28
feb
Seneste opdatering: 2/3-12 kl. 0522
3 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

(with apologies to William Shakespeare who got it wrong in Hamlet; Act I Scene 4)

by Lars Hedegaard, translated by Norman Berdichevsky (March 2012)

A preface by the translator, Dr. Norman Berdichevsky, author of An Introduction to Danish Culture.

Americans generally have an idyllic picture of the Scandinavian countries especially with regard to democratic institutions, human rights and civil liberties. Nevertheless, the debilitating effects of massive Muslim immigration and political correctness in Sweden have become increasingly apparent and raised considerable unease in nearby Denmark. An important consideration to bear in mind is that while Denmark is a member of NATO, Sweden has a long tradition of neutrality (that included close economic cooperation with Nazi Germany during the first few years of World War II). Sweden has distanced itself not only from the sentiments of Scandinavian cooperation, Western civilization, Judeo-Christian tradition respect for women and the fundamental rights of free speech and expression but is openly pandering to Islamist isolationist resistance to integration within Swedish society.

The following is a translation of Lars Hedegaard’s article “Svenske tilstande” in Sappho.dk – organ of the Danish Free Speech Society Feb. 3, 2012.

A climate prevails in Sweden that recalls the preliminary stage of totalitarianism according to Gunnar Sandelin who lost his job on account of his views.

The Swedish Spring

.Se videre på New English Review.

“Der er ingen fremtid for de kristne i Mellemøsten”

Uddrag af en åbenhjertig artikel af Politikens Marcus Rubin. Da diktatorerne herskede, flygtede hard-core muslimer til Europa, jvf . f.eks. Ayathollah Khomeiny og vores egen Abu Laban, tre gange smidt ud af to lande for sin fanatisme. Nu har vi så dem i Europa, hvor de kan terrorisere vantro videre. Den næste flygtningebølge er de sidste tilbageværende kristne, der flygter for deres liv og det muslimske barbari. De turde være værdigt trængende. Send fire hard-core muslimer hjem for hver kristen vi redder livet på, der er kun 4 millioner tilbage i MENA landene, “jødespørgsmålet” i MENA er som bekendt løst, når man lige ser bort fra Israel.

Det kan ikke være svært at skrive ned, hvad der kvalificerer til udsendelse af muslimske fanatikere fra Europa, og det er ikke uvæsentligt ren prævention for kommende europæere, der så slipper for deres egne krige med vor tids herrefolk. Dette vil naturligvis aldrig ske, så vi må bare leve eller dø med følgerne af vores udeladelsessynder. Mon vores udenrigsminister, der lige har bevilliget 33.8 mio til KVINFO-Det arabiske forår, – de går f.eks. til en kandidatuddannelse i International Køn og Udvikling i Yemen, – læste denne artikel og blev lidt klogere på, hvem der kæmper for “forår” i Syrien?

Stort set overalt i den arabiske verden er antallet af kristne faldende på grund af en giftig kombination af diskrimination, vold og generel marginalisering i en region, der er blevet mere islamisk og langt mere konservativ i løbet af den seneste generation. Kun 4 procent af indbyggerne i Mellemøsten – omkring 13 millioner mennesker – er i dag kristne, mindre end i nogen anden region i verden ifølge Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
Mest markant er det gået i Irak, hvor op imod to tredjedele af de halvanden million kristne er flygtet efter den amerikanske invasion i 2003 og Saddam Husseins fald, og med det arabiske forår truer udviklingen med at gentage sig i resten af regionen.
I Egypten er snesevis af kristne koptere blevet dræbt i kampe i det seneste år. Kirker er blevet brændt ned, og i efteråret anslog Vatikanet, at mere end 100.000 kristne allerede har forladt Egypten siden revolutionen.
»Det har aldrig været værre«, forklarer Estemalek Amir, der arbejder som hjælpepræst i en af kirkerne i Kairos gamle centrum, og det er budskabet fra kristne i samtlige de lande, som det arabiske forår indtil videre er skyllet ind over.
I Tunesien, det måske mest moderate arabiske land overhovedet, har vinderen af valget, det islamistiske parti Ennahda, til de godt 20.000 kristne tuneseres store bekymring erklæret, at den nye forfatning skal være mere i retning af sharia end hidtil.
I Libyen ser de kristne frygtsomt på, hvordan tidligere al-Qaeda-krigere er kommet til magten og vil stille op til valget senere på året, og i konfliktramte Syrien gruer de kristne for deres skæbne, hvis Assad-regimet falder.
Allerede nu er talrige syriske kristne ifølge lokale organisationer blevet kidnappet, voldtaget og myrdet rundt om i landet på grund af deres tro.
»Vi er skrækslagne for, at radikale muslimer får magten i Syrien«, siger Claude, en kristen husmor i Damaskus, der kun ønsker at offentliggøre sit fornavn til Politiken. »Vi er bange for at blive andenklassesborgere – for lad os ikke narre os selv: Der findes ikke noget demokratisk islam.
De vil tvinge alle i landet til at leve som dem selv«, siger hun, og den holdning er uhyre udbredt blandt kristne i det kon-fliktramte land. »Da folk i Homs og mange andre steder i Syrien begyndte at citere Koranen og bruge radikale udtryk under demonstrationerne, blev det meget klart for os kristne, at det ikke havde noget at gøre med en ‘ sekulær intellektuel opposition’«, siger Sammy Khouri, en butiksejer i Damaskus. [..] – (“Der er ingen fremtid for de kristne i Mellemøsten” – Politiken, 26.02.2012, ikke online. Se også lederen Hvad nu, Syrien?) og Tunisia: No veils in class, Salafist students attack teachers, Why Islamists will just keep winning, Tunisia claims to have broken up terror group trained in Libya eller David Greenfields: Learning to Love Big Brotherhood.

