6
nov
Seneste opdatering: 6/11-13 kl. 1318
19 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

by Fjordman

fjordmanWhen discussing the negative consequences of mass immigration, critics sometimes claim that the pro-Multicultural media elites will only want to restrict mass immigration after they themselves have personally felt the negative effects of the policies they support. This is true in some instances, but not always. A recent case form Norway illustrates this.

Under the heading “Robbery wave as deserved,” the left-wing national daily Dagbladet in Norway ran an essay on November 1, 2013 by the writers Arild Opheim and Elin Ruhlin Gjuvsland. They have both worked as profiled journalists for the state broadcaster NRK, Norway’s equivalent of the BBC.

It is an old saying that “A conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged.” Yet here we are dealing with two open-border Multiculturalists who were mugged in a very brutal manner. They reacted to this by becoming even more devout open-border Multiculturalists. The couple were assaulted in their own private home in Oslo in late 2011. The two hooded intruders spoke broken English, mixed with some Arabic and Spanish words. They said, “Don’t look. Sleep. If look, we kill.”

The couple were tied up in their bed in the middle of the night and robbed of their valuables. One of the young foreign criminals was later caught. He turned out to be an 18-year-old North African from Algeria who had lived in Spain for some years. The female victim, Elin Ruhlin Gjuvsland, is relieved that she did not become a racist because of this traumatic ordeal.

It turned out that the two young criminal men were asylum seekers who had recently had their applications for residency rejected. The conclusion drawn by the victims Arild Opheim and Elin Ruhlin Gjuvsland was that they and other Norwegians deserve to be violently attacked because of the country’s allegedly restrictive immigration policies. (In reality, the white natives could be a minority in their own country by the middle of this century. The capital city Oslo already contains more ethnic groups than there are member states of the United Nations).

These journalists did not refer to illegal immigrants even as “paperless immigrants” but as “dreamers”: nice people who simply dream of a better life in Europe but are being unfairly denied this. They used the term “as deserved” (som fortjent) explicitly in this newspaper essay about violent attacks against the natives. Does this imply that a 90-year-old Norwegian woman who is assaulted and robbed by foreigners in the country where her ancestors have lived since prehistoric times somehow “deserves” this? According to this essay, the white majority population apparently “deserve” to be assaulted and robbed.

The above-mentioned article did not stipulate any age limit. It seemed to indicate that 9-year-old girls or 90-year-old women deserve to be physically assaulted by immigrants solely because they are white and their country has not yet accepted unlimited mass immigration for billions of people. Not only did these two journalists from the state broadcaster say this; the newspaper Dagbladet saw fit to publish this claim.

This particular essay was so extreme even by Scandinavian standards that it quickly gathered hundreds of readers’ comments on the Internet. All of them without exception were soon removed because the paper found them “offensive.” So this newspaper could publish an essay stating in plain words that Norwegians in general deserve to be attacked because of their country’s allegedly restrictive immigration policies, yet they could not allow the reactions of readers who found it insulting that their mother, sister or son deserved to be assaulted. Fortunately, the dissident writer Christian Skaug and others at the alternative website Document.no managed to capture a copy of many of these readers’ comments before Dagbladet deleted them.

I had an email discussion with Cornelia Kristiansen, who is responsible for the debate section at Dagbladet, in December 2012. I wanted to publish a reply to one of their negative articles about me. I agreed to make some changes to the text, but I stood my ground when it came to referring to a recent case in the Netherlands as anti-white racist violence. Just a few days earlier, a white native Dutch linesman, Richard Nieuwenhuizen, had been kicked and beaten to death on the football field in Almere in front of his son. The fact that the perpetrators were non-European immigrants was systematically downplayed by most Western mass media. This was a case of North African Muslims killing a native European man.

In June 2013, six teenagers and a 51-year-old man were jailed for their role in Nieuwenhuizen’s death. I have noticed that reporting on “racism in football” has become a major priority in recent years. What is meant by that seems to be any kind of gesture or word that any non-European might potentially deem offensive. Yet here we have a case where a European man was beaten to death in Europe by non-Europeans. For some reason, this is not referred to as “racism in football.”

