Schulz er ikke engang i stand til at rive et par multikulturelle almindeligheder om fred i vor tid, rummelighed og tolerance af sig, men farer så snart ordet jihad penetrere han øregange op, som havde han sat sig på et pindsvin. Hvad sker der?
Var hans islamo-orgie for meget selv for hans bosser i det øverste lag af den euro-oligarkiske kransekage?
Er han blevet bedt om at gå lidt mere stille med sin islamofili, fordi europæerne via hans ekstravagance kunne gå hen og opdage hvor vidt eurokratiet har spredt stængerne for ørkenens sønner??
Det er ikke godt at vide.
Tydeligt er det dog, at den europæiske politiske klasser alene bibeholder vores basale friheder fordi de endnu ikke har fundet nogle plusord, der tilfredstillende kan dække over deres afskaffelse.
Må jeg ydmygt foreslå en håndfuld vendinger, der let kan drysses hen over den nødvendige lovgivning: “Menneskeheds hensyn”, “anti-had”, “dialog-garanti”, “total-respekt”, “obligatorisk stuerenhed”, “nedgørelses-stop”, “frihed til anstændighed”…osv. osv.
14
00:00:52,770 –> 00:00:56,820
So now we are at the European Parliament [Brussels] looking for Mr
15
00:00:56,840 –> 00:01:00,880
Schulz. Of course, we petitioned for an interview, that was not possible,
16
00:01:00,900 –> 00:01:04,920
the doors remained closed. Well Mr Schulz, let’s wait and see.
17
00:01:04,940 –> 00:01:08,950
18
00:01:08,970 –> 00:01:12,990
19
00:01:13,010 –> 00:01:17,090
20
00:01:17,110 –> 00:01:21,130
21
00:01:21,150 –> 00:01:25,170
…Mr Schulz?
22
00:01:25,190 –> 00:01:29,220
23
00:01:29,240 –> 00:01:33,290
24
00:01:33,310 –> 00:01:37,340
Who are you, if I may ask. – Yaya, alright. Ok.
25
00:01:37,360 –> 00:01:41,380
Wait a moment, then you can come inside, then
26
00:01:41,400 –> 00:01:45,430
you can make an interview with me, but… – Martin Schulz, the president of the parliament,
27
00:01:45,450 –> 00:01:49,440
has spoken nonsense. He did not defend freedom of speech
28
00:01:49,460 –> 00:01:53,470
in matters of the Innocence of Muslims film,
29
00:01:53,490 –> 00:01:57,540
but he rather said it needed to be prohibited, rather said
30
00:01:57,560 –> 00:02:01,570
(Sign: Loud criticism against cowardly aappearance) it must not be broadcast, it is a scandal. – The core value
31
00:02:01,590 –> 00:02:05,680
of the European Union is freedom of expression, and yesterday it was trod upon
32
00:02:05,700 –> 00:02:09,700
by Mr Schulz with big feet. And this is not respectable for a president
33
00:02:09,720 –> 00:02:13,830
of the European Parliament. – Sorry? – Do you speak german? – A little. – Ya.
34
00:02:13,850 –> 00:02:17,850
Which organ do you represent, which,
35
00:02:17,870 –> 00:02:21,930
what is your function, which television do you represent? – We are from dutch
36
00:02:21,950 –> 00:02:25,940
televison. – Dutch television? Thank you. – So then let’s
37
00:02:25,960 –> 00:02:30,010
wait, right? – Look, you can surely have an interview,
38
00:02:30,030 –> 00:02:34,110
but this is not the usual procedure, right? You need an appointment,
39
00:02:34,130 –> 00:02:38,160
we’re having an appointment now, this gentleman must wait. –
40
00:02:38,180 –> 00:02:42,210
When something like this happens, when a person of a authority, an official person of authority, the president
41
00:02:42,230 –> 00:02:46,240
of the European Parliament, says, rather appeals to censureship and
42
00:02:46,260 –> 00:02:50,290
self-censureship, then this is exactly what the violent
43
00:02:50,310 –> 00:02:54,310
islmamists want. And it will only instigate them to
44
00:02:54,330 –> 00:02:58,410
use even more violence in the future, in order to attack physically any possible
45
00:02:58,430 –> 00:03:02,430
criticism of islam. – Please have a seat.
