Seneste opdatering: 4/3-13 kl. 1614
16 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

Av S.R.Larson

Sweden is on a downbound path that sooner or later will hurl the country into social chaos. The fact that this has not happened yet is entirely due to Swedes still believing that their country is a stable, functional welfare state. They are like the famous bumble bee, which can’t fly but does not know it can’t.

Flag of Sweden

There is a mysterious obsession with Sweden among American libertarians. They superficially glance at some isolated piece of legislation and suggest America follow the Swedish example. Having grown up in Sweden, and having escaped its oppressive tax system, its depressing social collectivism and cultural mediocrity, I am baffled by these Swedeophiles. The country I left for good 14 years ago had deteriorated pretty badly already then, and things have not gotten better.

If anything, Sweden is a prime example of what happens when you go out of your way to try and save a welfare state that is sucking the life out of its host organism, the private sector. From deteriorating schools to a health care system in real crisis, Sweden serves only one meaningful role: as a scarecrow in the cornfields of big government, deterring the sane, common-sensical observer from ever setting his foot there.

In previous articles I have explained how Sweden’s “successful” welfare state, recently praised by The Economist, is little more than an attempt at selling welfare-state snake oil; I explained that young Swedes are not only unemployed by the masses, leaving the country in desperate pursuit of a life, but those who stay are stuck living with their parents at alarming rates; I have pointed to the explosive problem with mass immigration of welfare-dependent illiterates from the poorest corners of the Third World; how the Swedish police is literally capitulating before the onslaught of organized crime; I have asked why such friends of liberty as Freedom Works are so appreciative of the grotesquely big Swedish welfare state, and I dispelled the myth that the Swedish treasury secretary, Anders Borg, is some kind of low-tax crusader.

In fact, On February 13 Mr. Borg explained in a tax policy debate in the Swedish parliament that he opposed flat income taxes and favors a steeply marginal, multi-bracket income tax code because, he said, it is an important income redistribution instrument.

In other words, Sweden is still the full-fledged, “democratic” socialist welfare state it has been since the 1970s. The fact that the treasury secretary has a pony tail and knows folksy-talk does not make a tangible difference.

What does make a difference, but for the worse, is that yet another hallmark of the Swedish welfare state is now crumbling. The retirement system, overhauled 20 years ago in a reform praised as “free market based”, is under such severe pressure that the parliament may have to raise the retirement age to 75. Euractiv reports:

Swedes should be prepared to work until they are 75 and to change careers in the middle of their work life if they are to keep the welfare standards they expect, Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt said. The retirement age is being debated in the Swedish parliament ahead of an expected pension reform package in April. In its proposal, the government wants to give people the right to remain at work until 69 instead of the current 67 cut-off age.

Let’s just make a brief stop here and notice something. The government in Sweden bans you from working when you turn 67. It is illegal for you to seek employment above that age. People get around that by starting small consulting businesses, but the law is still a good example of how the big, Swedish nanny state operates: anything that is not explicitly permitted is forbidden by default. Back to Euractiv:

Meanwhile, the right to early retirement would be delayed by two years, to 63. However, Reinfeldt said in several interviews over the weekend that Sweden must consider taking the step even further by raising the retirement age to 75. “This is a time of changes in the global world economy. The nations we meet in open competitions don’t have our welfare ambitions. They don’t put taxes on production to finance the pension system or welfare solutions. Therefore the question remains, is our equation correct?”

The man is delusional. This has nothing to do with saving the export industry. The big corporations that have characterized the Swedish private sector since at least the 1950s are either dead (SAAB Automobile), gone abroad (ABB; Pharmacia), gobbled up by foreign corporations (Ericsson; Volvo Cars; Scania) or in the process of leaving Sweden (Volvo Heavy Trucks). This is part of a natural industrial cycle, where big, mature corporations lose out to new, more dynamic business models. Just look at how the Japanese car manufacturers capitalized on the stale, bureaucratic inefficiency that characterized the Big Three in Detroit back in the ’80s.

Mr. Reinfeldt’s problem is instead that his welfare state has suppressed private-sector activity outside of the big, old manufacturers. Up until a few years ago the corporate landscape in Sweden looked almost exactly the same as it did half a century earlier. Since about 2007, the big old dinosaurs have been in an increasingly ailing condition, unable to function as the “engines” of the private sector. But since Swedish tax policies, labor market laws and other regulations have been tailored to the needs of those big corporations, they have made it very difficult for small, new, dynamic businesses to grow.

Therefore, what Mr. Reinfeldt is really seeing is that his country’s private sector can no longer feed the welfare state because it is dominated by over-subsidized, under-challenged industrial behemoths with bureaucratic arthritis. And he is utterly incapable of dealing with the situation, because he wants to protect the welfare state at all cost. Including this ridiculous retirement reform, of which Euractiv has more to say:

Reinfeldt, who leads a centre-right government, also said half of today’s children in Sweden can expect to become 100 years old and there has to be a change in the way the Swedes view their work life. “Therefore, Sweden must as a society ask ourselves the question: are we ready to meet these changes? The changes are basically positive. But if we want good pensions and welfare then we need to start discussing what our work lives should look like,” the prime minister said in a radio interview.

