Snaphanens læsere ved, jeg altid har et kompaktkamera i lommen. Jeg er forelsket  i den kameratype, selvom jeg har vistnok 15 andre. Min Leica-Lumix kan alt, næsten, og helt ubemærket. Jeg kan fotografere  mennesker, mens  jeg taler med dem, uden at de  opdager det. Jeg kunne  tage  120 fotos i DR-byen, selvom det var “forbudt”.  “Candid photography” er blevet nemmere end nogensinde.   Det tænker  jeg på hver gang  jeg ser  “pressens gentlemen” , der er alt andet end  blide,  chikanere enhver  begivenhed med deres  kæmpe-kanoner og flash.  Er der  ikke lys nok, op på 1600  ASA, super  vidvinkel. Igår havnede  jeg uforvarent i Nikolai Kirke til deres fine  Paul Gadegaard udstilling. Bassisten Hugo Rasmussen (th), der  har spillet med alt hvad der kan krybe og  gå siden 1961, og er  beskedenheden selv, fortalte  anekdoter.  Mest interesseret var jeg i dem om  Cornelis Vreeswijk og Fred Åkerstrøm, to af mine yndlinge. Jeg skal skåne deres eftermæle, ved ikke at fortællle dem videre. (foto© Snaphanen, klik f. helbillede)

Da Åkerströms vidunderlige “Glimmande Nymf” desværre ikke er er på nettet, her en anden af hans Bellman fortolkninger. Åkerström behøvede ikke at have komplekser over ikke at skrive sange selv. : “Så lunka vi så småningom” . “Synes du, graven er for dyb ………..  ?”

“Forældre  for  fred”

små problemer  med kurs mod store  problemer. Søren Pind har  anvist løsninger  på dette, men ingen hører ham…….endnu. Forældrene skulle vel aldrig  selv have stemt for installationen af dem i 25 år ? Nu sidder de  i al fald med aben, uanset deres appelleren.  Statsmandskunst er at styre uden om undgåelige ulykker, og det er  i al fald for sent. Mindre  politiske tænkere går rundt og har “visioner” inde i Folketinget, og det er desværre det, der er  hele problemet. “Social friktion” hedder det, og det går der allerede  uanede kræfter og penge til spilde med. En plads  på en lukket  institution , koster 2 mio om året + svie og smerte.

 Kære Lene Espersen.

Vi er en flok forældre der er yderst bekymret for vores ellers hyggelige bydel. Vi har været yderst tolererante. Der skal være plads til alle, men vores tålmodighed er opbrugt. Vi har prøvet at tale til de unges fornuft. Vi prøver at have dialog med forældre, intet hjælper. [… Lærerne gør et stort stykke arbejde. Bruger lære ressourcer på at have fast vagt oppe på vores torv. Finde ud af navnene og hvor de hører til. Hvilke bydele kommer de fra. Det er det vores SSP medarbejder jo selvfølglig også gør, men der er brug for flere OG HVOR ER POLITIET. Jeg hører lærerne sige i kor: “Vi venter bare på de bliver 15 år”  Fru Lene Espersen, hvad skal vi stille op?

NED MED DEN KRIMINELLE LAVALDER OG NUL TOLERANCE.

Venlig hilsen på vegne af hele den bekymrede forældreflok i Brønshøj 

Men de største ‘half-wits’ er dog blandt journalister og berøringsangste myndigheder

Det er ‘half-wit’-dag på Snaphanen i dag. Nu skal der ikke pukkes unødigt på hvad der måske, måske vitterligt er en svag person der er blevet udnyttet kynisk og groft. Når de spændinger der opbygges i Europa i disse år kun kan ende i vores gode samfunds endeligt, enten ved vold på en uhørt skala, eller ved kujonagtig opgivelse af vores egen frihed, så er de virkeligt skyldige de blandt vores egne myndigheder, eliter og overnationale organer, som aktivt arbejder som fødselshjælpere for denne kommende omvæltning. Så til de virkelige half-wits hører: EU, som ved hovedløs, sucidal planlægning uden at spørge de berørte befolkninger planlægger en Euro-Mediterranean Union, og ligeledes uden åben debat planlægger totalitær lovgivning (udlevering til andre medlemslande for handlinger der er strafbare der, hate speech-love) – nationale regeringer som den hollandske der vel går forrest i at kaste håndklædet i ringen – vores selvhadende eliter, hvad enten de er socialister, kulturradikale eller liberale – og så selvfølgelig politimyndigheder og journalister som ikke evner, tør eller må gå til ondets rod – den supremacistiske ideologi islam. Denne artikel fra en engelsk avis indeholder alle klicheerne om de chokerede trosfæller og bekendte til den retarderede bombemand fra Exeter. Faktisk må journalisten have sat en rekord i gentagelse af denne fortærskede kliché. Via Jihad Watch:

