6
maj
Seneste opdatering: 7/5-14 kl. 0543
29 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!
(© 2014 Fjordman, Gates of Vienna & Snaphanen.dk)

In early 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm School of Economics, published a book about the impact mass immigration is having on Sweden. He estimated the costs of immigration to be around 250 billion Swedish kroner annually, roughly 7% of Sweden’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for 2013.

This is substantially higher than earlier estimates presented by professor Bo Södersten in 2003 of 40-50 billion kroner annually, and professor Jan Ekberg in 2009 of 45-60 billion kroner annually. The number of immigrants and their descendants keeps rising fast every year. However, Tullberg added certain indirect costs that were largely excluded from previous studies, such as increased crime and special education needs for immigrants.

Rapes vs. immigration rates in Sweden, 1980-2008. ¬†Residence permits granted during the year ‚ÄĒ The number of reported rapes in the years 1980-2008 (Source Migration Board, BR√Ö) Granted residence during the year ‚ÄĒ (red) Number of reported rapes during the year¬†Original article (Swedish). Grafik Affes Statistik-blogg

I cannot vouch for the accuracy of this number suggested by Jan Tullberg. However, if you divide 250 billion kroner by 9.7 million people, it amounts to nearly 26 thousand kroner per inhabitant per year. That’s nearly an average monthly wage in Sweden, before tax.

Yet this sum includes every single person living in Sweden, from babies to recent immigrants. The sum becomes even higher if you divide it by the number productive native citizens. If this is correct, it means that every native Swede starts his year by dedicating all of January to pay for a mass immigration that could render him a minority in his own country in a few decades. Only in February does he start earning money for himself. And these costs keep going up.

Predictably, Jan Tullberg‚Äôs book and its explosive content were met largely with silence from the established media, even though 2014 is a year of national elections in Sweden. This was also the case in 2013 when the ethnologist Karl-Olov Arnsberg and the journalist Gunnar Sandelin published their book Invandring och m√∂rkl√§ggning (‚ÄúImmigration and Cover-up‚ÄĚ), where they described sensitive facts about immigration. As the writer Elin √ėrjas√¶ter noted in Norway, the book by Arnsberg and Sandelin has sold thousands of copies, despite having met a near-total blackout from the heavily censored Swedish mainstream media.

The May 2013 riots in certain immigrant-dominated suburbs of Stockholm and other Swedish cities raised eyebrows abroad. While I found them disturbing, I cannot say that I was totally surprised by them. I had consistently warned about such a likely outcome under this pen name for nearly a decade.

A year later, there are still fears that similar riots could return at any moment. The underlying problems have not been resolved, and immigration continues at full speed. Other Swedish cities such as Gothenburg (Göteborg) and Malmö have been plagued by public gang shootings and the rise of foreign mafias on a scale that would have been unthinkable in Scandinavia just a few short years ago.

Some of this growing instability is threatening to spill across the border. Sweden’s diversity problems are gradually becoming a security threat to neighboring countries. There have been several documented cases where people from an immigrant background have traveled from Sweden to Norway to carry out crime there.

In 2012, a court found four Muslim men guilty of terrorism for planning an assault on the offices of the newspaper Jyllands-Posten in Copenhagen, Denmark. They were the Swedish citizens Munir Awad, Omar Abdalla Aboelazm and Sahbi Ben Mohamed Zalouti, plus one Tunisian national. These men were arrested in December 2010. Jyllands-Posten has been the intended target of several Islamic-inspired terror attacks since it published some rather innocent cartoons of Islam’s founder Mohammed in September 2005.

This particular plot to ‚Äúkill as many people as possible‚ÄĚ was uncovered and prevented through competent work by the security intelligence agency PET in Denmark together with its Swedish counterpart S√§po. However, there will probably be more such Islamic terror attempts in the future, and it is questionable whether the security services will be able to prevent all of them.

The business daily Finansavisen in Norway has concluded that immigration to Norway cost 210 billion Norwegian kroner under PM Jens Stoltenberg’s left-wing coalition government, between 2005 and 2013. This estimate may well be too low. I a series of carefully researched articles published in 2013,Finansavisen came to the conclusion that the non-Western immigrants who came to Norway in 2012 alone will cost the country 63 billion kroner, when all is said and done. On average, every single non-Western immigrant will cost native tax payers 4.1 million Norwegian kroner, with Somalis topping the list as the most costly nationality.

