29
jan
Seneste opdatering: 30/1-14 kl. 1212
10 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

weston snaphanen

By Paul Weston, Liberty, GB

A world controlled by the wicked and immoral Left is a very unpleasant place in which to live. At the furthest extremity of Left-wingery we have genocide, totalitarianism, Gulags and evil. At the softer end of Left-wingery we have propaganda, lies, MSNBC, smears, the BBC, hatred of tradition and decency, and the concomitant incremental demise of the Western democracy historically defended by millions of our young men who now lie in graves both marked and unmarked across the Western world.

Unfortunately for the decent, intelligent and moral people today, the Left have largely carried out their Long March and now control the institutions which form the thoughts and opinions of the vast majority of Western peoples. He who controls the media and the educational establishment controls the past, the present, and the future, just as Hitler, Stalin and their present day Socialist comrades-in-arms intended.

To really see what this means in 2014, we need look no further than the case of Anders Behring Breivik, the counter-jihad movement, and the truly obscene behaviour of the Leftist media – particularly so in Scandinavian countries.

In 2011 Breivik carried out his murderous spree, to the shock and horror of all decent people everywhere. The Leftist media however, which had already made up its mind about certain individuals within the counter-jihad movement, sought to use this act of evil purely to mount an assault upon high profile individuals whose “crime” was to peacefully and accurately draw attention to the dangers involved in allowing a barbaric ideology by the name of Islam to flourish both demographically and “culturally” within the cohesive, peaceful and Christian West.

I am not going to go into forensic detail about the actions of the Leftist media, which have been covered in depth already by Robert Spencer, Baron Bodissey at Gates of Vienna, and Fjordman, all of whom were viciously attacked by Left-wing journalists who were outraged (rightly so) by the actions of Breivik, but who had all remained smugly mute for years over the numerically far higher number of murders carried out in the name of Islam or Socialism.

Just to give a couple of typical examples, the Guardian newspaper, chock full of wicked Leftists, remarked that America had been given the bloody nose she so manifestly deserved on 9/11, whilst the BBC bent over backwards to excuse Islam whilst reducing the then U.S. Ambassador to tears in front of a baying mob of specifically imported Muslims and Leftists within a BBC studio.

But why such overt double standards over two acts of similar atrocity? Why the total failure to hold up the Koran and the hadith for 9/11? And why the massive, concerted and hysterical smear campaign against Bodissey, Spencer and Fjordman?

The answer of course is because the Left wish to use Islam as a pawn in the breakdown of Western Nation States, Christianity, and free enterprise-AKA capitalism. An orderly, affluent, peaceful, civilised country contains very few potential voters for the far- Left, so even if Islam did not exist, the Left would have to invent it – and then eagerly import it. There can be no better ideological ally if the intention is to manufacture social unrest and potential civil war, which justifies ever-increasing authoritarianism prior to the eventual full blown Leftist totalitarianism necessary to keep a lid on things.

Hence the smearing of the counter-jihad, and the politically deceitful defence of the so called religion of peace. But in a rational and sane world (ie: a non-Leftist world) there is one overwhelming and striking difference between the gentle, polite, articulate and well informed output of the counter-jihad movement, and the murderous actions of both Breivik and similarly violent Muslim supremacists, which is starkly simple – Bodissey, Spencer and Fjordman have never once called for violence to be inflicted upon Muslims or Leftists, but Muslims and Leftists routinely call for (and practice) violence upon those they disagree with.

Which, over a long and meandering route, brings me to the point of this article, which is the near total refusal of the MSM to publicise the recent Breivik letter to the MSM where he essentially admits he considers the counter-jihad movement to be comprised of a bunch of panty-waisted individuals with no appetite for killing, no admiration for Nazism, no desire for violence and perhaps even worse, a sympathy for Israel. Ho ho ho, he says, I have attempted to discredit the entire movement which I hate with a passion for its passive, intellectual, peaceful approach to the Islamic problem, and I have been greatly assisted by the cretinous Leftist media……

Breivik is positively gloating over the ease with which he pulled the wool over the Leftist media’s eyes, but he should not be so hubristic, because the anti-Western Leftist media actively wanted to be deliberately blinded to truth, reason, decency and fact. And what then, is the outcome of this?

Not good is the answer. Not good for anyone. Mild mannered, scholarly and peaceful people have been falsely smeared and stigmatised, whilst violent Islam has been falsely defended. And all the while, the anger amongst the peoples of the West continues to build to an eventual future extent where the Bodissey’s, Spencer’s and Fjordman’s of this world – who provide an accurate, impartial and peaceful analysis of our problems – will be replaced by people with an altogether different outlook, as we are already beginning to see in the rise of several real far-right movements in Europe.

