Det er svært at vide, hvad der er foregået i kulisserne. Man hører nogle falske toner ind i mellem. Det virker utænkeligt som om britiske myndigheder ikke skulle have en finger med i spillet, han ligner én, der har fået et tilbud, han ikke kunne afslå. Det siver måske ud pø om pø. Lars Hedegaard: LEDARE: ”The night they drove Tommy down”
Englands ende sanne arbetarklassledare på många årtionden, Tommy Robinson, har oskadliggjorts och man kan bara ana den press han varit utsatt för. Han har fått utstå fysiska attacker, har han gripits och fängslats gång på gång, framställts som ett avskum av en enig press och ställts inför sin egen familjs undergång. Det verkar uppenbart att han har blivit tvingat till en uppgörelse med regeringen, vilken innebär att han inte längre ska sätta sig upp emot den totalitära ideologin islam utan koncentrera sina ansträngningar till ”islamismen” – som framställs som själva antitesen till Muhammeds kärleksfulla budskap. Man undrar om vi någonsin mer kommer att se den forne Tommy Robinsons like.
Enza Ferreri: VIDEO IMAGE OF BRITAIN’S COLONISATION
If this is not the essence of colonialism I don’t know what is.
A bunch of non-British pontificating on what the core values of Britain are or should be. We have here, on a BBC programme, one of the endless series of debates on “what is Britishness” that have been part of the UK public discourse only since the arrival on these shores of vast numbers of people belonging to the ethnic, religious and geographic groups represented by most debaters in this video.
Can you imagine 60, 100, 200 years ago people having discussions on what Britishness was? Everybody knew what it was until mass, uncontrolled immigration from the Third World started and never stopped. I found this comment to the video on YouTube spot on:
“all because you non-whites have a British accent it doesn’t make u British”.
That being born and bred in this country does not provide a national identity or guarantee national loyalty, as is too often wrongly accepted, is demonstrated by an Asian man in this discussion. He openly declares that he was born and educated in Britain but nevertheless his sense of identity is precisely not having that identity, indeed he goes as far as saying that Britishness means not having an identity.
He was also very good at tying himself in (il)logical knots when he told a Hindu woman that her way of thinking was “unBritish”. How can you define what is unBritish if you haven’t defined British, since in his opinion that word is tantamount to nothing?
It’s disingenuous of ‘Professor of Poetry’ Benjamin Zephaniah to say that multiculturalism has been part of Britain since the time of the ancient Celts, Picts and Romans, although that claim is a staple of the usual pro-multi-culti argument.
What he’s referring to was not multiculturalism. That was war of different peoples against each other. The Celts were in Britain first, then they were conquered by the Romans. After the Romans eventually left, the Celts fought against the Angles and the Saxons, and finally retreated to Wales, Scotland and Cornwall. Then it was the turn of the Vikings to war with the Anglo-Saxons, and after them the Normans invaded and dominated England.
It was violence and invasion, and it was bloody.
Make no mistake. Current immigration levels and the imposition of multiculturalism are entirely new historical phenomena without any precedent not only in the history of Britain but also of Europe.
It is an experiment carried out on the skin of the indigenous populations. Like all experiments, it can very badly go wrong, and there are numerous signs everywhere that it is.
And, as the TV debate in the video above truthfully represents, the natives are marginalised voices in this experiment and the decisions made about it, while the ethnic (for now) minorities have a much greater weight. This video shows the new reality of the country: invasion and colonisation. Liberty GB