Der har været i tusindvis af shaming-artikler om Sverigedemokraterne, men søger man på MSM media om Moderaternas nye riksdagsmand, somalieren Abdirisak Waberi, er der nul hits. Man må til blogs, til udlandet og til hans egen hjemmeside for at se lidt om den glædelige begivenhed, mediegardinet er gået ned. Et meget “kontroversielt” interview lavede Peter Olofsson for RFSL med ham i 2006, Med Koranen i Klassrummet,. Man kan se nogle af hans udtalelser citeret nedenfor. Så nu skal “rumsrena Fredrik” altså sidde med livet i hænderne hvergang Abdirizak bestiger Riksdagens talerstol, det kan blive rigtig underholdende. Det er et af tidens paradokser, at Sveigedemokrater, som netop er demokrater, er “højreradikale”, hvorimod en Moderat riksdagsmand, hvis ideal er en islamisk stat og fire tildækkede koner, er spiselig for selv Danmarks Radio. (Update: Her kl 13:08 kom det første hit på ham efter valget: Realtid -Pekas ut som islamist. Heri ser man, at det er en “islamofobisk smudskampagne”, at citere ham ordret.) Han kommer først i klippet her. Klippet er fra Evin Rubars dokumentar Slaget om Muslimerne, december 2009.

I egenskap av ordförande för Islamiska förbundet har Waberi utgett sig för att representera alla muslimer i Sverige och även hävdat att det finns enbart en tolkning av islam. I egenskap av rektor och förebild för Römosseskolans elever intervjuades Waberi 2006 av tidskriften Ottar. I intervjun uttalar Waberi sitt stöd för konservativa muslimska uppfattningar om män och kvinnors olika skyldigheter och rättigheter, framförallt med avseende på sexualitet. Waberi anser bland annat att män har större sexdrift än kvinnor och att kvinnor som inte följer de muslimska klädreglerna skapar “oro” i samhället.Waberi är av åsikten att en man kan få ha fyra fruar och att han kan få slå sin fru om hon är otrogen.Waberi har även kritiserats för att han undertecknat ett upprop för det socialdemokratiska kvinnoförbundets ordförande Nalin Pekguls avgång i samband med att hon uttalat sig i en fråga rörande “religiösa extremisters hot mot kvinnors frihet.” – “Mannen enligt islam får gifta sig med en kvinna som tillhör en annan religion, men en muslimsk kvinna måste alltid ingå äktenskap med en muslimsk man.””Mannen klarar av att ge kärlek till fyra kvinnor, men jag tror inte att kvinnan har den kärlek som krävs för att vara med fyra män.” Abdirisak Waberi (m) valdes in i riksdagen, Somali born Muslim leader becomes MP in Sweden,

Reinfeldt og De Grønne Khmerer

Det hedder Miljömupperna i folkemunde. Danske kommentatorer fremstiller dem som et slags midterparti, men det er løgn. De er langt til venstre for SF, men blot med en demokratisk troværdighed der overstiger Vänsterpartiets, hvad der ikke er nogen særlig bedrift. Partiprogramet er her. Svenske “borgerlige” bør fremstå i det rette lys i Danmark, ikke i Ole Birk Olesens og andre letvægteres. I Danmark har vi liberalister som Christopher Arzrouni og Søren Pind, der vil kunne se det paradoksale i dette politiske ægteskab og dets givetvise succesrige forsøg på at udradere en folkelig opinion. Der købes tid, men det er en meget kostbar tid. og i værste fald delegitimiserer det demokratiet mere, end det allerede er. Modtstanderne af indvandringskritik i Sverige tigger om en drastisk opposition. Kendere af Sverige ved, hvordan den kan se ud. De har fået en demokratisk modstand på kun 5.7 %, men den lader de sig ikke nøje med.Miljöpartiet vill utöka samarbetet med alliansen. Med målet att blockera Sverigedemokraterna i riksdagen.

Kjære elskede Sverige – så ble det aldeles tyst..

Etter Sverigedemokratenes inntog i Riksdagen, sitter karakteristikken “ekstremisme” løst i den meningsdannende eliten og blant mediekommentatorer. Og ja; at det er mye som er ekstremt ved Sverige, er desverre en brutal sannhet. Den kulturelle selvfornektelsen er ekstrem, voldteksratene er ekstreme, jødeforfølgelsen er ekstrem. Svenskene hadde fortjent langt bedre.

I dyptfølt fortvilelse den siste uken over de svenske tilstandene grunnet masseinnvandring og kulturell selvfornektelse, prøvde jeg å skrive av meg denne fortvilelsen heller enn å søke mental bistand annet sted. Det ble til et åpent brev til vårt nabofolk, sendt til Dagens Nyheter. Jeg fikk umiddelbart en hyggelig takkehilsen fra debattredaktøren som skulle lese kommentaren min. Så ble det aldeles tyst..Hege Storhaug: Sveriges uskyld er tapt

Steyn: Mollifying Muslims, and Muslifying Mollies

[…] Too many people in the free world have internalized Islam’s view of them. A couple of years ago, I visited Guantanamo and subsequently wrote that, if I had to summon up Gitmo in a single image, it would be the brand-new copy of the Koran in each cell: To reassure incoming prisoners that the filthy infidels haven’t touched the sacred book with their unclean hands, the Korans are hung from the walls in pristine, sterilized surgical masks. It’s one thing for Muslims to regard infidels as unclean, but it’s hard to see why it’s in the interests of us infidels to string along with it and thereby validate their bigotry. What does that degree of prostration before their prejudices tell them about us? It’s a problem that Muslims think we’re unclean. It’s a far worse problem that we go along with it.