The only immigrants that were a net gain to the economy came from other Western countries, especially Western Europe and North America. Norway has for instance seen an influx of young Swedish nurses. These are culturally speaking closely-related peoples. It is far more difficult to assimilate Pakistanis, Kurds or Arabs.

The claim that non-Western immigration is beneficial to the economy is just plain wrong. Some big companies may gain short-term benefits from access to cheap labor, and left-wing political parties can import voters from Third World countries, who overwhelmingly tend to vote for left-wing parties. Yet for society as a whole in the long term, non-Western immigration is a net drain, not a net gain. Muslim immigration is a particular liability because it brings with it a whole set of additional problems not usually seen among Chinese or Thai immigrants.

These highly revealing numbers about the huge costs of mass immigration were barely talked about during the national election campaign in Norway in 2013. They were largely met with silence, usually by the very same journalists who claim that is no bias or censorship on subjects related to immigration. The reporters for the state broadcaster NRK were among the worst.

The costs are presumably higher in Sweden than in Norway since Sweden has accepted more non-Western immigrants that any other Nordic country. Moreover, unlike Norway, Sweden does not have substantial wealth derived from oil and natural gas. The large and growing costs related to mass immigration have already become a significant burden on society. The famous Swedish welfare state is no longer what it once was.

A study from 2014 revealed that eight of ten Swedes now believe they won’t get a pension that will cover their living expenses after retiring. At the same time, numbers from early 2014 indicated that Sweden is in the middle of its largest population increase in generations. Most of this is due to immigration from countries such as Somalia and Syria.

Native Swedes are running out of money, partly because this have to fund their own colonization. They will be a minority in their own country in a few decades, if present trends continue, and they are paying lots of money to finance this population replacement. The same could be said about other European countries, from The Netherland or Germany to Britain.

The costs of mass immigration take different forms, direct and indirect. Those that are simplest to measure in monetary terms are social benefits and welfare payments. These have been demonstrated time and again in different studies from different Western countries to be very substantial.

A decline in social trust is another effect. This is harder to measure, but likely to be significant. The Scandinavian and Nordic countries owe parts of their wealth to high levels of social capital, for instance high levels of trust and low levels of corruption. This is a cultural achievement supported by a largely homogeneous populace with shared values. This great reservoir of social capital is now being willfully and systematically squandered by current immigration policies. By rendering the population less homogeneous and mass importing people from more cynical and repressive clannish cultures, you lower levels of trust and increase corruption.

Another type of cost is the rise of organized and violent crime. Many people now feel less safe in the streets, which is a serious negative consequence of open borders policies.

Last, but not least, comes the highest price of all: The loss of homeland. While spending billions needlessly on social benefits for foreigners may be annoying, you cannot put a price tag on being displaced in your own country by other nations and seeing your cultural heritage being disparaged and dismantled.

These negative effects are now being felt by the natives from Greece to Ireland and from Finland to France.

Former US President Dwight D. Eisenhower made a famous speech in 1961 where he warned against the military-industrial complex.

If you put together all those who are today engaged in feeding, sheltering and settling asylum seekers and other newcomers, we are dealing with a sizable industry of people, from interpreters to lawyers. Perhaps we can call this the asylum-industrial complex or the immigration-industrial complex. Huge resources are spent on keeping up an ideology and an immigration policy that could ultimately render the native population a minority in their own country. This is currently taking place not just in one country, but in dozens of countries across an entire continent: Europe.

It will be left to future historians to determine how such a massive and dangerous social experiment on hundreds of millions of people could be presented as something good and inevitable, and how the gradual destruction of the most creative civilization in human history could be lauded as a positive achievement.

