24
maj
Seneste opdatering: 24/5-13 kl. 1118
14 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

Man kan se på screenshot her, hvor tæt Adebolajos stormangreb kommer på politibilen, før to kugler fra bagsædet af bilen stopper ham.(sekund 0:07 i video) – føreren sidder i højre side og er i overhængende fare, da hun ikke kan trække sit våben hurtigt nok. De to jihadister ventede altså på politiet for at gå til angreb på dem og evt. lide martydøden, hvad de desværre ikke gjorde.

The brave WPC first on the scene at the Woolwich beheading comes within inches of death, a dramatic Daily Mirror video shows.The footage reveals how, after beheading the soldier, they set up their ambush bid to murder the first police officers to arrive.

The driver, unable to draw her firearm, is saved by a male colleague in the back who fires his machine-gun through his window at a suspect who is charging at her. When they see the first police car arrive, the pair split up.

Blade-wielding Michael Adebolajo, 28, runs at officers head-on and his accomplice, named locally as 22-year-old Michael Oluwatobi Adebowale, advances alongside, aiming his gun at them. The film of the 10 seconds of terror shows how Adebolajo got within two feet of the WPC who was driving the armed response BMW X5. As he is sent sprawling to the ground by the force of the two shots, two officers jump out to cover him.

They appear not to see Adebowale aiming a handgun at them.But a third SO19 marksman from the specialist Trojan unit spots him and he is brought to the ground as six more shots ring out in the suburban South East London street. Woolwich attack: Watch shocking video of terrorists charging at police car in attempt to kill WPC (Der er flere screenshots på The Mail.)

UMP (Sarkozy) politiker: Femtekolonne kan kaste os ud i borgerkrig

“The cowardly attack of the Islamists against a British soldier in London might finally open the eyes of the naive English and others who preach tolerance towards religious extremists and guarantee their freedom of expression.”

“In a world that has become totally transnational, without borders, we now need to recgonise that Islamist assassins are a fifth column present in all the suburbs of Europe.” The MP calls for “drawing all the conclusions” from this murder, “on the legal level, with regards to nationality and procedures for being stripped of it, but also with regard to the communitarian tendencies which can no longer be tolerated.”

“Let us look reality in the face. If not, the worst is to be feared in future. Civil war is waiting for us.” Le Parisien via Woolwich Attack:French MP Warns of “Civil War” and “Islamist Assassins … a Fifth Column Present in All the Suburbs of Europe”

Vores ledere fortæller os, at vi ikke ser det, vi ser

Coren og Spencer diskuterer London – og Stockholm – lidt alternativ baggrundsforståelse. I aftes var der endnu en ørkesløs SVT debat om opstandene i Sverige, som jeg pinte mig igennem og lovede mig, var sidste gang. Der er ikke én deltager i disse amatørdiskussioner, som er i nærheden af hvor tampen brænder: At der er ikke så få i de svenske forstæder, der ikke vil se en repræsentant for den vantro stats myndigheder i de områder, der er under deres kontrol nu. Hvadenten det er ambulancefolk, brandmænd, politifolk eller entreprenører, sådan er det også til daglig i de områder. I realiteten en krigserklæring, men da ingen opfanger den, får den lov at blive mere og mere akut. En dræbt svensk politi- eller brandmand kan forekomme hvilken dag som helst, det skal Reinfeldt og hans kolleger nok sørge for kun kan gå for langsomt

En DN journalist forklarer, hvor ivrigt korpset er for ikke at dække opstanden på en måde, der kan fremme “främlingsfientligheten”, hvor jeg mener den dækkes på en måde, der sørger for ikke at fremme politikerfjendtligheden, men derimod journalistfjendligheden. Man tror simpelthen det er løgn, når man hører dette interview med Stockholms politimester – én lang journalistbebrejdelse af politiet.

An eye for an eye ?

Imposing a “Narrative” on Boston, Stockholm, and London

Yesterday Vlad Tepes interviewed Maj. Stephen Coughlin (ret.), an accomplished American expert on Islamic law, about the ongoing riots in the suburbs of Stockholm, what had just happened in London, and what happened in Boston last month.

Maj. Coughlin describes the ways in which Western political leaders and the media impose a “narrative” on jihad attacks to dissociate them from Islam and make them appear something other than what they obviously are:

GoV

Dutch anxiety over ‘Sharia triangle’ police no-go area in The Hague

Area two kilometres from city centre has become ‘orthodox Muslim territory’ largely ignored by authorities. There have been calls for an urgent debate in the Dutch parliament about the integration of Muslim immigrants amid claims that one area of The Hague, known locally as “the Sharia triangle”, is being run by a form of unofficial Sharia police.

