1
jan
Seneste opdatering: 1/1-14 kl. 1434
6 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

download

300 av landets ledarskribenter och politiska journalister som röstar i DSM Sveriges Viktigaste Opinionsbildare 2013. Man kan synes, Julia Caesars placering er mÊrkelig for en skribent, der officielt ikke eksisterer, men der er sÄ meget mÊrkeligt pÄ spil i Sverige. Det er vel en af grundene til, at jeg er blevet hÊngende.

“Punished for being punished”

This outright hypocrisy was shown to an extreme level in a case which has just occurred in Sweden. It doesn’t appear to involve the Swedish government/ state itself, although I don’t know enough about Sweden to tell you whether or not Expressen (a Swedish newspaper) and Researchgruppen (a leftist ‘research group’) – the two culprits – have any direct or indirect links to the Swedish state. My guess is that it’s highly likely that they do, especially as the case involves ‘hate sites’ and the incendiary issues of Islam and mass immigration.

Earlier this month Jyllands-Posten – Denmark’s favourite newspaper – ran a couple of critical pieces about Sweden’s self-consciously suicidal policy on mass immigration. (What some countries are prepared to do in order to prove their piously progressive credentials!) One piece, by Morten Uhrskov Jensen, talked about Sweden’s “insane immigration policy”. Another article, entitled “A Land of Ghosts and Shadows” and written by a Mikael Jayling, dealt with asylum smuggling, immigration and crime, sharia law, the costs of immigration, the leftist/ progressive use of the word ‘racism’ to silence any and all critical discussion of Islam and immigration, the silence and hypocrisy of Swedish feminists (who only care about misogyny and sexism when it is carried out by people with white skin) and so on.

Because alternative views on immigration, Islam and much else are very rarely tolerated in the progressive land of Sweden, it will come as no surprise that in response to Mikael Jayling’s article (as well as the others), leftist Internet snoopers and monitors decided to get to work on the problem. More precisely, the Swedish daily, Expressen, told its readers that its editors had collaborated with a Swedish ‘research group’ called Researchgruppen. Why did it do so? Because both Expressen and Researchgruppen wanted to discover and then publish the names of the readers of various Internet news outlets which audaciously dared to contradict or criticise Sweden’s official, progressive line.

Predictably, these sources of alternative news (Avpixlat, Fria Tider, and Exponerat) were classed as “hate sites” (i.e., websites not completely in tune with what they believe) by these often very hateful and zealous leftists. You see, the progressive Left really does completely rely on these soundbite political ad hominems, such as “hate crime” and “Islamophobia”, in order to do the job of silencing all – and I mean all! – alternative or contradictory views.SWEDEN’S PROGRESSIVE SNOOPERS

Geert Wilders’ keynote speech in Australia 2013

0 0 votes
Article Rating


DonĂ©r engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
elwee
elwee
10 years ago

Sanningen sipprar sÄ lÄngsamt ut i det svenska samhÀllet. FördÀmningarna som 7-klövern, kulturmarxisterna och MSM byggt upp uppvisar spricka efter spricka och snart kommer sanningens vatten att flöda över de torra fÀlten.
Det innebÀr att hela medialandskapet kommer att ritas om och en debatt vÀrd namnet kommer att blomstra pÄ Àngarna.

Julia har med sina artiklar skapat en hel del sprickor i nÀmnda fördÀmning och det var lika glÀdjande som överraskande att hon tillerkÀndes en plats bland opinionsbildarna.

GRATTIS Julia!

Nils
Nils
10 years ago

Tvivlsom ĂŠre at havne i dette selskab.

Listen demonstrerer med skrĂŠmmende tydelighed, at juryen, de 300 “finmurvler”, har en stĂŠrkt begrĂŠnset horisont. Det meste er gamle udbollede morgensofakartofler. Kan nogen forklare, hvad Leif GW Persson laver nĂŠsten helt i toppen af listen.

Nils
Nils
10 years ago
Reply to  steen

Det var skam ikke for at kritisere budbringeren, initiativet er prisvĂŠrdigt og resultatet som sagt intressant.

Utflyttad svensk
Utflyttad svensk
10 years ago

Julia skulle varit nummer ett.

Angela
Angela
10 years ago

Grattis Julia! Det Ă€r bĂ„de roligt och komiskt att hon blivit framröstad av 300 av landets ledarskribenter och politiska journalister! MĂ„nga ledarskribenter och journalister tycks gilla “hatsajter”! 😀

Sedan har jag alltid tyckt att pÄhittet med att rösta om viktigaste opinionsbildare knappast Àr ledarskribenters och journalisters uppgift. Korruption skulle jag vilja kalla det. VÀnskapskorruption. Eller kanske rent av höjden av narcissism och sjÀlvgodhet. Och HUR vet man vilka som pÄverkar folk? Det Àr enfaldigt trams. Hur mÄnga ibland Sveriges befolkning har ens möjligheten att bli en opinionsbildare? Det verkar mer vara en klubb för inbördes beundran.

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x