Se ogs√• for nylig: Sweden‚Äôs Totalitarian Face, Fjordman: Churchill, Hitler and Islam¬†eller tilbage til maj 2013:¬†Bogen om Fjordman ‚Äď introduktion til ukendt land

0 0 vote
Article Rating


Don√©r engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

29 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] sig i omegnen af 80-100 milliarder kroner om √•ret, hvilet rimer meget godt med det svenske tal 250 milliarder (2014). Pernille Vermund har alts√• ret, og den konservative Kause Kj√¶rs optr√¶den i¬†programmet […]

trackback

[…] svenske politikere bilder folket ind indvandringen er, at bel√łbe sig til 250 milliarder eller 7 % af […]

trackback

[…] er dyr. Helt n√łjagtigt 250 mia kroner om √•ret eller 7 procent af […]

trackback

[…] skal bem√¶rkes at professor Ekbergs tal for indvandringens omkostninger er ti √•r gamle. √ėkonomen Jan Tulberg regnede dem sidste √•r ud til 7 procent af BNP eller ufattelige 250 milliarder sv.kr. Hele udsendelsen:¬†Studio […]

trackback

[…] over stok og sten, bla med vi og Sverige er blevet rigere af indvandringen. N√•r den koster Sverige 250 mia om √•ret, er det en s√¶rlig Trads’k rigdom, selv Reinfeldt m√•tte indr√łmme ikke fandtes. […]

trackback

[…] Det ville ogs√• v√¶re synd, hvis man glemte den lille klike, der er ansvarlige for ufattelige milliardudgifter, hundrevis af d√łde svenske og hundredetusindvis af voldsofre.¬†Det ville ikke v√¶re […]

trackback

[…] √ėkonomen, docent Jan Tullberg skrev bogen L√•sningen om indvandringes √łkonomi. Endnu en bog der m√•tte spredes gennem alternative medier. Tullbergs kritik af svenske medier er ikke n√•dig, han beskylder dem direkte for censur og propaganda. Man kan l√¶se mere om bogen her Sweden and the Cost of Mass Immigration. […]

trackback

[…] ikke s√• f√• tusinde har forladt landet. Nogen burde have ansvaret, skulle man mene, ogs√• for 250 milliarder kroners √•rlig udgift, skulle man […]

trackback

[…] forsvaret 45.4 mia kroner. Dette er indvandreres ekstrabelastning af skole, rets og sundhedsv√¶sen. √ėkonomen Jan Tulberg sk√łnnede i √•r den samlede udgift for Sverige er ¬†astronomiske 270 milliarder kroner. Statsbudgetens […]

trackback

[…] de skulle bruge 2 %. Hvis Jan Tullberg har ret, bruger Sverige 14 gange mere p√• multikulturen, nemlig 7 % af BNP.¬† Hvordan Gudrun Schymans FI b√¶re sig ad med at afskaffe et milit√¶r, der n√¶sten allerede er […]

trackback

[…] i ro og politisk passivitet, samtidigt med at den har opmuntret venstreekstremisterne og hevet milliarder ud af dem for at bortgive landet. Undervurd√©r ikke en svensk, statsbetalt journalists fejghed, l√łgnagtighed […]

HH
HH
6 years ago

Stort tack rksmrgs! Min fad√§s kostar mig en urs√§kt till hr Reinfeldt. Han och du har b√§ttre minne √§n jag! Ett lappkast till. Av en dansk v√§n har jag f√•tt ett stort antal av Fogtdals Danmarkshistorie “Illustreret Tidende” en helt makal√∂s i bild och text om Danmarks historia som kanske inte √§r s√• v√§l k√§nd hos oss svenskar. De stora dragen kan vi ju, men allt det andra… H√§r f√•r jag t ex en intressant sak om min h√∂gt v√∂rdade Kierkegaard och hans Regine. Och en bild p√• den sistn√§mnda. Vacker kvinna. Sedan ett nummer om Johanne Luise Heiberg och… Read more »

mb
mb
6 years ago

Islamister indtager dansk fodboldklub

http://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/article2274420.ece?utm_source=tiny&utm_campaign=tiny

Hizb ut-Tahrir-medlemmer har taget magten i Br√łndbys √¶ldste fodboldklub: Ekspert advarer mod, at organisationen har direkte adgang til unge mennesker.

