6
aug
Seneste opdatering: 6/8-17 kl. 0504
14 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

‘Manfoldighed’ à la DR

DR’s tidligere mediedirektør Gitte Rabøl skal rådgive DR’s direktion og bestyrelse om mangfoldighed. Hun ses her flankeret af DR’s generaldirektør og DR’s daværende kanalchef.

Annoncer fra Danske Partner-Ads:


Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

  • Talibananas

    Nu ska vi inte överdramatisera. Den nyanlände båtflyktingen Pelle erövrade ju Bornholm redan 1987.

  • Sussy Hunt

    En af mine venner sagde til mig, at han ville skyde en kugle igennem hjernen på de 3, hvis han havde chancen.

  • Brandmand for Bidermeyer

    Godt jeg ikke betaler licens! Kan I andre sige det samme, eller dukker i nakken, betaler tribut til løgnerne og skræpper op som forvirrede høns?

    • Sussy Hunt

      Nej, ingen betaler til kommunisterne mere. Vi ser jo heller ikke deres kommunistiske lort

    • Lenn

      Jeg ser ikke de islamliderlige, anti-jødiske nazistpropaganda-kanaler fra DR, så hvorfor betale licens…? Nej! Den danske befolkning burde bare ophøre med at betale, så lukker de vel på et tidspunkt.

  • Snowflinga

    Många människor ser vad som händer men Europas politiker och en stor del av media tycks vara förblindade av sin ideologi och har en strategi att förändra kontinenten för evigt. De vill att Europa skall bli multikulturellt, islamiseras och att europeerna skall bli en minoritet i sina egna länder. Pådrivande aktörer som förbundskansler Angela Merkel gör det möjligt och säger att Europa måste ta emot flera migranter och att Islam hör till Europa. Vad gör man med politiker som inte förstår bättre?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMDWAaxFnCA

    Muslimska ledare har förstått att utnyttja situationen till sin fördel och Turkiets president Erdogan har uppmanat turkarna att föda fem barn och säger att framtiden hör till dem i Europa.

    Precis som Julian Assange säger: “you are not being tolerant, not being inclusive, not being openminded you are being conguered.”

    • Sussy Hunt

      De er ikke forblændede. De er alle en del af problemet. Det er en stor sammenhængende gruppe af regeringer, som ejer alt. Alle medier, alle journalister, alle centralbanker, kort sagt alt. Og de eneste som er sikre på altid at tabe er befolkningerne fordi de er fuldstændigt idiotiske, generelt.

      • Snowflinga

        De flesta människor begriper inte omfattningen om vad som pågår utan är nyttiga idioter som är ideologiskt förblindade. Några intellektuella och politiker vill att den postmoderna kulturmarxistiska agendan skall genomföras och utnyttjar människor för deras ändamål. Problemet för dem är de europeiska folken som står ivägen för deras agenda och därför måste européerna subverteras och elimineras.

    • Sussy Hunt
      • Sussy Hunt

        I’ve posted this comment on several other Clinton Scandal related pages. I want to “get it out” so that interested citizens can read one of the original laws that Clinton broke when she put the unencrypted server in her garage. I’ve asked readers to “bear with me if you’ve seen this before;” please read it intently if you haven’t. Pass it along to your network. We have to insist that the Law be followed.”

        18 U.S.C. – Section 793 (f): Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information –

        Also known as the “ESPIONAGE ACT”

        “Whoever, being ENTRUSTED with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the NATIONAL DEFENSE,

        (1) Through GROSS NEGLIGENCE permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or

        (2) HAVING KNOWLEDGE that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and FAILS TO MAKE PROMPT REPORT of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction TO HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER—

        Shall be fined under this title or IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN TEN YEARS, or both.”

        The Secretary of State is mandated by the Federal Records Act and reflected in 5 FAM 400, that the Department must create and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions or operations.

        Comey testified that there were 110 verified violations of CLASSIFIED documents that were not placed in its proper place of custody at the State Department, but instead on a unencrypted server at the Clinton home in New York. Actually, had Comey read the statute, there is no restrictive category of documents etc relating to the National Defense. In other words, ANY document, NOT JUST CLASSIFIED, related to the National Defense is a violation.

