorations and the word “Christmas” not to offend the Muslims. This is a clear violation of free speech and an attempt to give room for Islamism in the free world.

It is not nice to have unwanted foreign guest who even though they are a clear minority are feared so much that Danish companies obey such sick rules. If anyone is offended they are free to leave. We are even ready to pay the ticket.

The EU Commission tells us not to use words like “Islamic terrorists”. We should say “Terrorists who abuse the Islamic faith”. The frightened little European politicians are ready to sell our soul to please those who live in the past. As Winston Churchill expressed it: “A pacifist is a man who feeds a snake hoping that he will be the last to be eaten”.

The demographic development of the Muslim world is frightening. The fear is that within the next 30 to 40 years the Muslim population will double. Over the same period we will hopefully be able not to need to burn oil for energy. That means that the only larger source of income in the Islamic countries will extinguish. That will lead to even more turmoil, uprising and terrorism. Trying to send part of these people to Europe is a declaration of war. Already today we can observe the pressure from Islamic countries against their neighbours. As Samuel Huntington expressed it in his famous book “The Clash of Civilisations”: “There is blood on the borders of Islam”. Mumbay is just the latest case.

The EU Commission that wants to rule all of Europe tell us that Europe cannot survive the democratic changes and that we simply must import 50 millions of Muslims or more. That will be the end of Europe as we know it. The Commission and its observatories against racism and xenophobia is the modern version of the USSR. The more so as we have seen falsified report from the Stasi-people in Vienna. The analyses are wrong. Europe is already overcrowded. It will be an advantage if the population of Europe declines. Let as look at the tables.
There are some countries with low fertility rates, first of all the new member states in Eastern Europe. It is understandable taken the difficult economic situation into consideration. It can clearly be seen that the wealthier European countries have higher birth rates and it must be expected that Eastern Europe will have higher rates along with economic growth. If you look at the population pyramids now and in 2050 there is not a situation that should lead us to accept more immigration – nor under any circumstances the adoption of Turkey in the EU.

The critical mass has already been reached in Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, France, Spain, Austria, Slovenia, Italy, Sweden, and Denmark. Some countries have social welfare systems that are much less favourable than systems in the richest West European countries. Therefore, they do not yet suffer economically from immigration as much as we do – as shown in my quotation from the Central Bank of Denmark.

But in most countries we can clearly see that our fear of the Muslim minority has caused that only very few European countries are ready to send troops to fight terrorists abroad. The suppression of our cultural values – which weak politicians support – the high criminality and the economic burden on the Europeans will raise doubts about the ability of democracy to support the interests of the Europeans.

Decisions that prevent us from expelling criminals and terrorists are being forced upon us – if there is no legal basis, i.e. no decision in the European Council, then the European Court in Luxembourg just legislates against all of us.

We have to realize that there are people in this world that fear development – because development, freedom, and democracy will deprive them of the power which they possess.

In Denmark more and more people ask why the EU will sacrifice the human rights of the Europeans for the inhuman rights of strangers.

I cannot find any reason. It is not our fault that there are nations that cannot or will not adapt to the modern world. Unfortunately, we do not really dare to help them adapt – because we are afraid that they might be offended. So we accept dangerous and irrational beliefs and manners within the borders of Europe, be it the suppression of women or the resistance against education.
I can see one reason however. The EU is not very popular in West Europe. A few weeks ago in the European Parliament Budget Control Committee we had a visit by the former Prime Minister of Bavaria, Mr. Edmond Stoiber. He told us that a recent poll in Germany showed that 82 per cent of Germans wanted the European Parliament to be closed down. A similar number wanted the Commission to be closed.

The Europeans react against the superiority of the EU institutions. People want to protect their nation states and their cultures. And what is the answer of those who want to govern all of Europe? They do everything they can to prevent the peoples from having any influence on the future of EU. First the French referendum said no, then the Dutch, and then the Irish. The European rulers want a new obedient people. How do you get that?

By the well known old method: divide et impera. Divide and rule.

