Det sker, at man er ganske taknemmelig over ikke at have  TV. Et usædvanligt perfidt angreb på en mand, der lige akkurat har overlevet et mordforsøg. Det er Thisteds eneste adkomst til at blive nævnt her, at hun overgår ens fantasi. Ens tanker vandrer uvægerligt videre til den dag, hvor et større terrorangreb lykkes på dansk jord. Hvem vil journalistiske løsgående missiler så stille sig op på TV og bebrejde ? Men hvis man synes journalist Thisted er hamper, så har man ikke læst journalist Madsen fra USA. Det er  PET, Israel, Mossad og de neo-konservative, der vil slå Westergaard ihjel. Men så mener han også at svineinfluenzaen er menneskeskabt bio-terrorisme. Kort sagt, ligegyldigt hvad man siger – her så Thisted og Geele søsteren – er der nogen der tager en alvorligt.

The psychological warfare operations by neo-conservatives, who have Denmark under a virtual occupation government reminiscent of the pro-Nazi government during World War II, to stoke anti-Muslim feelings in Denmark, reached another zenith in the “axe attack” on Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard……….According to the Somali man’s sister, the attack on Westergaard may have been part of an elaborate plot by the Danish Security Intelligence Service (Politiets Efterretningstjenes te or PET), to ratchet up tensions between Muslim and non-Muslim Danes and feed the current propaganda effort to breathe new life into the ”all Muslims are potential terrorists” campaign by neocons and Israeli propaganda operatives around the world….The Aarhus incident represents yet another “false flag” attempt by neocons and Israeli provocateurs to feed into the current frenzy of fear gripping Europe and the United States. Danish neocons stage phony terrorist plot

Manden der ville dræbe Robert Redeker

„Må Gud sende os en løve til at halshugge manden,  opgaven er ikke umulig, hvis løven bor i Frankrig, og hvis han er hengiven til Allah.‟ Den jordanske læge Humam Khalil al-Balawi der sidste uge dræbte 7 CIA agenter i Afghanistan ved en selvmordsaktion, var en tredobbelt agent. Han var clearet som CIA agent og blev derfor ikke kropsregistreret. Det er den samme mand, der på en krypteret hjemmside opfordrede andre terrorister til at myrde Robert Redeker i 2006 efter dennes islamkritiske artikel i le Figaro i september samme år. Al Balawis anvisninger for drabet var yderst detaljeret med billeder af Robert Redeker, hans e.mail adresser og telefonummer. Der manglede „to løver‟ der skulle gøre det af med dette udskud til Redeker skrev han. Robert Redeker må stadig holde sig skjult.

Le kamikaze qui voulait tuer Robert Redeker, (Snaphanens oversættelse), Jordanian suicide bomber who killed CIA agents ‚was triple agent‛. Videos: Mother of Jordanian bomber: He was no extremist, Jordanian doctor called double agent behind CIA attack. The Times fotogalleri fra bombestedet. Hans enke udtaler: „My husband accomplished a very big operation in such a war.If he is a martyr, may God accept his martyrdom.‟ Læs om Redekers skæbne her: Robert Redeker in Copenhagen.

Lena Sundström i P 1

Hendes banaliteter og generaliseringer er velkendte. Der er vel kun at tilføje, at hun naturligvis bor i et af Stockholms mest helsvenske kvarterer. Af 2274 beboere er der 69 af ikke  europæisk baggrund. Arbejdsløsheden er 2.7 %. Det må høre med, når man besynger multikulturen og opkaster sig til dommer  over  andre, som ikke gør det. Hvorfor lever hun ikke selv i det samfund, hun taler for ? 30 % af byens befolkning har udenlandsk baggrund.

Hvad tænker svenskerne om os, hvad er det egentlig der karakteriserer danskere og Danmark – set fra hinsidan? Jeg har inviteret 3 svenskere til at tale om deres broderfolk: os. Lena Sundström, som er journalist og klummeskribent på Aftonbladet og forfatter til debatbogen ’Verden lykkeligste folk, – en bog om Danmark’. Desuden medvirker David Dencik er skuespiller og Leif Adolfsson, instruktør, foredragsholder og dramaturg. Kulturkontoret.