An Islamic friend of terror suspect Nick Reilly says he is stunned at his suspected bomb plot.

[…] Omar knew him by his adopted name of Mohammed Rasheed and says he is amazed at what he is alleged to have attempted.[…]
Fellow worshippers at the mosque at a former Labour Party office in Plymouth said they were shocked at the arrest.[…]
Neighbours say Reilly had become increasingly extreme in his religion and had images of the Twin Towers attack as the screensaver on his computer.
Devon and Cornwall deputy chief constable Tony Melville named Reilly as the suspected bomber and said:”He has a history of mental illness and had adopted the Islamic faith.
“We believe that despite his vulnerable state he has been preyed upon, radicalized and taken advantage of.”
Omar, who plays cricket for Plymouth University where he is the racial equality officer at the student union, says he cannot believe Reilly was radicalized in the city. […]
“He always struck me as being not quite well in the head but he seemed a nice guy. He was always polite and greeted me nicely.
“I just cannot understand why someone like him would carry weapons. He did seem to be extremely religious after his conversion. […]I believe the Islamic community will be stunned by what he is alleged to have done because he always seemed so calm and nice.
“The people who knew him from prayers will be quite broken by the news. […]
Syed Rahman, aged 64, who is chairman of the other Tamasha in Plymouth used mainly by the Bangladeshi community, said everyone is horrified by the alleged bombing.[…]
I was surprised he was involved in this type of thing.
“I would not have thought it of someone like him. We were shocked to hear it.
“He has become a bit of a recluse recently. The last time I saw him out and about was a couple of months ago.
“He was a loner and people did make fun of him a bit – it seemed as if he had not got a personality and was an introvert.
“When he went out he just wandered around and for the past three or four years he has looked closed off.
[…] He was a harmless guy trying to bond. He always seemed very ‘down’ but he did try to connect with people.
“Possibly he did not have the ability to connect. I think he felt rejected by local people.”

Another neighbour, Aly Turner, aged 17, said Reilly had been brainwashed.
[…]
“He did not talk to many people. He was a bit of a recluse, he did not have many friends locally.
“What he supposed to have done is wrong but if you get brainwashed you get brainwashed. That is what happened to him.” [mine fremhævelser, LFPC] ISLAMIC FRIEND OF REILLY ‘STUNNED’ AT BOMB PLOT

Ethvert normalt nysgerrigt menneske, og derfor også enhver journalist, ville ikke lade sig stille tilfreds med at konstatere hvor “shocked” folk var – man ville prøve at gå mere i dybden, og måske reflektere over hvorfor disse klicheer netop altid dukker op når der er tale om afsløringer eller arrestationer af terrormistænkte fra Fredens Religion. Men nej, når emnet er islam, så er der en klap der går ned, og forløbet styres af en mere eller mindre bevidst drejebog – aldrig, aldrig spørge hvorfor folk der regner sig som meget rettroende kan ‘misforstå’ deres fredelige religion så fælt, aldrig, aldrig spørge hvorfor konvertitter tilsyneladende er særligt slemme til at ‘misforstå’ islams angiveligt fredelige natur, aldrig, aldrig spørge, hvorfor man i dette åh-så-fredelige-og-moderate miljø ikke har fat i de mystiske folk der står for denne ‘radikalisering’.

Bemærk en anden kliché: Brugen af passivform: “he has been preyed upon, radicalized and taken advantage of”. Det skete bare, sådan – den grammatiske form bruges til behændigt at gå uden om spørgsmålet om levende mennesker af kød og blod, der har læst Koranen, hadith og sira, og som opfatter sig som rettroende muslimer, og som koldt og kynisk har brugt en svag person som Reilly.