46
00:03:02,450 –> 00:03:06,540
What was your name? – Rutger Castricum. – What
47
00:03:06,560 –> 00:03:10,680
was your name?
48
00:03:10,700 –> 00:03:14,720
But it won’t go that way… – Then just sit down. – Ya but ‘sit down’, then I can’t [reach you] with my microphone. – Just have a seat.
49
00:03:14,740 –> 00:03:18,740
But I will never be able [to reach you] if I sit here. – Just sit there, no problem. – It’s a bit crazy to
50
00:03:18,760 –> 00:03:22,800
sit like that. – Well, then just sit down, I think
51
00:03:22,820 –> 00:03:26,950
this is better also for you. – Then I’ll do it this way, this way. – No, sit… –
52
00:03:26,970 –> 00:03:30,990
Can we do it standing up? – So, if you want an interview with me, then please have a seat.
53
00:03:31,010 –> 00:03:35,030
54
00:03:35,050 –> 00:03:39,120
55
00:03:39,140 –> 00:03:43,160
56
00:03:43,180 –> 00:03:47,220
As a [private] person, he may say what he likes, but not as the president of the parliament.
57
00:03:47,240 –> 00:03:51,290
But he did so. – Yes, so that is a bad thing, and I will address him in
58
00:03:51,310 –> 00:03:55,330
the debate which follows, for this just can’t be. – The president may have his [private] opinion, but
59
00:03:55,350 –> 00:03:59,460
when he speaks, he speaks on behalf of the European Parliament.
60
00:03:59,480 –> 00:04:03,520
61
00:04:03,540 –> 00:04:07,560
62
00:04:07,580 –> 00:04:11,600
63
00:04:11,620 –> 00:04:15,690
64
00:04:15,710 –> 00:04:19,730
65
00:04:19,750 –> 00:04:23,760
66
00:04:23,780 –> 00:04:27,900
67
00:04:27,920 –> 00:04:31,940
68
00:04:31,960 –> 00:04:36,070
69
00:04:36,090 –> 00:04:40,110
70
00:04:40,130 –> 00:04:44,180
But he doesn’t give me a reply.
71
00:04:44,200 –> 00:04:48,270
Well, he has given a reply. – But this is not a reply? – If you do not accept it, this
72
00:04:48,290 –> 00:04:52,330
is your problem, not our problem. – Pardon? – It is your problem if you don’t accept the reply.
73
00:04:52,350 –> 00:04:56,400
74
00:04:56,420 –> 00:05:00,470
Would you kindly leave
75
00:05:00,490 –> 00:05:04,540
the office now
76
00:05:04,560 –> 00:05:08,600
and switch off the camera. You loose your accreditation
77
00:05:08,620 –> 00:05:12,650
for the European Parliament. May I ask you to go now.
78
00:05:12,670 –> 00:05:16,700
I have another interview with a… –
79
00:05:16,720 –> 00:05:20,740
He simply needs to stop this kind of nonsense.
80
00:05:20,760 –> 00:05:24,780
Respectively offer his apologies, no? – He needs to tell the parliament:
81
00:05:24,800 –> 00:05:28,860
I did not speak on your behalf – fullstop.
Donationer til driften af Snaphanen.dk
Donationerne kan indbetales via ens egen PayPal-bruger eller direkte med Dankort/VISA til PayPal. Alle indbetalinger holdes hemmelige. Størrelsen af donationerne bestemmer doner selv og gives i danske kroner. Alle donationer modtages med stort tak!
Mail adresse: snappost (snabel a) yahoo (punktum ) dk Regarding use of my copyrighted photos on the blog, please contact the mail above.
Prudentius
Schulz er ikke engang i stand til at rive et par multikulturelle almindeligheder om fred i vor tid, rummelighed og tolerance af sig, men farer så snart ordet jihad penetrere han øregange op, som havde han sat sig på et pindsvin. Hvad sker der?
Var hans islamo-orgie for meget selv for hans bosser i det øverste lag af den euro-oligarkiske kransekage?
