4
jun
Seneste opdatering: 5/6-12 kl. 0510
4 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

Bloggen er på rejse i det Sydfynske Øhav, der postes ikke Grundlovsdag trods mobilt bredbånd og alt det der. Kommentarer der bliver hængede slipppes igennem i morgen.

Endnu en meningsforbryder sigtet

Lars Hedegaard & Katrine Winkel Holm: Mange undrer sig over, at opklaringsprocenten for bl.a. indbrudstyverier styrtdykker. Men der er en forklaring: Politiet har så travlt med at komme efter meningsforbrydere, at det nødvendigvis må gå ud over andre opgaver.[..]

Men nu kommer det underligste: Torben Mark er så vidt vi forstår ikke sigtet for at have sagt slemme ting om danskere, eskimoer, asiater osv., men kun for at have skrevet ilde om medlemmer af religiøse grupper. Man kan altså frit fornærme eskimoer, men ikke muslimer, selv om »etniske grupper« hører til de særligt begunstigede i § 266b. Hvis den sigtede havde skrevet, at der er folk i rullestol, der vender det blinde øje til onklernes adfærd, ville det også være i orden, for handicappede nyder ingen særlig beskyttelse i den danske krænkelsesparagraf. Homoseksuelle gør, men formentlig ikke heteroseksuelle. Det går nok også an at fornærme folk, der bor på Falster, mens man skal vare sig for at sige noget lignende om hinduer. Berlingske


Dalrymple: “In politics as in medicine, first do no harm”

– “Heart of Darkness”; National Review; July 19, 1993

Why do I spend so much time arguing against such obvious rubbish, which should be both self-refuting and auto-satirizing the moment someone utters it? Why not just go and read a good book?
The problem is that nonsense can and does go by default. It wins the argument by sheer persistence, by inexhaustible re-iteration, by staying at the meeting when everyone else has gone home, by monomania, by boring people into submission and indifference. And the reward of monomania? Power.
– “The Triumph of Reason?”; City Journal; July 27, 2005

Boundaries do not maintain themselves and are in need of maintenance and sometimes vigorous defense.
– Our Culture, What’s Left of It; 2005

When every benefit received is a right, there is no place for good manners, let alone for gratitude.
– “What is Poverty?”; City Journal; Spring 1999

In the welfare state, mere survival is not the achievement that it is, say, in the cities of Africa, and therefore it cannot confer the self-respect that is the precondition of self-improvement.
– “What is Poverty?”; City Journal; Spring 1999

There is, in fact, no better way to produce shallow and superficial people than to let them live their lives entirely in the open, without concealment of anything.
– “All Sex, All the Time”; City Journal; Summer 2000

The corrosive ideal of social justice has been etched on to the psyche of the British so that it has become the good that is the sine qua non of all other goods. If society is unjust, anything goes. The assumption of personal responsibility can be postponed until social justice (always defined by its absence, for defining it positively is rather difficult) has been attained. In the meantime, one can behave abominably, yet feel aggrieved.
– “Nasty, British and Short”; The Spectator; September 21, 1991

A curious reversal in the locus of moral concern has taken place: people feel responsible for everything except for what they do.
– “Claiming a Right to Murder”; The Spectator; March 30, 1996

The compression of the generations… is one of the most noticeable — though not necessarily noticed — social trends in modern Britain. Children become prematurely adult, while adults remain permanently infantilised.
– “Generation Sex”; The Spectator; September 4, 1999

Inside every rebel, there’s a dictator trying to get out.
– “Guerrillophilia and the Sincerely Frivolous”; The New Criterion; February 2002

Hypocrisy, said La Rochefoucauld, is the tribute that vice pays to virtue; to which, one might add, that at least it acknowledges the difference.
– “Caught With His…”; National Review; September 24, 2007

The loss of the religious understanding of the human condition — that man is a fallen creature for whom virtue is necessary but never fully attainable — is a loss, not a gain, in true sophistication.
– “What’s Wrong With Twinkling Buttocks?”; City Journal; Summer 2003

It is often much easier to bring about total disaster than modest improvement.
– “What We Have to Lose”; City Journal; Autumn 2001

Where a reputation for intolerance is more feared than a reputation for vice itself, all manner of evil may be expected to flourish.
– “A Horror Story”; City Journal; Spring 1996

Wisdom and good governance require more than the consistent application of abstract principles.
– Romancing Opiates; 2006