Den eneste kliché vi har til gode er den med at ‘jeg frygter at dette kan føre til et backlash mod muslimer’. Den står også i drejebogen (LFPC).

Half-Wits In The Service Of Islam

en “arbejdsulykkes” psyko-politiske patologi. Bomben i Exeter igår:

Devon and Cornwall Deputy Chief Constable Tony Melville said Reilly appeared to be a “vulnerable” individual who had been “preyed upon” and “radicalised”.
He said: “Our investigations so far indicate that Reilly, who has a history of mental illness, had adopted the Islamic faith.
“We believe that he was preyed uporadicalised and taken advantage of.”Reilly was arrested by police at the scene of the explosion. He suffered lacerations to his eye and some facial burning after one device exploded. (from a story in The Daily Mail )

Not half-wits in the Garaudy or Galloway or Chomsky sense, each quite capable of low cunning, but half-wits in the literal sense. For Muslim “activists” (fine word, activists–its awfulness reflecting the awfulness of all “activists”) are good at identifying, for the purposes of Da’wa, target populations of the economically and psychically marginal.

The explosive Mr. Reilly of Exeter turns out, unsurprisingly, to be a man with a history of mental illness who was “preyed upon and radicalised” by Muslims.

This description fits perfectly the Dutchman Volkert van der Graaf, a demented man and “animal-rights activist” whose “concern for the most vulnerable members of society” led him — via Muslims who carefully explained to him that next to of course animals it was they, Muslims, who best fit that definition and it was bad old Pim Fortuyn who was out to get them and wouldn’t it be nice, wouldn’t it be right, if some brave protector of the “most vulnerable” were to come to their aid by shooting Pim Fortuyn dead so he wouldn’t any longer be able to threaten those “most vulnerable” and helpless Muslims.

And that is exactly what Volkert van der Graaf did.

There are those who continue to believe that because Volkert van der Graaf was not a declared convert to Islam, and was known as an animal-rights activist, his murder of Pim Fortuyn had nothing to do with Islam. They never seem, these people, to ask themselves two questions. First, what did the murder of Pim Fortuyn have to do with animal rights? Was Pim Fortuyn known for having taken any position on the treatment or mistreatment of animals? No, he was not.

The second question is: why did Volkert van der Graaf, then, murder Pim Fortuyn? What was it about Pim Fortuyn that he, Volkert van der Graaf, told the court was the reason for his murdering him? It is no secret. He made it clear before his trial, and at his trial, and after his trial.

From the Daily Telegraph of March 28, 2003:

“A Left-wing activist confessed in court yesterday to Holland’s first political assassination in 400 years, claiming that he shot Pim Fortuyn to defend Dutch Muslims from persecution. Volkert van der Graaf, 33, a vegan animal rights campaigner, said he alone was responsible for killing the maverick protest leader last May, days before a general election in which the Fortuyn List party vaulted into second place and shattered Holland’s consensus.

Facing a raucous court on the first day of his murder trial, he said his goal was to stop Mr Fortuyn exploiting Muslims as ‘scapegoats’ and targeting ‘the weak parts of society to score points” to try to gain political power. He said: “I confess to the shooting. He was an ever growing danger who would affect many people in society. I saw it as a danger. I hoped that I could solve it myself.'”

Possibly van der Graaf arrived at this conclusion on his own. More likely, I think, is that Muslims used him as a weapon, a human guided missile that they could exploit and direct through the power of mental suggestion.But it doesn’t matter. It was a killing for Muslims, on behalf of Muslims, for a Muslim cause, by a non-Muslim sympathizer, of a man known for his anti-Muslim views.

Surely that is enough to connect it to the case of Mr. Reilly, in Exeter, a half-wit whom more cunning Muslims, demented in a different way, were willing to exploit by putting thoughts into his head – which thoughts led to his little bomb, and little explosion. That explosion hurt, in this case, only him. But there are other half-wits, for Islam preys in the West not only on the economically marginal (who are given a Total System that justifies them in their resentments, and organizes that resentment, often taken out in criminal activity, so that it all makes sense within the framework of Islam, as justified hatred of Infidels, and criminal behavior re-interpreted, so that stealing from Infidels becomes justified as proleptic Jizyah, and rape of Infidel women – see those imams in Norway, explaining this so solemnly – is deserved, because of the way they dress, which means, of course, that they are, civilizationally, asking for it.