The left-wing newspaper Dagbladet refused to publish my suggestion that this could be seen as anti-white racism. The reason for the paper’s decision was apparently that doing so would violate their anti-racist policies. So what can they publish?

To put things in perspective, consider the so-called paramedics incident in Oslo in 2007. In Oslo, one black man from Ghana had beaten another black man from Somalia. The Somalian man urinated on the ambulance drivers who showed up at the scene, after which they left. It later turned out that the Somalian man had suffered more serious head injuries than the two paramedics initially suspected. Because of this, most of the mass media and left-wing political establishment, including ministers from the left-wing coalition government of PM Jens Stoltenberg, turned this incident into a nasty case of supposed “white racism.”

In Norway, a country straddling the Arctic Circle, one African man beat another African man. The media reacted to this by ruthlessly going after the white ambulance drivers who came to help. The public harassment of them was so serious that it brought the two men almost to the brink of suicide. These baseless accusations of “racism” were repeated by Dagbladet’s political editor Marie Simonsen, among others. One of the two ambulance drivers, Erik Schjenken, later sued the newspaper Dagbladet for making false accusations. Schjenken won this legal case in court, twice.

What the left-wing pro-Multicultural newspaper Dagbladet has demonstrated is that it is OK for them to publish baseless accusations against specific (white) individuals in the name of anti-racism, diversity and “tolerance”. It is also OK to publish essays indicating that ALL whites deserve to be physically assaulted if they refuse to totally abandon national borders. On the other hand, they cannot even publish the claim that non-Europeans beating a European to death might have something to do with racism.

The people implementing these policies are the very same people who claim that there is no media bias and that any talk of media censorship is a “myth.”

Publiceret sammen med Gates of Vienna

Update from Fjordman:

PS: The authors of this essay had extremely bad timing. Just a couple of days later, on November 4, 2013, three people were stabbed to death on an express bus in western Norway. The killer was a failed African asylum seeker who was to be deported the next day.

Bruce Bawer skriver om samme i dag pÄ Frontpage: Victimized by Muslims? You Deserve It

0 0 vote
Article Rating


DonĂ©r engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

19 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
T. Snorrason
T. Snorrason
7 years ago

Ikke sĂ„ megen snak og hĂŠndervriden. Rusland viser vejen. Som tidligere nĂŠvnt, har russerne kendt og hĂ„ndteret islamproblemet i Ă„rhundreder. Betragt islamiske jihadister som gemene forbrydere og behandl problemet derefter. Bedst ville selvfĂžlgelig vĂŠre, om man snart indser, at islam ikke er en religion, men en politisk orienteret forbryderkult, hvor en person, som ethvert retssamfund kun kan betragte som voldsforbryder og drabsmand, dyrkes som “den fuldkomne mand” og til efterligning. From Jihad Watch – http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/11/putin-signs-law-requiring-terrorists-relatives-to-pay-for-damages.html Putin signs law requiring terrorists’ relatives to pay for damages This law indicates that Putin is intent on cracking down on jihad terrorists and eradicating… Read more »

Bjovulf
Bjovulf
7 years ago

En mere 😀 😀 😀

Der er planer om en universitetsuddannelse for imamer i DK …

http://www.sappho.dk/uploads/images/Gallery/tegninger-2013/301013.jpg

Kim Rasmussen
Kim Rasmussen
7 years ago
Reply to  Bjovulf

Hehehe….:-):-):-)

Bjovulf
Bjovulf
7 years ago

Dagens griner 😀

Den snakkende klase har kastet sin kĂŠrlighed pĂ„ indvandrerghettoernes eksotiske sprogkultur …
http://www.sappho.dk/uploads/images/Gallery/tegninger-2013/061113.jpg

Peter Buch
Peter Buch
7 years ago

Et er vel perspektiver pÄ berettigelse eller ej af angreb, noget andet hvad der umiddelbart og senere kan gÞres for formindskelse eller forhindring af sÄdanne angreb.
Overlevelse, potentiel overlevelse kunne vel vÊre det vÊsentligste bÄde individ som samfund sÞgte fremmet, set herfra.