Take this no-name pastor from an obscure church who was threatening to burn the Koran. He didn’t burn any buildings or women and children. He didn’t even burn a book. He hadn’t actually laid a finger on a Koran, and yet the mere suggestion that he might do so prompted the President of the United States to denounce him, and the Secretary of State, and the commander of US forces in Afghanistan, various G7 leaders, and golly, even Angelina Jolie. President Obama has never said a word about honor killings of Muslim women. Secretary Clinton has never said a word about female genital mutilation. General Petraeus has never said a word about the rampant buggery of pre-pubescent boys by Pushtun men in Kandahar. But let an obscure man in Florida so much as raise the possibility that he might disrespect a book – an inanimate object – and the most powerful figures in the western world feel they have to weigh in. […] Mark Steyn: Mollifying Muslims, and Muslifying Mollies

Sharia og den amerikanske forfatning: Hvordan er det nu?

Man kan nok sige at islamoskeptikere som bl. a. Snaphanen altid vil få tildelt et forspring i debatten af modpartens aldeles manglende evne til at sælge sin sag baseret på de nøgne kendsgerninger. Vores problemer med gennemslagskraften har derfor at gøre med fortielser og ad-hominem-angreb. Tag f. eks. Ground Zero-imam Feisal Raufs groteske påstand om foreneligheden af sharia med, ja, den amerikanske forfatning og de frihedsrettigheder den udstikker:

“What’s right with America and what’s right with Islam are, in fact, very much in sync…I call America a Sharia compliant state.” YouTube

Blev Rauf udsat for kritisk journalistisk eksponering og behandling for denne påstand kunne adskillige bloggere godt begynde at finde andre mærkesager. Jurist Kelly O’Connells gennemgang af sharia med udgangspunkt i dette citat ligner en rigtig god introduktion til dette uvæsen (LFPC).

[…] II General Description of Shari’ah Criminal Law

To Western eyes, the Shari’ah presents a disorganized and incomplete description of Criminal Law. According to Joseph Schacht, in Introduction to Islamic Law,

There exists no general concept of penal law in Islam. The concepts of guilt and criminal responsibility are little developed, that of mitigating circumstances does not exist; any theory of attempt, complicity, of concurrence is lacking. On the other hand, the theory of punishments, with its distinction of private vengeance, hadd punishments, ta’zir, and coercive and preventative measures, shows a considerable variety of ideas.

As Forte points out, one cannot actually say there is a modern Muslim penal code, writing, “Islamic law does not possess a concept of penal law comparable to that of modern systems. Instead, it categorizes its offenses by the types of punishment they engender.” […]

IV Muslim Criminal Law Theory

A quintessentially religious law, Shari’ah has set penalties, known as hadd—called “exemplary punishments” (Qur’an 5:38). These are performed in public to remind residents the wages of evil. Retribution is an important part of Muslim punishments, using the standard of Lex Talionis, ie “eye for an eye,” to measure punishment. For example, the murderer should be executed in the same manner his or her victim was dispatched. The Discretionary Punishments (ta’zir) are especially meant to return offenders to the gilded path of Allah. […] Kelly O’Connell: Crime & Punishment in Islamic Law

Som om briterne ikke var trængte nok: EU slår ladeporten op

Benefits tourists are set to get the green light to come to Britain and immediately claim handouts totalling £2.5billion a year.

According to documents leaked to the Mail, ministers have been warned that restrictions on claims by immigrants are against the law and must be scrapped.

The European Commission’s ruling threatens to open the door to tens of thousands who are currently deterred from coming to Britain.

In a letter seen by the Mail, it warns that the restrictions are ‘not compatible’ with EU law. It says: ‘EU law leaves it to member states to determine the details of their social security schemes and social assistance schemes, including the conditions on awarding benefits.

‘However, when making use of this competence, member states have to comply with the fundamental principles of EU law, such as the right to equal treatment on the basis of nationality. Having examined the “right to reside” test… it is not compatible with different legal provisions of EU law.’

The Whitehall source warned: ‘This has the potential to open the doors of the benefits system to anyone coming here from the entire European economic area, who may have no intention of working or even looking for work but simply wants to claim benefits.

‘We already have enough of a problem managing people who want to come here. But this would open up a whole new wave of benefit tourism.’ […]  An open door to benefit tourists: EU warns Britain it can’t stop thousands more migrants claiming welfare handouts

Rumænsk ‘Fagin’-bande oprullet

Vi har ikke sendt teksten her til godkendelse hos Zenia Stampe, så vi må hellere i relativeringens navn fastslå at dette lige så vel kunne have drejet sig om en britisk eller dansk bande (LFPC).

A huge trial began today in Romania featuring 26 members of a brutal child trafficking gang accused of forcing 181 gypsy children to beg on the streets of Britain.

Some of them are charged with sending their own children and those of relatives to earn cash here. Judge Daniela Bejenaru rejected bail requests at Harghita Criminal Court and ordered that 18 men be held until the trial.[…]

Court documents allege that 181 children were sent to the UK by the gang, who travelled all over Romania to snatch children from the poorest families.

Disabled children are said to have been particularly sought after because they made more effective beggars.

The terrified youngsters were allegedly beaten and abused and put to work begging and stealing in British cities and some were even said to have been disfigured to increase their earning potential on the street.[…]In the dock, the gang of modern-day Romanian Fagins accused of mutilating children to beg on British streets