No, in this case there was what the Israelis drily call a “work accident.” But what about next time, with the next half-wit? Hugh Fitzgerald

New English Review

Mentally ill man ‘brainwashed’ into suicide bomb bid, police say

‘Half-wits’ i Ny Alliances tjeneste

Jørgen, med den blævrende mund og de gode, gode øjne, altid på vagt for de svage og udsatte. Jørgen kan – ud over en velspækket bankkonto – også bryste sig af fine, hvide hænder, for ingen vil tillægge ham uanstændige tanker, når bare man som ham målretter godheden specifikt mod godhedsindustriens klienter.

Med andre ord: Har man nogensinde set Jørgen Poulsen, Ridderen af Den Rene Hånd, udstrække sin omsorg til kvinder, også kristne, i Basra som bliver truet på livet – hvis ikke lemlæstet og dræbt – hvis de ikke indpakker sig? Til kvinder i muslimske lande som bliver skamferet med syre for alskens overtrædelser? Til kvinder og piger som Amina og Sarah, dræbt af deres far for at blive for vestlige? Til hjemlige ofre for groteske ‘æres’begreber som ikke hører hjemme i vores land, som Sonay eller Ghazala Khan?

Og hvis Sct. Jørgen har, har han så ikke evnet eller villet prøve at se fremtidsperspektiverne som accept af indpakning fører med sig? Hvorfor mon Atatürk forbød indpakning af offentligt ansatte tyrkiske kvinder?

Men det er efterhånden velkendt, at shaming med nazikortet af Dansk Folkeparti er vigtigere for levebrødssamaritanere som Jørgen Poulsen, end syre i ansigtet eller familiedrab er (LFPC).

Ny Alliances Jørgen Poulsen retter en ny, sønderlemmende [man må gyse, LFPC] kritik af Dansk Folkeparti og sammenligner partiets burka-annoncer med nazistisk propaganda.[…]

“Senest har vi fået et – efter eget udsagn – på lange stræk anti-muslimsk parti. Et parti, som ikke viger tilbage for at udslynge nedværdigende bemærkninger om menneskers nationalitet, etniske tilhørsforhold eller dyrke hadet mod religiøse grupper med metoder, som godt kan sammenlignes med de metoder, som blev anvendt mod jøderne i tredivernes Tyskland,” sagde Poulsen og fortsatte:[…]

“Vi oplever her i vores eget land et parti, der som led i en partipolitisk propaganda indrykker annoncer i danske aviser med danske dommere iklædt burka og med hammer i hånden. Vi oplever også en presse, som skulle forestille at være demokratiets vogtere, falde i næsegrus beundring over håndværket bag propagandanummeret. Det ligner uhyggeligt den beundring for håndværket bag ‘Der ewige Jude’ og andre af Goebbels og Riehfenstahls filmiske værker,” sagde Jørgen Poulsen.[…] Poulsen: Nazi-metoder i DF

De Radikale, et parti af lutter ‘half-wits’

NAs Naser Khader har da i det mindste sagt ganske skarpe og fornuftige ting i tidens løb. Jamen, hvad skulle de dog gøre uden Dansk Folkeparti, plejer jeg vist at spørge. Dansk Folkeparti, ondskabens ikon, så uundværlig som et kultisk redskab man kan profilere egen godhed på; ja, faktisk så vigtig en funktion, at retslig uafhængighed og grov vold mod og drab på kvinder med udspring i islams kvindesyn må ignoreres, hvis man ved sin førte politik har sammenfaldende synspunkter med dette parti af usofistikerede vederstyggeligheder. Hvis Ammitzbøll tillægger sin dissens nogen betydning bør han overveje, om energien er værd at bruge i dette parti (LFPC).

“Jeg er imod politiske og religiøse symboler hos dommere og for den sags skyld hos anklagere – der går jeg længere end regeringen,” siger Simon Ammitzbøll.

Han har meddelt sin folketingsgruppe om sin stilling i sagen. Derfor ønsker han ikke at være retsordfører på det retspolitiske forslag, som formand Margrethe Vestager har kaldt et “knæfald for DF”. Tørklædeforbud splitter radikale