Bergfast
7 years ago

Denna artikel av Fjordman pĂ„minner om vad journalisten Frida Boisen skrev om Sverige i Expressen för en tid sedan. Hon skrev: ”Sverige Ă€r ett rasistiskt land”. http://www.expressen.se/gt/kronikorer/frida-boisen/frida-boisen-sverige-ar-ett-rasistiskt-land/ DĂ€r försöker beskylla hela det svenska samhĂ€llet, och underförstĂ„tt dĂ„ alla svenskar, för att vara strukturella rasister och frĂ€mlingsfientliga, dĂ€rför att de kan se skillnad pĂ„ mĂ€nniskors hudfĂ€rg?…. Precis som om inte ABSOLUT ALLA MÄNNISKOR kan se dessa skillnader mellan olika folkslag? Det minsta barn kan se dessa skillnader och ABSOLUT ALLA MÄNNISKOR pĂ„verkas och identifierar sig sjĂ€lva med mĂ€nniskor som LIKNAR DEM SJÄLVA pĂ„ en mĂ€ngd olika omrĂ„den, alltsĂ„ BÅDE politiska omrĂ„den,… Read more »

Bergfast
7 years ago
Reply to  steen

Tack för intressanta lÀnkar. SÀrskilt den sista. Mycket belysande.

ny kommentator
ny kommentator
7 years ago
Reply to  steen

Teorien om “strukturel rascisme” fik yderligere et nyk op af… De PK amerikanerne gjorde den skuffende opdagelse at afroamerikanere ikke klarede sig bedre… Selv med positiv forfordeling.. SĂ„ opfandt man: White privilege (or white skin privilege): “…refers to the set of societal privileges that white people are argued to benefit from beyond those commonly experienced by people of color in the same social, political, or economic spaces (nation, community, workplace, income, etc.).[note 1] The term denotes both obvious and less obvious unspoken advantages that white individuals may not recognize they have, which distinguishes it from overt bias or prejudice….” DEN… Read more »

SkÄning
SkÄning
7 years ago
Reply to  Bergfast

Ja, jo, Bergfast. Din etnopluralistiska stĂ„ndpunkt Ă€r genomlysande. Du vill inte ha nĂ„gra andra etniska grupper hĂ€r hos oss, pga nĂ„gon sorts grumligt vĂ€rderande av de invandrades bevarande av sin kultur. “Det Ă€r inte enbart det svenska sprĂ„ket och det svenska folket som riskerar att försvinna med en alltför stor invandring. OcksĂ„ de invandrades egna sprĂ„k, egna etniska profiler, egna traditioner, kulturer, berĂ€ttelser och sĂ€rskiljande identifieringar och identiteter riskerar att förloras för dem? De invandrade riskerar alla att förlora kontakten med sina förfĂ€der och sina fars- och mors- generationer bakĂ„t. De riskerar att ocksĂ„ förlora sina identiteter och sin historik.… Read more »

Bergfast
7 years ago
Reply to  SkĂ„ning

Ledsen för krĂ„ngel… … SkĂ„ning sĂ€ger, bl.a., följande:
.” Ja, jo, Bergfast. Din etnopluralistiska stĂ„ndpunkt Ă€r genomlysande. Du vill inte ha nĂ„gra andra etniska grupper hĂ€r hos oss, pga nĂ„gon sorts grumligt vĂ€rderande av de invandrades bevarande av sin kultur”
 Detta sĂ€ger jag alltsĂ„ INTE. Jag föresprĂ„kar inte nĂ„gon som helst form av – etnisk rensning – , nĂ„gonstans, och har ingenting emot att ocksĂ„ Sverige till viss del har inslag av folk frĂ„n mycket frĂ€mmande nationer och etniska profiler. Men, som det brukar heta, sĂ„ Ă€r lagom bĂ€st, för just alla medborgare, ur flera olika aspekter. Om övriga nordeuropĂ©er, eller… Read more »

