Ja det er i sandhed en opmuntring i det tiltagende europæiske mørke. Med lidt held kan det måske give andre politikere samt befolkningerne i Europa modstandsviljen tilbage. At give efter for trusler og vold gør kun folk til slaver. Det behøver vi ikke. Det er ikke Israels ageren i sit fjendtlige nabolag men derimod EU´s mellemøstpolitik som er en skamplet på al anstændighed. Hvad angår USA, verserer der i øjeblikket en del ubehagelige rygter om præsidenten. Disse bliver naturligvis ikke kommenteret af MSM, hvilket absolut ikke gør dem mindre interessante at følge.

Det var nu også min pointe, beklager, hvis min ironi var for subtil.

In Muslim society, the Muslim alpha male respects only another Muslim alpha male and only if he can demonstrate that he has everything under control; otherwise he will be despised. The non-Muslim is at the bottom of the hierarchy and is treated with the utmost contempt. Kafirs are dirty subhumans to a Muslim. The kafir is similar to an animal that has no right to graze the land or drink at the water-hole…an animal, whose only right is to be preyed upon for food. This is the meat of Islamic morals…
All in all, we require no message from an Arabian moon god to reveal alpha male behavior to us. Alpha behavior is well known in much of the animal kingdom, as well as in criminal enterprises…such as biker gangs…and in fascist politicians who impose their cult of personality on vulnerable populations.

Much of current Islamic rage takes place at the inchoate, psychological level of alpha male narcissism. Alpha behaviors such as honor-killings and cartoon riots defend the ‘honor’, misogyny and supremacism that Muslim males have a vested interest in maintaining.

Of course, Mohammed’s supremacist model for society is incompatible with a pluralistic democracy based on non-violence, equality and tolerance in the public and personal spheres. The two models contradict one another.

* Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
* Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
* Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
* Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
* Reckless disregard for safety of self or others
* Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
* Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

Psykopater udgør omkring 20% af dem med denne diagnose.

http://mentalhealth.com/

Punkt 2 og 7 må give anledning til kulturelle forskelle: Når bedragerisk adfærd er sanktioneret af ledende islamiske institutioner i form af taqiyya og kitman, med rødder i Koranen og hadith. På samme måde er der intet der antyder at lynchninger af f. eks. kristne koptere eller kristne pakistanere medfører anger bagefter. Vi hører i hvert fald aldrig om det, og vi hører heller ikke om modbevægelser mod denne adfærd på islamisk basis. Det sker, igen og igen, i muslimske lande.

Så vidt jeg kan se må det betyde at det i vores kultur er muligt umiddelbart at score to kriterier i ICD-10 ved adfærd der er sanktioneret i islam.

Alene fordi islam ikke har Den Gyldne Regel, og ICD-10 antager denne – “others” er jo ikke underkastet betingelser om man er troende eller vantro.

Kriterierne for psykopati er disse, med mine kommentarer indsat:

Dr. Robert D. Hare’s “Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R)” is the psycho-diagnostic tool most commonly used to assess psychopaths. On this checklist, psychopaths have the majority of the following traits:

* Selfish, callous and remorseless use of others: [OK at bruge vantro til islams fremme]
o Glibness/superficial charm (smooth-talking, engaging and slick)
o Grandiose sense of self-worth (greatly inflated idea of one’s abilities and self-esteem, arrogance and a sense of superiority) [muslimer mere værd end vantro]
o Pathological lying [taqiyya og kitman]
o Conning/manipulative (uses deceit to cheat others for personal gain) [igen OK hvis i islams tjeneste]
o Lack of remorse or guilt (no feelings or concern for losses, pain and suffering of others) [jfr. hvad jeg skrev før om lynchninger af vantro]
o Emotional poverty (limited range or depth of feelings)
o Callous/lack of empathy (a lack of feelings toward others; cold, contemptuous and inconsiderate)
o Failure to accept responsibility for own actions [need I say more?]

* Chronically unstable, antisocial and socially deviant lifestyle:
o Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom (an excessive need for new, exciting stimulation and risk-taking) [hyperaktive 2. g'ere]
o Parasitic lifestyle (exploitative financial dependence on others) [bevidst udnyttelse af velfærdsstaterne]
o Poor behavioral control (frequent verbal abuse and inappropriate expressions of anger) [need I say more?]
o Promiscuity (numerous brief, superficial sexual affairs)
o Lack of realistic, long-term goals [ambition: Martyr eller kalifatet]
o Impulsivity
o Irresponsibility (repeated failure to fulfill or honor commitments and obligations)
o Juvenile delinquency (criminal behavioral problems between the ages of 13-18) [% af fremstillede i byretten]
o Early behavior problems (before age 13)
o Revocation of conditional release (violating parole or other conditional release)
o Many short-term marital relationships (lack of commitment to a long-term relationship)
o Criminal versatility (diversity of criminal offenses, whether or not the individual has been arrested or convicted)

Memo til statsadvokaten: Jeg siger ikke at alle de kriterier jeg kommenterer er legitimeret i den særligt beskyttede ideologi islam. Men nogle er, og omvendt er ingen adfærd i forhold til de vantro umoralsk, hvis den tjener islams udbredelse. Træk mig endelig i retten på dette udsagn.

Rimeligt meget overlap, n’est-ce pas? Et fascinerende område, som man godt kunne frygte ikke vil blive ordentligt belyst, fordi den akademiske verden er styret af multikulturelle værdier og politisk korrekthed.

Det jeg gerne ville forstå her er: Når adfærd der i vores kultur er en del af diagnoser for personlighedsforstyrrelser, men i andre kulturer anses for acceptabel, kan disse mennesker vel pr. definition ikke siges at være personlighedsforstyrrede, eller hvad? Hvad stiller psykiatrien op i forhold til den kendsgerning at Den Gyldne Regel ikke er universelt anerkendt?