So please allow me to offer my most sincere congratulations to the Leftist media. You have attacked the peaceful, native defenders of Western civilisation and labelled them as evil, whilst defending the foreign, violent attackers of Western civilisation, who you disingenuously promote as harmless, virtuous and good.

What a thoroughly evil lot you are. No journalistic integrity; no personal morality and no common, basic decency amongst any of you. Will we see a single one of you publish Breivik’s admission? Of course not, and of course not for a pretty simple reason – you are too immersed in your wicked Leftist activism to behave in a way any normal person outside the all-smothering political Leftist world would recognise as brave, responsible, impartial, good or decent. You are more than a disgrace to your profession; you are a treacherous disgrace to humanity.

For more detailed analysis, please see the following articles:

Robert Spencer: English-Language Media Ignores Breivik’s Coming-Out As A Nazi

Fjordman. Breivik’s Confession and the Media’s Silence

Daniel Greenfield Breivik Opposed Spencer, Fjordman, Exploited Counterjihad for Nazi Goals

GoV: The Breivik Ideology and Media Disinformation

Paul Weston (votepaulweston.com) Jack Buckby and Enza Ferreri of Liberty GB are standing in the European Union elections in May 2014.

Om samme pĂĄ norsk i dag:

Får Sørheim/Husby rett? ABB viser synlige tegn på sinnslidelse

Catch 22

og finsk MSM Teurastaja Breivikin täyskäännös – sanookin olevansa natsi ja yrittäneensä vahingoittaa “vastajihadia”

Artiklen tilsendt. Jeg kan se, den ogsĂĄ er sendt til Gates of Vienna.

0 0 votes
Article Rating


DonĂ©r engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nostradamus_i_norr
Nostradamus_i_norr
10 years ago

Paul Weston is completely right about all what he has written. The ideologies Marxism (communism, cultural marxism, political correctness, socialism, …) is together with islam, the without comparison biggest threats to the western world. Use of violence, falsehood and deception are their means of spreading their ideas. These are also some of the reasons why they find each other, or as the Swedish sayings tells: ”kaka söker maka” and ”lika barn leka bäst”. The political correctness, which originates from the Marxist Frankfurt school, have also penetrated deeply into political parties in Sweden, which former were conservative. The following films are… Read more »

ny kommentator
ny kommentator
10 years ago

Well written… Poul Weston has my utmost respect…..

nadacomprende
nadacomprende
10 years ago

P.Weston is a traitorous cunt.

Paul Weston
10 years ago
Reply to  nadacomprende

Why am I a traiterous cunt, pray tell?

nadacomprende
nadacomprende
10 years ago
Reply to  Paul Weston

Because I’m a retarded drunk who confused you with someone else.
I promise to think and be sober before I write next time. I’ m realy sorry.
Can you forgive me? Keep up the good work. I’m going to be ashamed
for the rest of this year. Sorry sorry sorry.

SkĂĄning
SkĂĄning
10 years ago
Reply to  Paul Weston

Dear Mr Weston, Had I known that you are reading this blog I would have posted my comment in english. I would also want to wish you best of luck. Unlike thw wide mouthed populist Farrage, you always give the impression of being intelligent, educated and straight to the point. I regret that UKIP probably will push back the development for years in brittish politics, when what you (and Europe needs) are parties like Liberty GB. Radical and uncompromising, but no nazi-style ethno-purism either. BTW, I am really curious as to what happened during the break-up between you and the… Read more »

SkĂĄning
SkĂĄning
10 years ago

Jag börjar mer och mer gilla Paul Weston. Han är träffsäker och sparar inte pĂĄ krutet. Känns som Enoch Powell reborn, fast utan den artighet som kanske den tidens “lefties” förtjänade, men dagens knappast gör. Han är faktiskt betydligt mer beläst och intelligent än sĂĄväl Wilders som Le Pen och Farrage.

Nemo
Nemo
10 years ago

I think it is a huge mistake to lend any credence to what Breivik writes. Were we not in agreement that he was barking mad? And now, suddenly, we care what he says? What if, next month, he writes that the king was his secret lover, Fjordman really is his half-brother or whatever he may come up with? Let him rot in peace.

stefan borg
stefan borg
10 years ago
Reply to  Nemo

The point of the article wasn’t about Breivik’s credibility, it was about the media people having an agenda of their own; therefore in the first place, when Breivik’s statements were in accordance with their agenda, the same statements made the headlines and innocent people were burned. The next time Breivik made statements, they were out of accord with the media people’s agenda, and therefore made no headlines, weren’t even mentioned in the media. Breivik is most likely stark raging mad, but for intelligent people to use a madman’s statements to accuse people whose opinions you don’t like, that’s much worse… Read more »

Ludvig
Ludvig
10 years ago
Reply to  stefan borg

Hear, hear!

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x