Bergfast
7 years ago
Reply to  Bergfast

Ps. HĂ€r Ă€r mitt – korrekta – , dvs. – mitt hela – , kanske för lĂ„nga (?), men Ă€ndĂ„ det svar som jag skrev till SkĂ„ning… Ledsen för krĂ„ngel… … SkĂ„ning sĂ€ger, bl.a., följande:
.” Ja, jo, Bergfast. Din etnopluralistiska stĂ„ndpunkt Ă€r genomlysande. Du vill inte ha nĂ„gra andra etniska grupper hĂ€r hos oss, pga nĂ„gon sorts grumligt vĂ€rderande av de invandrades bevarande av sin kultur”
 Detta sĂ€ger jag alltsĂ„ INTE. Jag föresprĂ„kar inte nĂ„gon som helst form av – etnisk rensning – , nĂ„gonstans, och har ingenting emot att ocksĂ„ Sverige till viss del har inslag av folk frĂ„n… Read more »

Bergfast
7 years ago
Reply to  Bergfast

Pps. Eftersom den sista kommentaren till SkĂ„ning i stort sett Ă€r densamma som den före, den ovanstĂ„ende, (dvs. föregĂ„ende, Posted: 7 November 2013 – 10:32 ), sĂ„ skulle den föregĂ„ende med fördel kunna tas bort. Tacksam pĂ„ förhand. Korrigering av sista meningarna i min (sista korrekta) kommentar: ….”Om alla mĂ€nniskor och nationer till slut skall bli som – amerikaner – sĂ„ skulle det troligtvis i förlĂ€ngningen bli en trĂ„kigare och mindre mĂ„ngfaldig vĂ€rld? Amerikaner, som ibland kan upplevas vara ganska sĂ„ högljudda, ja, nĂ€stan gapiga, (?), och ocksĂ„ till viss del som tillgjorda, dĂ€r mĂ„nga Ă€r skönhetsopererade i den allmĂ€nna… Read more »

Britta Due Andersen
Britta Due Andersen
7 years ago

I fÞlge Anders BB fik de unge socialdemokrater pÄ UtÞja nok ogsÄ, hvad de fortjente, for at forblive i den tankegang!

Maria Magdalena
Maria Magdalena
7 years ago

SjĂ€lvförakt har bland vĂ€nsterfolket har blivit en ny religion – en sekt lika hysterisk som hĂ€xprocesserna pĂ„ 1600-talet.
Likt inkvisitionens prÀster vÀltrar de sej i sjÀlvförakt, och att piskande sej sjÀlv blodig Àr nödvÀndigt för att tvinga ut ondskan som mÄste finnas dÀrinne.

Vi Àr dÀr igen.

Varmt Konservativ (kr) / Stay Ahead
Varmt Konservativ (kr) / Stay Ahead
7 years ago

Det handlar nog inte i första hand om sjĂ€lvförakt. Jag tror att de egentligen exkluderar sig sjĂ€lva nĂ€r de talar om “vita, kristna, heterosexuella…” och sĂ„ vidare. De uppfattar sig som en helt egen grupp vid sidan av – eller snarare högt ovanför – alla andra. De Ă€r avantgardet, förkĂ€mparna i kampen för “den nya mĂ€nniskan” helt enkelt, precis som pĂ„ 1910-20-talen. VĂ€ldigt lite har förĂ€ndrat sig sedan dess i deras tankevĂ€rld, Ă„tminstone vad mĂ„let betrĂ€ffar: det totala förintandet av vad de kallar “borgarklassen”, sĂ€rskilt den vĂ€sterlĂ€ndska. Det har legat och pyrt under ytan och har tidvis skymts av andra… Read more »

Anne Marie Buch
Anne Marie Buch
7 years ago

Men det er jo sandt. Befolkningerne i Europa HAR jo fortjent hvad de faar. De har i aartier stemt paa politikere der har tilladt denne indvandring. De har derfor faaet denne indvandring. Det er sgu da guddommelig refaerdighed.