        Given that, and the high probability that nearly all official correspondence to/from SecState is related to the National Security and National Defense, the entire server’s 60,000 emails (30,000 destroyed and 30,000 kept) and ANY items, regardless of classification on the server, removed from their proper place or destroyed, were violations of Section 793. Therefore, Clinton faces a maximum of 1,100 years for the verified classified emails, and up to 600,000 years in prison for ALL the emails on her server. And, that is just the beginning of her crimes.

        The FBI reported that Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea and Iran have hacked into the unencrypted server at the Clinton’s home. North Korea and Iran have declared that one of their primary goals is to destroy the United States of America. A compelling case that Clinton installing the server was an act of treason could be made.

        The evidence is overwhelming that Hillary Clinton committed acts of illegally removing and short circuiting documents from being stored in their proper place.

        INTENT, as Comey argues, is not a deciding factor in whether these crimes were committed. HAVING KNOWLEDGE or through GROSS NEGLIGENCE is sufficient evidence of wrongdoing. Comey verbally “rewrote” the statute in his “press conference” and continued to argue that against Trey Gowdy’s correct reading of the statute in the House hearings.

        Comey was wrong on that, wrong in not making a recommendation for a referral to a grand jury, and wrong for carelessly notifying Congress that 620,000 “new emails had come to light” that the FBI was investigating. Then 8 days later, he absolved Clinton of “any crimes” two days before the election. The FBI admits they didn’t read each of the emails.

        The FBI says they conducted Boolean searches but by no means could their review have been “comprehensive.” Their conclusions are quantitative but not qualitative in context of the email content. Regardless, the fact that any official emails from HRC were found on the Weiner/Abedin computer is a violation of Section 793.

        The process is that the FBI gathers their investigation and either refers or does not refer it to the Justice Department for presentation before a GRAND JURY. The Grand Jury takes testimony, reviews all the facts of the case and then VOTES TO INDICT OR NOT INDICT. If indicted, the case is referred to the Federal District Court where the Grand Jury is sitting.

        The American people were played in all of this. Comey and Obama laid waste to “equal justice under law.” On Election Tuesday the American people decided against allowing this criminal Clinton to take power to RULE over us, and that we might reinstate and reaffirm Constitutional law for all citizens by prosecuting her for her egregious crimes.

        If Trump was given a mandate for anything, it includes prosecuting Hillary Clinton. IF he doesn’t then many people, including me, will withdraw support for Trump. Firing Comey for insisting that there had to be INTENT was the first step. If Trump stops there then he can dangle for 4 years if he can’t keep his promises.

  • Henning Jensen

    Det er et fantastisk billede af tre kvinder der står og griner af os. Og det har de al mulig grund til, for de ved at politikerne bakker dem op.
    Uden det store milliardtilskud til disse feminister, så ville de folkevalgte have sværere ved at udbrede deres løgne, som er grundlaget for nutidens politikeres genvælgelse.

    • Holger Madsen

      I alle tilfælde er det et meget provokerende billede, der giver mig kvalme, lede og raseri. ØV for satan, hvor er vi til grin for disse – disse – disse. Det går nok ikke at skrive, hvad jeg mener.
      LUK det fordømte DR, hellere i går end i dag.
      Jeg har de allernærmeste informationer om, hvordan kulturen i det satans djævleforetagende er. Det er meget værre end jeg anede.

  • Snowflinga

    Om européerna skall överleva så måste de skydda sina länder och sin kultur. Det hjälper inte att politiker använder kvinnor som kallar sig för feminister som egentligen är fördolda kulturmarxister med en agenda att förstöra Europa. Skall Europa förstöras på grund av skuldkänslor och dåligt samvete för vad som hände för 70 år sedan? De européer som lever idag har rätt till sina länder och det gäller även det tyska folket eftersom den nuvarande generationen har ingenting att göra med vad som hände för länge sedan.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m96SLSOia8s

  • Charles Nielsen

    De 3 Damer trænger gevaldig til en ordenlig omgang kulturberigelse.
    De ville nyde det, og det ville jeg også.

    Oh Disse kvinder.