Annoncer fra Danske Partner-Ads:


Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

  • Limewoody

    Hvor lidt medierne holder sig opdateret om det “Arabiske Forår (TM)” kom til udtryk forleden i en reportage fra Syrien, hvor reporteren pippede løs om de lyse fremtidsudsigter for landets muslimske, kristne og jødiske samfund, når Assad var væk. Åbenbart var den repræsentanten for den 4. statsmagt fuldstændig uinformeret om tingenes rette tilstand. Det engang så talstærke jødiske samfund er reduceret til mindre end 25 (femogtyve) personer – og i mange år har racistiske love gjort livet mere end surt for de tilbageværende. Det kristne samfund siver ligeså stille væk grundet dagligdags forfølgelse og diskrimination og såfremt Assad bliver væltet kan man forvente en intensivering.

    For nylig stod at læse i International Bulletin of Missionary Research at over 100 000 kristne hvert år de sidste ti år er blevet myrdet alene pga. af deres religiøse overbevisning primært i muslimske lande. Se her: http://www.internationalbulletin.org/archive/all/2011/1.

    Det kan jo undre at den slags tal forbigås i larmende tavshed af Det Mediale Venstreparti – da jo fortællingen om Srebrenica-massakren – der foregik i krigstid – næsten har opnået kult-status i de samme medier – og som sådan holdes op om vesteuropæernes næse, når som helst en lejlighed byder sig.

    Hvorfor mon????

  • Josefina Bergfast

    The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to corrupt
    By Timothy Matthews
    Issue: March 2009

    (Kopierade utdrag av Timothy Matthews artikel från 2009:)

    “Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.

    Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy.

    To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order.

    Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

    To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the Frankfurter School recommended (among other things):

    1. The creation of racism offences.

    2. Continual change to create confusion

    3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children

    4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority

    5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.

    6. The promotion of excessive drinking

    7. Emptying of churches

    8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime

    9. Dependency on the state or state benefits

    10. Control and dumbing down of media

    11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

    One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women.

    To further their aims they would:

    • attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.

    • abolish differences in the education of boys and girls

    • abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces

    • declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’

    Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus:

    ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’

    The School believed there were two types of revolution:

    (a) political and

    (b) cultural.

    Cultural revolution demolishes from within.

    ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’.

    They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

    The Family

    The School’s ‘Critical Theory’ preached that the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family – an idea directly linked to Friedrich Engels ’Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State’ , which promoted matriarchy.

    Already Karl Marx had written, in the ‘Communist Manifesto’, about the radical notion of a ‘community of women’ and in ‘The German Ideology’ of 1845, written disparagingly about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. This was one of the basic tenets of the ‘Critical Theory’:

    The necessity of breaking down the contemporary family.

    The Institute scholars preached that:

    ‘Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.’

    Following Karl Marx, the School stressed how the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family—it was Marx who wrote so disparagingly about the idea of the family being the basic unit of society.

    All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of ‘women’s liberation’ and by the New Left movement in the 1960s.”

    • Josefina Bergfast

      Ps.

      Timothy Matthews is the editor of the British, Catholic Family News. A news service of the National Association of Catholic Families, United Kingdom. The article appeared in the American Catholic weekly, The Wanderer, December 11, 2008. It is reprinted here with permission of the author.

      © Copyright 1997-2009 Catholic Insight
      Updated: Mar 17th, 2009 – 22:50:54

      Ds.