HH
HH
6 years ago

En hastig saltomortal. I svensk radio P1 har man nu p√• onsdagsmorgonen riksdagsdebatt. Det som sl√•r mig mest √§r br√∂sttonerna fr√•n hr Reinfeldt och det mycket genomskinliga undanglidandet. Om jag inte var f√∂r s√∂mnig i b√∂rjan d√§r hr Reinfeldt uttalade sig om krig och fred s√• satte jag mig √§nd√• k√§pprakt upp i s√§ngen. Hr Reinfeldt p√•st√•r att det sista land vi haft krig med skulle vara – Norge! Om jag missat ordet grannland i sammanhanget ber jag hr statsministern om urs√§kt. Men annars m√•ste denne mans historiska kunskaper vara skrala – eller ocks√• √§r han skr√§md av Putin. Det… Read more »

rksmrgs
rksmrgs
6 years ago
Reply to  HH

Nja. Ratan var den sista krigshandling Sverige var inblandad i på svensk mark. Men 1814 drog den svenska armén under ledning av kronprinsen Jean Baptiste Bernadotte ut i krig mot Norge, där norrmännen slutligen besegrades den 14 augusti 1814 strax utanför Kristiania.

Bjovulf
Bjovulf
6 years ago

En rimeligt fair anmeldelse af Akkaris bog i en svensk avis – s√• har man set det med ūüėČ Ett avsked till islamismen Ledare Ivar Arpi 3 maj 2014 kl 01:26, uppdaterad: 4 maj 2014 kl 23:58 G√§stledare Det har g√•tt √•tta √•r sedan Mohammedkarikatyrerna. I dagarna utkom Ahmed Akkari, en av de drivande personerna bakom krisen, med boken ‚ÄĚMin afsked med islamismen‚ÄĚ. Akkari var 2005 en av de islamister som agiterade mot Jyllands-Posten. Denna bok √§r hans avb√∂n och har f√•tt stor uppm√§rksamhet i Danmark och Norge. Efter att karikatyrerna publicerades i Jyllands-Posten den 30 september 2005 dr√∂jde det… Read more »

Bjovulf
Bjovulf
6 years ago
Reply to  Bjovulf

Islamkritik lockar invandrargrupper till Sverigedemokraterna http://www.svd.se/kultur/islamkritik-lockar-invandrare-till-sd_3499946.svd … Paula Bieler konstaterar n√∂jt att SD b√∂rjar bli mer accepterat. Hon √§r glad att public service inte l√§ngre talar om ‚ÄĚfr√§mlingsfientliga‚ÄĚ Sverigedemokraterna. Hon talar om vikten av att man som invandrare blir svensk, men utan att riktigt definiera vad svenskhet √§r. ‚Äď Jag tror p√• assimilation och p√• nationalstaten. M√§nniskor som kommer till Sverige ska k√§nna till den svenska kulturen och bli en del av v√•rt samh√§lle. [!!!] √Ąr d√• ens Paula Bieler sj√§lv tillr√§ckligt svensk? Hennes f√∂r√§ldrar kommer fr√•n Polen. Farmor var en lokal ‚ÄĚkommunistpamp‚ÄĚ. Pappa √§r jude och flydde till Sverige… Read more »

Marit
Marit
6 years ago

Takk for en strålende artikkel, Fjordman ! Heia Ålesund !

Arvid Falk
Arvid Falk
6 years ago
Reply to  steen
Robert R
Robert R
6 years ago

Det er uhyggeligt at se et land stille og roligt begå selvmord, måske ikke kun et land men et helt kontinent.
Skulle et land fors√łge at holde sig uden for denne folkevandring, s√• vil det efterh√•nden blive sv√¶rere og sv√¶rere at holde stand, n√•r nu nabolandene efterh√•nden bliver mere og mere multietniske.

Bergfast
6 years ago

Tycker att Fjordman skriver lite som √•t n√•got slags thrillerskapande h√•ll, eller som n√•gon form av sp√§nningsskapande, med en slags fiendebeskrivning, som fr√§mst verkar vilja rikta sig mot alla farliga invandrare, och fr√§mst och f√∂rst d√• kanske mot islam. Men de som nog egentligen √§r de farligaste m√§nniskorna f√∂r befolkningarna i de skandinaviska nationalstaterna och i √∂vriga nordeuropeiska nationalstater, det √§r nog √§nd√• fr√§mst deras egna politiker och journalister? Dessa som tillsammans med ett internationaliserat, multinationellt och globaliserat n√§ringsliv, samt bankindustri och massmedieindustri, livsmedelsindustri, musikindustri osv., vill trycka p√• och f√∂respr√•ka eller propagera f√∂r en √∂verdriven invandrings- och folkblandningspolitik? Det… Read more »