The claims relate to the district of Schilderswijk, about two kilometres from the city centre, where an almost entirely Muslim population of some 5,000 people surrounds the El Islam mosque, fuelling criticism that the government has failed to ensure a proper ethnic mix in schools and local housing. One recent investigation, in which local people were extensively interviewed, concluded that Schilderswijk had become “orthodox Muslim territory” which was now largely ignored by the city authorities, by politicians and even by the police, on the grounds that it had become self-regulating. The investigation found that orthodox Muslims had become so dominant that they were dictating what people in the neighbourhood wore and how they behaved. Irish Times

Annoncer fra Danske Partner-Ads:


Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

  • Varmt Konservativ (kr)

    Jag skulle inte kalla jihadisterna en femte kolonn. De är rätt öppna med vad de vill.

    Här är ett exempel på hur den verkliga femte kolonnen arbetar – och javisst, deras mål är att kasta oss ut i ett folkmord:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323475304578501581991103 070.html?mod=trending_now_1

  • Bjovulf

    Brittiska UD varnar ( resonärer till Sverige )

    Hvis / Om man havde fortalt den svenske befolkning for 20-30 år siden,
    at det ville blive sådan her i fremtidens PK-multi-kulti-Sverige, så ville de
    simpelthen have nægtet at tro på det.

    http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/brittiska-ud-varnar

    På grund av förortsupploppen i Stockholmstrakten utfärdar brittiska UD en
    resevarning för Sverige, och radar upp var oroligheter har förekommit.

  • Varmt Konservativ (kr)
  • Bjovulf

    Mange tak 😉

    Fra den tragikomiske afdeling:

    Svensk uromager: »Jeg vil gerne være brandmand«
    [ Nå, det er måske ligefrem sådan en slags forberedende praktikophold, han er ude i? 😉 ]

    http://politiken.dk/udland/ECE1978561/svensk-uromager-jeg-vil-gerne-va ere-brandmand/

    Internationalt 24. maj. 2013 KL. 11.48

    Den sigtede 18-årige blev anholdt i mandags efter sammenstød med betjente, hvor han er anklaget for at overfalde en politibetjent ved hjælp af en sten på størrelse med en håndbold. Anklageren hævder, at den unge var maskeret og optrådte aggressivt ved konfrontationen med ordensmagten.

    Kommet på andre tanker
    Det var derimod en beklemt teenager, der øjensynligt var kommet på andre tanker ved gårsdagens retsmøde, skriver Aftonbladet. De beskriver den unge som tydeligt nervøs og siger, at han havde svært ved at sætte ord på, hvad han lavede, da han blev anholdt.

    Den 18-årige gymnasieelev [!!!] havde siddet varetægtsfængslet siden i mandags.

    »Jeg har det dårligt. Jeg har kigget på en væg i tre dage«, sagde han.
    [ Ja, det er rigtigt god træning for dig – væn dig til det 😉 ]

  • Bjovulf

    P1 Debat: Vil lettere statsborgerskab føre til masseindvandring?

    Søren Espersen (DF) vs. Karina Lorentzen (SF)

    http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2013/05/24/102759.htm

    I P1 debat er teamet lempelsen i reglerne for de udlændinge, der gerne vil være danske statsborgere.

    [ Ja, ellers bare spørg kommentarskriverne 😉 ]

  • Morani ya Simba

    “Vores ledere fortæller os, at vi ikke ser det, vi ser”

    Ja det er faktisk hvad de gør. Politikerne er psykisk grusomme i samme forstand som et ældre barn der leger psykisk med et mindre barn ved at benægte et eller andet oplagt som fx. at en rød bil er rød for at få det mindre barn til at tvivle på hele sit verdenssyn.

    Ang. den engelske soldat så er der en eller anden grænse der blev brudt i forgårs. Jeg tror ikke forandringen vil kunne ses umiddelbart. Men jeg tror vi er i nyt territorium. I forgårs gik vi igennem en dør vi ikke kan træde tilbage igennem.

    • Hvorfor gik vi ikke gennem den dør, da en fransk muslim dræbte et par soldater og slagtede jødiske børn for et års tid siden?