Nobody is really at home outside her or his fatherland. If the EU can spread a growing part of us in other countries and import great numbers of people with a different culture, a big share of the European people will be in general uncertainty about the political life at the place where they live.  European democracy as such will collapse and the bureaucracy in Brussels can rule. I am sure that the model is wrong and, therefore, I am against giving the EU more power. We should not accept treaties which have not been subject to referendums in all member states. The Lisbon Treaty is an insult to the European peoples.

Democracy only lives in the national states. To have member states we must have national populations. Therefore I believe that mass immigration is a threat to democracy.  Altinget.dk

Annoncer fra Danske Partner-Ads:


Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

  • JensH
  • Magga

    Lalle-liberal?

    Sjovt nok hedder partiet stadig Liberal Alliance, det må vel snart være tid at ændre navnet igen. En dag bliver det nok til Radikal Alliance og siden Socialistisk Radikal Alliance for at ende som Konservativ islamisk frihedsalliance.

    (Undskyld Steen, dette er en honnet blog, jeg ved det godt)

    Tak for billederne med det fine morgenlys, hvor man kan mærke den kølige friskhed. Jeg holder også af dine disede billder fra Gurre, der har noget mytologisk over sig

    Kong Valdermar Atterdag og frillen Tove – “Lad Gud kun beholde sit Himmerige, når jeg blot må beholde mit Gurre”, en sætning som fortidens skolebørn kunne glæder sig over, den gang det stadig var comme il faut at lære historie. Stedet er som indhyllet i en sigende stemning, synes jeg.

  • Victor

    For nu lige at forsvare Khader – noget jeg godt nok ikke har den store erfaring i: Hvis vi ikke kan beholde vores udlændingepolitik – og ikke vil ud af EU – så har manden jo ret i, at vi må overveje at svare igen ved at lukke de sociale kasser. Helt og holdent.

  • Gurre ? Det var i sommer engang. “honnet blog” – lidt op og ned, beror på dagsformen.

  • Robin_Shadowes

    EU kommer bli allas vår död. EU som organisation måste förintas om vi inte skall gå under. Folk måste vakna, avsätta sina femtekolonnar-politiker och gå ur EU. Sedan kan vi driva orcherna tillbaka till Mordor.

  • Janne

    Kloge tanker af Asger Aamund.

    Det er naturligvis dybt usolidarisk med dem der har mindst i vores samfund, at der lukkes så mange indvandrere ind på økonomisk understøttelse. Mange som ikke bidrager til at dem der har mindst i Danmark får hjælp på sigt.

  • JensH

    @Victor

    “så har manden jo ret i, at vi må overveje at svare igen ved at lukke de sociale kasser. Helt og holdent.”

    Denne neo-liberale løsning fungerer desværre kun i teorien. I Italien har man ikke en generøs velfærdsstat, som vi kender det i nord-vest Europa, men alligevel måtte de for nylig sætte hæren ind mod hærgende kriminelle bander af indvandrere, som gjorde de Italienske storbyer usikre.

    Iøvrigt, hvis en udlænding dejser syg om på gaden, kan du så forestille dig at vedkommende ikke skulle have sygehus-behandling?? Kan du forresten forestille dig ramaskriget, når TV2NEWS og DDR viser billeder af en Somalisk mor med ni børn, som ikke kan få noget hjælp fra det offentlige??

    Hele denne ide med at tillade fri indvandring men samtidig lukke kasserne i er totalt urealistisk. Ihvertfald for nærværende. Det kan selvfølgelig være, at når den nuværende recession for alvor begynder at gøre ondt, så vil flere og flere Danskere sætte spørgsmålstegn ved, om de nu egentlig ønsker at finansiere de 40 mia kr. som den ikke-vestlige indvandring vi allerede har taget årligt koster skatteyderne. Men det er en helt anden historie.

  • Magga

    Jeg kan da ikke i min vildeste fantasi forestille mig, at vi kan smække de sociale kasser i for mennesker, der bor og arbejder i landet. Det må være mod alt, hvad vi er underlagt af menneskerettigheder osv.D

    ette er blot en af Khaders sædvanlige uigennemtænkte idér, som straks får en masse presse. Han ønsker flere muslimer til landet, og det fremgår den ene gang efter den anden. De skal også nok komme, for der er så dårlige fremtidsudsigter i de muslimske lande, at de allerede er på spring. Men jeg tror, at hele systemet vil bryde sammen om få år.