Man skal bruge koranen, f.eks sura 2:65, sura 5:60 og sura 7:166, men der er mange flere. Apologeterne siger at diis kun skal forstås symbolsk. Derfor skal man også bruge en tegning fra en arabisk avis der udkommer indenfor EU, hvor der er en tegning af jøder eller vesterlændinge afbildet med svine- eller abelegemer eller hoveder. Eventuelt klip fra artikler hvor sammenkædningen mellem vantro , aber og svin foretages.

Så er det ellers bare om at komme igang. Der er også masser af ting i pressen der kan bruges, og der findes retsreferater der øjeblikkeligt skulle udløse en sigtelse for hatespeech, når vore kulturberigere spyr eder og forbandelser over det land der tog dem til sig.

Det ligner gentagelsestvang, det han gør. Jøder, Jehovas Vidner, homoseksuelle, sigøjnere forsøgte sig også med samarbejdsstrategi i nazitidens Tyskland. Ligesom Chamberlain. Og danskerne før og under besættelsen. Det meste af Europa, vel i virkeligheden. Dengang som nu…

In a nutshell, AT&T which has a grip on the growing Internet telephone services, and Google, which is building its control over the visual services like television, film and video imaging, have been squabbling over a need to cooperate in handling the growing volume of Web traffic. At stake is billions of dollars in private investments needed to upgrade the broadband network so customers get the services their new high-speed computers are built to deliver.

During his campaign, President Barack Obama said he supported net neutrality, and the Federal Communication Commission has just outlined new rules that would require Internet providers such as AT&T, Comcast and the others to deliver Web traffic on demand and at the speeds sought by business and private customers.

The McCain bill would allow Internet service providers to slow down or interrupt Internet content or application of their choosing. It would, in effect, block the FCC from making Net neutrality the law of the land.

A bill like that is pretty scary because it not only gives service providers the freedom to control the speed and cost of Internet service, it would give them power over controlling what web writers report and what we are allowed to read. It is the last bastion of media freedom and this is a concerted effort to control it.

If you think you can trust the providers to maintain the kind of freedoms we have been enjoying on the Internet, you are naïve.

http://perdurabo10.tripod.com/galleryi/id30.html