One in three newborns of non-European origin. Geographically one finds France in Europe, but demographically the country is swiftly drifting towards Africa as recent data indicates. France, unlike America, does not hold censuses on ethnicity, but follows instead its ideal of the color-blind republic. This, obviously, does not change one bit the ethnic reality on the ground, but it certainly helps to keep its citizens in the dark about it. No official figures exist on the size of the immigrant population and the native French – until now. Pertinent material has come from quite an unexpected source, medicine, and it has all the hallmarks of allowing us for the first time an adequately precise and unbiased look into the strong growth of the non-White population in France.
Since 2000, the country has conducted a nationwide program of neonatal screening for sickle cell disease (SCD). SCD is a genetic disease by and large peculiar to non-European people. However, due to Third World immigration it has become the most common genetic disorder in today’s France. The medical survey provides us with even more data, namely a breakdown per region . We learn that in 2010, 60 percent of newborns in the Ile de France, essentially Paris, descended from non-Europeans. In Provence Alpe du Sud, where Le Pen’s Front National is particularly strong, the non-White share was 43.2 percent; in neighbouring Languedoc Roussillon 41.6 percent. The lowest share was recorded in the Bretagne, 5.5 percent.
It may therefore be no coincidence that France, again like America, is among the first Western countries to fell demographic victim to its own negation of culture and ethnicity. In a way, history has come full circle: what France originally exported as an idea, the radically culture-blind republic, leaves her now helpless to come to grips with its own rapid de-Europeanization – the revolution devours its children, for good.The bitter irony is that these population figures suggest that France has been more radically changed by its former colonies than it ever changed the face of them. The Africanization of France (Se også Drépanocytose et recensements ethniques (rediff) marts 2012.)
“Ved Koranen, vi dræber jer allesammen, bøsserøve”
Several people were slightly injured when a homophobic attack occurred in the early hours of Saturday morning, at the entrance of club Cud, in the gay Marais area of Paris, France. One of the victims, Alexandre Marcel, the vice president of IDAHO (International Day Against Homophobia) charity was among the injured. Marcel described to the French press the attack: ‘At 2.30 in the morning, I left the bar to smoke a cigarette with my partner, when five guys arrived and started to hit the bouncers, saying: ‘by the Quran, we will kill you all, you faggots!
“I wanted to return to the club to take refuge. One of the bouncers who was bleeding a lot asked me to call the police. When one of the attackers saw that I started calling the police and sprayed my face with a pepper based tear-gas. Marcel recounted: ‘the attacker told me “that’ll teach you a lesson to call the police you faggot! . . . The worse thing is, that the bouncers told me that they won’t file a complaint with the police because the attackers won’t be found anyway,” Marcel filed a complaint to the police station the 3rd district of Paris, giving a description of the five attackers as of North African origin (Maghreb).Muslim extremists in tear gas gay Marais attack
Få det så overstået!
Jeg tør roligt sige, at min interesse er omvendt proportionalt med mediernes, og det er ikke kun fordi jeg pr. definition hader valgkampe. To multimillionærer der slås om at få 50 % af befolkningen hen og stemme i USA’s hidtil dyreste valgkamp – seks milliarder dollars! Obama vinder, men jeg håber på Romney, og det er udelukkende fordi det ville ærgre europæiske leftists, hvormed jo næsten menes alle. Men når syv ud af ti af 50 mio latinos stemmer demokratisk, og de vælter ind i landet, så burde republikanerne ikke kunne vinde mere i al fremtid. En ét-parti tilstand ville kunne spare USA for milliarder af valgdollars. Men få det så overstået for denne gang! Så er der kun to år til midtvejsvalget 2014, hvis det kan trøste nogen. David Gress skrev forleden:
Før ethvert præsidentvalg i USA hører man til ulidelighed fra begge kandidater, at netop dette valg bliver et for republikken og verden afgørende. Vinder jeg, siger begge, vil USA blomstre; vinder min modstander, ser det ilde ud. Alle valg er naturligvis ikke lige vigtige. Til de utvivlsomme skæbnevalg i USAs historie tæller dem i 1860, 1932 og 1980, ikke ret mange andre. Hvor rangerer 2012? Naturligvis har politikerne en interesse i at opgejle stemningen for at få deres vælgere af huse. På den anden side er der faktisk et par sager, der kunne gøre dette valg meget vigtigt. Det drejer sig om indvandrings- og miljøpolitik. De to sager er imidlertid stort set fraværende i valgkampen.
The 2012 election will not only be the most expensive election in U.S. history, the cost will tower over the next most expensive election by more than $700 million.
Earlier this year, the Center for Responsive Politics estimated that the 2012 election would cost $5.8 billion — an estimate that already made it the most expensive in history — but with less than a week to go before the election, CRP is revising the estimate upwards. According to CRP’s new analysis of Federal Election Commission data, this election will likely cost $6 billion. 2012 Election Spending Will Reach $6 Billion, Center for Responsive Politics Predicts. 2012 Election Spending Will Reach $6 Billion, Center for Responsive Politics Predicts – Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard: Blot 4 pct. af danskerne ville stemme på Romney – Obama er stadig mediedarling.