      Relativt set var disse to terrorister da mere venligtsindede, angreb kun militær og politi, beklagede at kvinder måtte være vidner til dette mord.

      Den franske terrorist, for genopfriske hukommelsen, greb fat en lille jødisk pige og fastholdt hende, så han kunne ramme hende i hovedet og være sikker på, at hun døde. Den eneste måde, man kan synke dybere end dette, er ved at dræbe langt flere børn på samme måde eller værre.

      Jeg synes personligt ikke noget kan overraske mere, efter Beslan er det eneste, der har overrasket mig da Breivik. At en modstander mod Islam kunne bruge præcis samme kyniske og bestialske metode og dræbe børn.

      • Lige for at sætte trumf på, pigen var 8 år, han greb hende i håret, pistolen jammede, så han måtte gribe en ny pistol og så bang – ingen stopklods:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toulouse_and_Montauban_shootings

      • Morani ya Simba

        Fair nok, point taken. Mordet på børnene du beskriver er endnu værre moralsk. Til gengæld er halshugning på offenlig gade inflammerende I sin egen ret. Jeg ved langt mere om det engelske samfund end om det franske og det tror jeg mange i Europa og ude i verden gør. Derfor vil dette resonere mere og længere ud. Jeg indrømmer at der er de her slags episoder hvor man tænker “nu vågner folk” og efter 3 dages nyhedsdækning er intet sket. Fx. angrebet på OUH I Danmark og andre episoder. Så dagen derpå, her på denne højhellige lørdag, har jeg mine tvivl om UK virkelig står af katastrofetoget. Eller om nogen af os andre gør.

        • Et eller andet sted, så kan man stille det her spørgsmål; Hvis noget skal være et tippingpoint, kræver det så noget værre end 9/11?

        • Morani ya Simba

          “Et eller andet sted, så kan man stille det her spørgsmål; Hvis noget skal være et tippingpoint, kræver det så noget værre end 9/11?”

          Det er ikke sikkert. Når frustrationer, konflikt, gensidig mistro osv. har bygget sig op kan det være en isoleret set “mindre” episode der sætter ild til krudttønden. To eksempler er mordet i Sarajevo i 1914 der udløser en grotesk brutal krig og Hitler der først får lov at fortære det demokratiske Tjekkoslovakiet hvorefter Storbritanien går i krig for det kvasi-fascistiske styre i Polen i 1939 (der iøvrigt selv tog for sig af retterne da Tjekkoslovakiet skulle likvideres.) Jo mere anspændt situationen bliver jo mindre gnist kan antænde den. Det garanterer også at der vil komme en alvorlig reaktion på et eller andet tidspunkt. Nøgen og grotesk aggression bliver til sidst for meget for en kritisk masse af befolkningen. (Jeg er dog stadig nervøs for om Europa glider direkte fra “det er ikke et problem” direkte over i “vi kan lige så godt overgive os for modstand er for sent nu”. Men vi, og resten af planeten får at se. Det ender rigtigt grimt tør jeg godt love.)

  • Jutta

    Man knivskuren utanför pizzeria
    Gärningsmannen viftade med kniven på gatan
    En man har knivskurits utanför en pizzeria i Helsingborg….
    http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article16840142.ab

  • Allan Hansen

    Nu kan man læse M. A Khan bog online.

    Islamic slavery has been the most horrible, yet the least known slavery in history. So, author M. A. Khan decided to publish the chapter “Islamic Slavery” from his book “Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery”. This part contains: 1) INTRODUCTION, 2) THE QURANIC SANCTION OF SLAVERY, 3) THE PROPHETIC MODEL OF SLAVERY. (Part 2)

    ————————————-

    “Allah sets forth (another) Parable of two men: one of them dumb, with no power of any sort; a wearisome burden is he to his master; whichever way he directs him, he brings no good: is such a man equal with one who commands Justice, and is on a Straight Way?” — Allah, in Quran 16:76

    “(Allah) brought those of the People of the Scripture… and cast panic into their hearts. Some (adult males) ye slew, and ye made captive some (women and children).” — Allah, in Quran 33:26–27

    “It is written in the Quran that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their (Muslims’) authority were sinners; that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners; and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” — Tripoli’s London ambassador Abd al-Rahman to Thomas Jefferson & John Adams (1786) on by what right the Barbary States enslaved American seamen.