Er han blevet bedt om at gå lidt mere stille med sin islamofili, fordi europæerne via hans ekstravagance kunne gå hen og opdage hvor vidt eurokratiet har spredt stængerne for ørkenens sønner??
Det er ikke godt at vide.
Tydeligt er det dog, at den europæiske politiske klasser alene bibeholder vores basale friheder fordi de endnu ikke har fundet nogle plusord, der tilfredstillende kan dække over deres afskaffelse.
Må jeg ydmygt foreslå en håndfuld vendinger, der let kan drysses hen over den nødvendige lovgivning: “Menneskeheds hensyn”, “anti-had”, “dialog-garanti”, “total-respekt”, “obligatorisk stuerenhed”, “nedgørelses-stop”, “frihed til anstændighed”…osv. osv.
Michael Laudahn
Voilà – du behøver åbenbart ikke en gang at bede om det:
1
00:00:00,030 –> 00:00:04,060
(Sign: Schulz kneels before radical moslems) The president of the European Parliament, Martin
2
00:00:04,080 –> 00:00:08,090
Schulz, ended up in controversy after he yesterday dumped
3
00:00:08,110 –> 00:00:12,130
freedom of speech, on behalf of Europe.
4
00:00:12,150 –> 00:00:16,230
Flanked by an arab delegation, whose feet he not yet kissed,
5
00:00:16,250 –> 00:00:20,280
the socialist stroke two-fisted out against the infamous anti-islam film ‘Innocence
6
00:00:20,300 –> 00:00:24,320
of Muslims’. And not many seemed to be thankful for that.
7
00:00:24,340 –> 00:00:28,330
Shocked by all the commotion, Schulz today doesn’t accompany his colleagues travelling home, instead hoped
8
00:00:28,350 –> 00:00:32,390
to trivialise his gaffe through a written nonsense declaration. But he didn’t know
9
00:00:32,410 –> 00:00:36,520
our Rutger [the reporter] yet.
10
00:00:36,540 –> 00:00:40,560
11
00:00:40,580 –> 00:00:44,620
12
00:00:44,640 –> 00:00:48,640
13
00:00:48,660 –> 00:00:52,750
14
00:00:52,770 –> 00:00:56,820
So now we are at the European Parliament [Brussels] looking for Mr
15
00:00:56,840 –> 00:01:00,880
Schulz. Of course, we petitioned for an interview, that was not possible,
16
00:01:00,900 –> 00:01:04,920
the doors remained closed. Well Mr Schulz, let’s wait and see.
17
00:01:04,940 –> 00:01:08,950
18
00:01:08,970 –> 00:01:12,990
19
00:01:13,010 –> 00:01:17,090
20
00:01:17,110 –> 00:01:21,130
21
00:01:21,150 –> 00:01:25,170
…Mr Schulz?
22
00:01:25,190 –> 00:01:29,220
23
00:01:29,240 –> 00:01:33,290
24
00:01:33,310 –> 00:01:37,340
Who are you, if I may ask. – Yaya, alright. Ok.
25
00:01:37,360 –> 00:01:41,380
Wait a moment, then you can come inside, then
26
00:01:41,400 –> 00:01:45,430
you can make an interview with me, but… – Martin Schulz, the president of the parliament,
27
00:01:45,450 –> 00:01:49,440
has spoken nonsense. He did not defend freedom of speech
28
00:01:49,460 –> 00:01:53,470
in matters of the Innocence of Muslims film,
29
00:01:53,490 –> 00:01:57,540
but he rather said it needed to be prohibited, rather said
30
00:01:57,560 –> 00:02:01,570
(Sign: Loud criticism against cowardly aappearance) it must not be broadcast, it is a scandal. – The core value
31
00:02:01,590 –> 00:02:05,680
of the European Union is freedom of expression, and yesterday it was trod upon
32
00:02:05,700 –> 00:02:09,700
by Mr Schulz with big feet. And this is not respectable for a president
33
00:02:09,720 –> 00:02:13,830
of the European Parliament. – Sorry? – Do you speak german? – A little. – Ya.