Undtagelsestilstand i Culemborg: Raceoptøjer truer med at sprede sig

Around 65 Moluccan families live in the neighbourhood. Their community originally came from the Moluccan islands in what was once the Dutch East Indies (now Indonesia). They came to the Netherlands in 1950, when Indonesia gained independence. The Christian Moluccans had fought alongside the Dutch against the Muslim Indonesian independence fighters. The Moluccan community has a strong ethnic identity as a group in the Netherlands. „I know what we Moluccans are like. We won’t be driven into a corner. Whatever it costs, we try to defend the area we live in. It is in our genes. We are like our forefathers, who fought alongside the Dutch in Indonesia.‟

Mayor helpless to stop violence. On Sunday night, the violence flared up again. More police were despatched to Terweijde and a seventh arrest was made. Now, with just as many police officers in Terweijde as rioters, and riot police on hand, the district has calmed down. But the mayor of Culemborg said yesterday he feels ‘helpless’. These measures won’t address the deeper issues in Terweijde, which have plagued the city administration for a long time. The behaviour of some of the youths is so ‘intolerable’ there’s no point even talking to them. ‘It’s a cat and mouse game. Once the police withdraw, something new takes place,’ he said. The Netherlands shocked by ethnic unrest, Race riots lead to emergency measures in Culemborg

By George he´s got it

Der findes nuværende bikopper – Rowan Williams – og forhenværende som Carey og  Michael J Nazir-Ali. I Danmark, Norge  og Sverige findes der  bare biskopper. Bag facaden kan der være stærke synspunkter, men vi hører dem ikke.

IN breaking free of the pro-immigration consensus of the British establishment, George Carey is showing notable courage.The former Archbishop of Canterbury has not only spoken out against excessive immigration under Labour but even more controversially has articulated worries that the country’s Christian heritage is under threat.For a senior figure in the Church of England to stand up for Christian values is almost unprecedented in modern times. He’ll be claiming to believe in God next.

Migration threatens the DNA of our nation

George Carey, fhv. ærkebiskop af Canterbury

If we are to stop the extreme Right, we must respond to real fears over the number and nature of those coming to Britain.Too often in recent years the call for a rational debate on mass migration has degenerated into name-calling and charges of racism. Even the campaign for Balanced Migration, which I have supported, representing cross-party politicians, has barely been heeded by party leaders who have run scared of the issue. This is why we have launched a declaration calling on the leading political parties to make manifesto commitments to prevent the UK population reaching 70 million, which is projected in official figures by 2029.

The fact is that a rise in the UK population by ten million in two decades will put our nation’s resources under considerable strain, stretching almost to breaking point the enormous reserves of tolerance and generosity of the British people.

The declaration by no means spells out a halt to immigration. In fact we welcome the contribution of both economic migrants and asylum seekers to our lively cosmopolitan culture. But we urge a return to the levels of the early 1990s, about 40,000, compared with 163,000 in 2008. Failure to take that action could be seriously damaging to the future harmony of our society.
’
Last year nearly a million votes were cast for the British National Party. We cannot ignore the fact that such far-right groups exploit genuine concerns about both overpopulation and the ability of this nation to integrate new communities whose values are sometimes very different, even antithetical, to our own.

In Dagenham, where I was brought up, there is a very real danger that a white working-class electorate, alienated by far-reaching social change and largely ignored by the mainstream parties, could vote for a BNP Member of Parliament. This would be a tragedy in our long history of parliamentary democracy. Yet we play into the hands of the far Right if we do not seriously address the concerns that have led to some otherwise decent people supporting modern-day fascism.

There are two aspects to this debate, but they are related. The sheer numbers of migrants from within Europe and elsewhere put the resources of Britain under enormous pressure, but also threaten the very ethos or DNA of our nation.

Recent debates over what it means to be British have been urgently arranged against the background of constitutional changes and the exigencies of mass migration. The Prime Minister has urged us to heed shared values such as tolerance, fair play, pluralism. However, the reality is that these values cannot be said to be solely British. So we must look also to language, institutions and our shared history in valuing what it means to be British and what we could lose if the make-up of our nation changes too rapidly.

Democratic institutions such as the monarchy, Parliament, the judiciary, the Church of England, our free press and the BBC also support the liberal democratic values of the nation. Some groups of migrants, however, are ambivalent about or even hostile to such institutions. The proposed antiwar Islamist march in Wootton Bassett is a clear example of the difficulties extremists pose to British society.

Furthermore, the idea that Britain can continue to welcome with open arms immigrants who immediately establish their own tribunals to apply Sharia, rather than make use of British civil law, is deeply socially divisive. The last thing any of us want is ghettos. And while we don’t expect groups to assimilate, there must be a willingness on their part to integrate with the rest of British society.

Yet, is there anything distinctly Christian about such a call? Some will say “no”. Our values lie rather with the Enlightenment than with the Church. I believe that history is against them. It is my firm view that our society owes more to our Christian heritage than it realises and to overlook this inheritance of faith will lead to the watering down of the very values of tolerance, openness, inclusion and democracy that we claim are central to all we stand for.

This is not to say that I am calling for Christians as a group to be given priority in any migration points system. The tragedy is that any intervention into such sensitive matters is open to such widespread misinterpretation.

But what I am saying is that those who seek to live in this country recognise that they are coming to a country with a Christian heritage and an established Church. Just as we should expect immigrants to subscribe to democratic principles, abide by our laws, speak English, support freedom of speech and a free press, so they should also respect the Christian nature and history of our nation with its broad, hospitable Establishment.

George Carey is a former Archbishop of Canterbury and a columnist for the News of the World