    ——————————-

    INTRODUCTION

    The cover image shows Muhammad & his followers on a
    Jihad raid, in which he used to plunder and capture the
    women and children as slaves.
    Slavery is a socio-economic institution, in which some human individuals, called slaves, become property of others, called masters or owners. Devoid of freedom and liberty, slaves are expected to provide loyal and diligent service for the comfort and economic well-being of their masters. Deprived of any human rights, slaves are the unconditional possession of their owners: mere chattels, having no right to leave, refuse work, or receive compensation for their labor. The position of slaves in society in many respects is akin to that of domesticated animals. Just as cows, horses and other beasts of burden are trained and utilized for economic advantage, such as for pulling carts or plowing fields—slaves are exploited for the benefit, comfort and economic well-being of the owner. Slave-trade, integral to slavery, involves buying and selling of human beings as a commodity like any other commercial transaction. Slavery, in essence, is the exploitation of the weak by the strong and has a very long history.

    One major criticism of the West by all, and particularly by Muslims, pertains to the trans-Atlantic slave‑trade by European powers and their mindless exploitation and degrading treatment of slaves in the Americas and West Indies. Muslims are often quick to point fingers at the European slave-trade; they often claim that the exploitation of slaves enabled countries like the United States to amass the huge wealth they enjoy today. One young Muslim, born in America, wrote: ‘Do you know how the American slave-hunters went to Africa, seized the black people and brought them to America as slaves? America’s economic power owes a great deal to the labor of those slaves’ (personal communication). Terming the 350-year trans-Atlantic slave-trade ‘the worst and most cruel slavery’ in history, the Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan claims that some white Americans do not know that ‘they are in the privileged position… today based on what happened to us (Blacks)’ in the past.[1] An overwhelming majority of Muslims believe that Islamic history is devoid of the abhorrent practice of slavery. Rocky Davis (aka Shahid Malik), an Australian Aboriginal convert to Islam, told the ABC Radio that ‘Christianity were the founders of slavery. Not Islam.’[2] When Muslims in India talk about the practice of slavery in the subcontinent—they talk about the harrowing tales of how the Portuguese transported slaves from coastal areas of Goa, Kerala and Bengal in terrible conditions. It is already noted that history books in Pakistan teach that before Islam, there was exploitation and slavery, which vanished with the coming of Islam. They will never talk about the slavery that Muslim invaders and rulers practiced on a grand scale in India.

    This Muslim silence about the widespread practice slavery under Islamic rules, such as in India, likely results from their ignorance of historical facts. In modern history writing in India, there is extensive whitewashing of the atrocities that took place during the Muslim invasions and the subsequent Islamic rule. Such distortions of the true picture of Islamic history compound Muslims’ ignorance about Islamic atrocities in medieval India and create an erroneous perception amongst them about the extensive slavery practised by Muslim rulers. As recounted throughout this book, slavery was regrettably a prominent institution throughout the history of Islamic domination everywhere. It also had unique features, namely large-scale concubinage, eunuchs, and ghilman (described below).

    ___________________________

    THE QURANIC SANCTION OF SLAVERY

    The institution of slavery in Islam was formalized in the following Quranic verse, in which Allah distinguishes free human beings or masters, who exercise justice and righteousness, from the dumb, useless and burdensome ones, the slaves:

    Allah sets forth (another) Parable of two men: one of them dumb, with no power of any sort; a wearisome burden is he to his master; whichever way he directs him, he brings no good: is such a man equal with one who commands Justice, and is on a Straight Way? [Quran 16:76]

    Allah warns the believers against taking the slaves as equal partner in status and in sharing their wealth, lest they have to fear them as anyone else:

    …do ye have partners among those whom your right hands possess (i.e., slaves, captives) to share as equals in the wealth We have bestowed on you? Do ye fear them as ye fear each other? [Quran 30:28][3]

    Allah recognizes some human beings, namely the masters, as more blessed by Himself than the less favored slaves as part of His divine plan. He warns Muslims against sharing His gifts to them equally with their slaves. Those who would take slaves as equal, warns Allah, would deny Him:

    Allah has bestowed His gifts of sustenance more freely on some of you than on others: those more favoured are not going to throw back their gifts to those whom their right hands possess, so as to be equal in that respect. Will they then deny the favours of Allah? [Quran 16:71]

    Allah does not only sanction the institution of slavery, He also gave divine blessing to masters (Muslim men only can own slaves) to have sex with the female slaves:

    And those who guard their private parts, Except in the case of their wives or those whom their right hands possess—for these surely are not to be blamed [Quran 70:29–30]

    And who guard their private parts, except before their mates or those whom their right hands possess, for they surely are not blameable [Quran 23:5–6]

    Therefore, if there are women amongst the captives or slaves, Muslims are divinely sanctioned to have sex with them as they do with their wives. This verdict of Allah founded the institution of sex-slavery or slave-concubinage in Islam, which was widespread in the pre-colonial Muslim world and continued well into the mid-twentieth century. As far as legal marriage is concerned, there is a limitation of four wives for a man at one time [Quran 4:3], but no such limitation on the number of sex-slaves.