34
00:02:13,850 –> 00:02:17,850
Which organ do you represent, which,
35
00:02:17,870 –> 00:02:21,930
what is your function, which television do you represent? – We are from dutch
36
00:02:21,950 –> 00:02:25,940
televison. – Dutch television? Thank you. – So then let’s
37
00:02:25,960 –> 00:02:30,010
wait, right? – Look, you can surely have an interview,
38
00:02:30,030 –> 00:02:34,110
but this is not the usual procedure, right? You need an appointment,
39
00:02:34,130 –> 00:02:38,160
we’re having an appointment now, this gentleman must wait. –
40
00:02:38,180 –> 00:02:42,210
When something like this happens, when a person of a authority, an official person of authority, the president
41
00:02:42,230 –> 00:02:46,240
of the European Parliament, says, rather appeals to censureship and
42
00:02:46,260 –> 00:02:50,290
self-censureship, then this is exactly what the violent
43
00:02:50,310 –> 00:02:54,310
islmamists want. And it will only instigate them to
44
00:02:54,330 –> 00:02:58,410
use even more violence in the future, in order to attack physically any possible
45
00:02:58,430 –> 00:03:02,430
criticism of islam. – Please have a seat.
46
00:03:02,450 –> 00:03:06,540
What was your name? – Rutger Castricum. – What
47
00:03:06,560 –> 00:03:10,680
was your name?
48
00:03:10,700 –> 00:03:14,720
But it won’t go that way… – Then just sit down. – Ya but ‘sit down’, then I can’t [reach you] with my microphone. – Just have a seat.
49
00:03:14,740 –> 00:03:18,740
But I will never be able [to reach you] if I sit here. – Just sit there, no problem. – It’s a bit crazy to
50
00:03:18,760 –> 00:03:22,800
sit like that. – Well, then just sit down, I think
51
00:03:22,820 –> 00:03:26,950
this is better also for you. – Then I’ll do it this way, this way. – No, sit… –
52
00:03:26,970 –> 00:03:30,990
Can we do it standing up? – So, if you want an interview with me, then please have a seat.
53
00:03:31,010 –> 00:03:35,030
54
00:03:35,050 –> 00:03:39,120
55
00:03:39,140 –> 00:03:43,160
56
00:03:43,180 –> 00:03:47,220
As a [private] person, he may say what he likes, but not as the president of the parliament.
57
00:03:47,240 –> 00:03:51,290
But he did so. – Yes, so that is a bad thing, and I will address him in
58
00:03:51,310 –> 00:03:55,330
the debate which follows, for this just can’t be. – The president may have his [private] opinion, but
59
00:03:55,350 –> 00:03:59,460
when he speaks, he speaks on behalf of the European Parliament.
60
00:03:59,480 –> 00:04:03,520
61
00:04:03,540 –> 00:04:07,560
62
00:04:07,580 –> 00:04:11,600
63
00:04:11,620 –> 00:04:15,690
64
00:04:15,710 –> 00:04:19,730
65
00:04:19,750 –> 00:04:23,760
66
00:04:23,780 –> 00:04:27,900
67
00:04:27,920 –> 00:04:31,940
68
00:04:31,960 –> 00:04:36,070
69
00:04:36,090 –> 00:04:40,110
70
00:04:40,130 –> 00:04:44,180
But he doesn’t give me a reply.
71
00:04:44,200 –> 00:04:48,270
Well, he has given a reply. – But this is not a reply? – If you do not accept it, this
72
00:04:48,290 –> 00:04:52,330
is your problem, not our problem. – Pardon? – It is your problem if you don’t accept the reply.
73
00:04:52,350 –> 00:04:56,400
74
00:04:56,420 –> 00:05:00,470
Would you kindly leave
75
00:05:00,490 –> 00:05:04,540
the office now
76
00:05:04,560 –> 00:05:08,600
and switch off the camera. You loose your accreditation
77
00:05:08,620 –> 00:05:12,650
for the European Parliament. May I ask you to go now.
78
00:05:12,670 –> 00:05:16,700
I have another interview with a… –
79
00:05:16,720 –> 00:05:20,740
He simply needs to stop this kind of nonsense.
80
00:05:20,760 –> 00:05:24,780
Respectively offer his apologies, no? – He needs to tell the parliament:
81
00:05:24,800 –> 00:05:28,860
I did not speak on your behalf – fullstop.