T. Snorrason
T. Snorrason
6 years ago
Reply to  Bergfast

Hvad der undrer mig mere er, hvor er den svenske (og ogs√• √łvrige europ√¶iske fagbev√¶gelser) fagbev√¶gelse i dette politiske spil?
Det er f√łrst og fremmest deres medlemmers tilv√¶relse og beboelsesomr√•der, der √łdel√¶gges ved den massive import af mellem√łstlige og afrikanske “flygtninge”.
Omkostningerne √łdel√¶gger ethvert tidligere socialt gode, man har opn√•et gennem tiderne, skoler, sygehuse osv. Overalt m√• der sk√¶res ned for at betale for vanviddet, og det er den almindelige borger og arbejder, der betaler via skatten.
Hvorfor kæmper fagbevægelserne ikke længere for deres medlemmers interesser?

Bergfast
6 years ago
Reply to  T. Snorrason

T. Snorrason:…”Hvorfor k√¶mper fagbev√¶gelserne ikke l√¶ngere for deres medlemmers interesser?”… F√∂rmodligen beror detta p√• att stora delar av LO och fackf√∂reningsr√∂relsen sj√§lva √§r s.k. – socialister -, och – socialdemokrater – . De √§r itutade att – …”Internationalen f√∂r alla lycka b√§r”…, osv? Dvs. de √§r sj√§lva fullproppade med floskler om ‚Äď internationell solidaritet -, och att – arbetarr√∂relsen skall s.k. vara ‚Äď solidarisk- , och st√§lla upp och hj√§lpa alla arbetare ocks√• p√• ett internationellt plan? De √§r kanske i sj√§lva verket egentligen kommunister, och p√• s√• vis internationalister, och har ingen k√§nsla kvar f√∂r det naturliga f√∂r m√§nniskan,… Read more »

Bergfast
6 years ago
Reply to  Bergfast

Ps. Kompletterande och korr av tidigare text: …”De f√∂rst√•r inte b√§ttre om psykologiska och existentiella faktorer om och kring m√§nniskan som just ‚Äď varelse ‚Äď ? Om m√§nniskans behov av identitet, av hemmak√§nslor och n√∂dv√§ndiga k√§nslor av att kunna k√§nna igen ‚Äď sig sj√§lv ‚Äď , och kunna k√§nna samh√∂righet till, k√§nna identifiering till, de m√§nniskor som liknar dem sj√§lva.”.. Kanske √§r det fel att mena att dessa politiker och journalister inte – f√∂rst√•r – , dessa fundamentala behov och tendenser, som √§r just likartade hos alla m√§nniskor. De f√∂rst√•r nog egentligen detta, d√§rf√∂r att de flesta av dessa propagandister,… Read more »

Britta Due Andersen
Britta Due Andersen
6 years ago
Reply to  T. Snorrason

Ja, 3F burde virkelig v√¶re mere kritisk. De kan se, hvor galt det kan g√• i multikulturelle lande med stor indvandring af fattige ufagl√¶rt som eks. USA. England f√łlger vel godt med. Jeg har altid v√¶ret stolt over, at ufagl√¶rte i Danmark kunne have en acceptabel levestandard, n√•r jeg i udlandet har fortalt om Danmark.
Jeg tror virkelig angsten for at falde ved siden af f√¶llesskabet i LO og dermed ogs√• med Socialdemokratiet er en k√¶mpe drivkraft. Ingen vil lyde “fremmedfjendske”. Denne frygt ligger og lurer konstant.

T. Snorrason
T. Snorrason
6 years ago

Hvad er der “fremmedfjendsk” i at sikre sine medlemmer bedst mulige levevilk√•r?
Det er vel, hvad man er medlem af en fagforening for?
Den import af fremmede, der finder sted, er for st√łrstedelen ubrugelig som arbejdskraft – eller direkte vil ikke i arbejde under diverse “religi√łse p√•skud – og bidrager dermed ikke til f√¶llesskabet og forringer dermed det s√•kaldte velf√¶rdssamfund.
LO b√łr snart indse, at det ikke har mange interesser sammen med vor tids Socialdemokrati og SF, i hvert fald har LO¬īs medlemmer ikke.
Måske en årsag til de gamle fagforeningers stadige frafald af medlemmer.