    Allah also gave a divine sanction to Muslims for acquiring female slaves for sexual engagement by waging wars against the infidels:

    O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war… [Quran 33:50]

    Muslims can engage in sex with the captured slave women even if they are married, but not with the married free Muslim women:

    Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess… [Quran 4:24].

    There are other verses in the Quran that talks approvingly of slaves and capturing them in wars. Thus, according to the divine commands of the Islamic God as enshrined in the holy Quran, Muslims are allowed to keep slaves. They can amass slaves by waging wars, have sex with the female slaves, and of course, use them as they wish. For Muslims, having sex with female slaves is as legal as having sex with their married wives. Slavery appears to be one of the most desired divine privileges in Islam, since Allah took the pain of reminding Muslims about this divine right time and again in so many verses.

    ___________________________

    THE PROPHETIC MODEL OF SLAVERY

    Allah did not rest with repeatedly reminding Muslims to engage in slavery, but also took the initiative to guide Prophet Muhammad on how to enslave the infidels, such as in the following verse:

    And He (Allah) brought those of the People of the Scripture (i.e., Banu Qurayza) who supported them (i.e., the Quraysh) down from their strongholds, and cast panic into their hearts. Some (adult males) ye slew, and ye made captive some (women and children)… [Quran 33:26–27]

    In this verse, Allah charged the Banu Qurayza Jews with supporting the Quraysh of Mecca “from their strongholds” against Muslims in the battle of the Trench (627). Based on this unsubstantiated accusation, Allah commanded that some of the Jews, the adult males, were to be slain, and the rest, the women and children, enslaved. The Prophet duly complied with this divine command. He distributed the enslaved women and children among his disciples, himself acquiring one-fifth of them. The young and pretty ones amongst the female captives were made sex-slaves; the Prophet himself took beautiful Rayhana, whose husband and family members had been slain in the massacre. He took her to bed on the same night.[4]

    After conquering Khaybar the following year, Muhammad carried away their women and children as slaves. In many other attacks, the Prophet and his followers enslaved and carried away the women and children of the vanquished. Therefore, after aggressively attacking and defeating the infidels, enslaving the women and children became a model of Muhammad’s wars. Some of the slaves could be sold or ransomed for generating revenues. The young and pretty ones amongst the female captives became sex-slaves.

    Since emulating Muhammad in action and deed is central to living a good Muslim life in Islamic thought, Muslims duly embraced his model of slavery (comprising enslavement, slave-trade and slave-concubinage) and perpetuated it during the later centuries of Islamic domination. Muhammad’s example of dealing with the Jews of Banu Qurayza or Khaybar became the standard template for capturing slaves. This led to a massive rise in enslavement, sex-slavery and slave-trade in medieval Islamdom. After Muhammad’s death, Muslims—armed with sanctions of the Quran and Sunnah—embarked on an unbridled mission of waging holy war to conquer the world for the purpose of spreading Islam and expanding Islamic rule. As Islam burst out of Arabia, Muslim invaders became adept at capturing the vanquished infidels, particularly the women and children, in large numbers as slaves.

    In Islamic thoughts (as noted already), the civilizations preceding and outside of Islam are jahiliyah or erroneous in nature, invalidated with the coming of Islam. Only Muslims were in the sole possession of truth in the form of the true faith of Islam. In their thoughts, the world outside the boundary and religion of Islam, notes Bernard Lewis, ‘was inhabited by the infidels and barbarians. Some of these were recognized as possessing some form of religion and a tincture of civilization. The remainder, polytheists and idolaters, were seen primarily as sources of slaves.’[5] Muslims captured slaves in such great numbers that slave-trade became a booming business enterprise; markets across the Muslim world became teeming with slaves. Accordingly, ‘it goes to the credit of Islam to create slave trade on a large scale, and run it for profit like any other business,’ writes Lal.[6]