A great deal of labor goes into the denial of the obvious: for the obvious is an affront to intellectuals, including me, whom it threatens with redundancy.
– “Dubai, Havana and Choosing Between Evils”; The New Criterion; October 2002

If consequences are removed from enough actions, then the very concept of human agency evaporates, life itself becomes meaningless, and is thenceforth a vacuum in which people oscillate wildly between boredom and oblivion.
– Romancing Opiates; 2006

Better a man with no ideas than the wrong ones.
– “Booker vs. Goncourt; or, When Silence is a Duty”; The New Criterion; January 2004

Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.
– Interview with Jamie Glazov; FrontPageMagazine.com; August 31, 2005

So thoroughly have we drunk at the wells of collectivism that we see the state always as the solution to any problem, never as an obstacle to be overcome. One can gauge how completely collectivism has entered our soul -so that we are now a people of the government, for the government, by the government.
– “The Roads to Serfdom”; Spring 2005

In the multiculturalist’s mental world, in which the savages are forever noble, there is no criterion by which to distinguish high art from low trash.
– “The Barbarians at the Gates of Paris”; City Journal; Autumn 2002

Never has so much indifference masqueraded as so much compassion; never has there been such willful blindness.
– “Seeing Is Not Believing”; City Journal; Autumn 2000

When young people want to praise themselves, they describe themselves as “nonjudgmental.” For them, the highest form of morality is amorality.
– “The Frivolity of Evil”; City Journal; Autumn 2004

The Dionysian has definitively triumphed over the Apollonian. No grace, no reticence, no measure, no dignity, no secrecy, no depth, no limitation of desire is accepted. Happiness and the good life are conceived as prolonged sensual ecstasy and nothing more.
– “All Sex, All the Time”; City Journal; Summer 2000

A golden age of felicity has not arrived: and the promise of a pill for every ill remains, as it always will, unfulfilled. Anyone who had read his Shakespeare would not have been surprised by this disappointment.
– “Why Shakespeare Is For All Time”; City Journal; Winter 2003

One cannot but feel sorrow for people who think that by permanently disfiguring themselves they are somehow declaring their independence or expressing their individuality. The tattoo has a profound meaning: the superficiality of modern man’s existence.
– “Exposing Shallowness”; The New Criterion; June 2000

The cult of celebrity trivializes everything it touches.
– “Pope Rosie: Pray for Us”; L.A. Times; May 20, 2007

Theodore Dalrymple quotes

Annoncer fra Danske Partner-Ads:


Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

  • Pingback: “The forbidden history” – en australier gør op med meningskontroltyranniet « Hodjanernes Blog()

  • Frank P

    Glimrende forsvar for det frie ord!

    Vestager har i dag erklæret at “debatten” er død. Sådan Dronning Magrethe!

    Debatten lever skam i bedste velgående. Dele af den er flyttet til andre fora, dele af den er hvor den hele tiden har været. Det nye er Magrethes og hendes ligesindedes fuldstændige kapitulation. De kan ikke længere diske op med noget som helst der bare har antydningen af at være et reelt og tænksomt modsvar!

    Enten møder man slet og ret tavshed efter at have leveret en gennemarbejdet bog som MUJ, ellers også ender det i den reneste form for flueknepperi, tydeligst eksemplificeret på JP’s og B’s kommentarspor. Her afslører moddebattørerne, at de ikke er interesseret i debatten, formålet er blot at afspore den, drukne det essentielle i larm og støj. De tyr til begrebslige spidsfindigheder og argumentatoriske kneb, stilen er overdrevent høvisk og lettere arrogant, man fornemmer lidt at de sidder små-fnisende ved tastaturet.

  • Off topic.

    Utroligt at politikerne fejrer grundlovsdag. Efter de gang, på gang har brudt grundloven.
    De har givet Danmark væk i små stykker, ved underskrivelse af konventioner. Indmeldelse i FN, Nato og EU.
    Og lukket fremmede magter ind i landet. Når politikerne bryder loven og dommerne ikke dømmer efter loven. Eller gør opmærksom på brud på grundloven. Må loven siges, at være sat ud af kraft.

    Det understreges af, at politiet ikke kommer på Christania og Nørrebro.

  • Nielsen

    Fantastisk god video om ytringsfrihed. Kan ikke vente til opfølgerne udsendes.