To begin with, I would seriously question the suggestion that half of Sweden’s children will live to be 100. Given how their health care system has deteriorated over the past 15 years, and such socially destructive factors as widespread depression and serious levels of alcohol consumption among the young, I would question if the average life expectancy will in fact stay where it is today. It is more likely that it will actually decline over the next couple of decades.

More importantly, though, is the fact that Mr. Reinfeldt – an alleged conservative – adamantly believes that it is the business of government to dictate when people are allowed to retire, and when they are allowed to work. All this shows is that Mr. Reinfeldt is just another statist European social democrat.

A far better approach would be to say that “we see such dramatic changes in the ability of the economy to support today’s retirement system that we will allow everyone to keep their own money and invest for retirement as they see fit”.

Some would rightly point out that Sweden already has a system of private retirement accounts within the government-run model. This is correct, but the ability of that system to fund future retirement is entirely dependent on an ailing economy. The pay-as-you-go part suffers from the same problems as our American Social Security system, while the private account part can only give good returns on investments if the Swedish economy is doing well. Which it is not. More on that later. For now, back to Euractiv:

To be able to work until the age of 75, the Swedish prime minister says he envisions at least one career change during a person’s work life as the job one may have as a young person could become too tough or stressful later on. Reinfeldt acknowledges that this will require a huge change of mindset among the Swedish population. “It’s a very challenging idea. Our whole life is affected by the fact that we speak to a career counselor, make a decision, and then think we will work with the same things for the rest of our lives,” the prime minister stated.

The real issue here is that Sweden has a serious under-employment problem already as things are today. Youth unemployment is among the highest in Europe, and laid-off 40-somethings have enormous problems landing a new job. The work force is being expanded by up to 100,000 immigrants each year, yet the labor market can only add a net of 60-70,000 new jobs annually (and that is in a strong growth year).

On top of that, Sweden has very rigid labor market laws compared to other “free” economies. Unions are exceptionally strong, with all the negative consequences that follow. Firing workers is a significant undertaking, which makes employers balk at hiring people for full-time positions. Labor-based taxes put a steep price on new jobs, as do the responsibilities that employers have for income replacement when workers are home sick.

The bottom line is that the Swedish economy does not suffer from a shortage of labor. It suffers from a shortage of jobs. To force people to stay in the work force up to the age of 75 under such circumstances is – forgive my repetitive use of the term – delusional. I can only see one logical motive: to try to cut the cost of the retirement system while keeping it in place.

In other words: the purpose of the reform is to make people pay taxes in to the retirement system for several more years and take benefits out of it over a shorter period of time. But there will be no attempt to give people a chance to opt out entirely. A classic example of how a government applies austerity measures to save a welfare state it does not want to let go of, come Scylla or Charybdis.

And they will come. Sweden is on a downbound path that sooner or later will hurl the country into social chaos. The fact that this has not happened yet is entirely due to Swedes still believing that their country is a stable, functional welfare state.

They are like the famous bumble bee, which can’t fly but does not know it can’t, so it does it anyway. And just like the bumble bee, once the truth dawns on them, the Swedes will fall flat to the ground. From a cynical viewpoint, it will offer us an opportunity to study the last stages of the deterioration of a welfare state in a full-scale laboratory.

From a human viewpoint, though, it is going to be one big tragedy, brought upon an entire people by simple-minded socialist politicians, determined to shove their ideological construct down people’s throats. I can only thank my lucky star I left that place 14 years ago.

(Artiklen er gengivet med forfatterens tilladelse)

Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?


Posted: 4 marts 2013 - 20:55 - Svar

Brilliant !
My son, studying in the States have sent me a lot af articles over the last three years .
And the facts You so correctly present, is so increadably pin point.

Thank You .


Posted: 4 marts 2013 - 23:41 - Svar

Hi Larson, good to see you back in the Swedish debate!

“I am baffled by these Swedeophiles”

I have reflected over the same issue and as far as I can see, there is at least one relevant parallel: Ireland. Everybody loved the Celtic tiger for many years, until it became obvious that the whole thing was just another housing driven credit boom, that was followed by a terrible bust. We are still in the credit boom phase…..

But the bust in Sweden will be far worse, since we will not only be confronted by a very painful economic downturn (in Ireland the GDP fell around 20%) but at the same time will face maybe a million aggressive third world persons that came here to collect welfare. Not that I blame them, I would have done the same in their shoes. But they will not be happy when the money runs out and the stage will be set for large scale ethnic conflict. My advise is to get out while it is still possible.

Utflyttad svensk.

Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 00:19 - Svar

Thank God I already have.

S R larson

Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 01:40 - Svar


I like your reference to Ireland, and I think you are dead on about the near future for Sweden. Over the past 20 years government has gotten away with eroding entitlements and increasing the tax burden, especially indirectly, but that is no longer a workable strategy. The pressure on the private sector seems to have reached a point of no return.

I am trying to take a strictly scholarly view on this, in order to dispassionately identify the course of events over the next few years. It is difficult, though, given it’s the country I grew up in, and had to leave because of serious economic and legal mismanagement.


PisseNisse i Hökarängen

Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 10:00 - Svar

Exakt. Och en sak till, man har bestämt att Sverige inte skall ha någon industri. (Den kan Tyskland ta hand om?)

Vår konkurrent Tyskland avser (kan & vill) kompensera sin tunga industri för de ökade “klimatavgifter” den påläggs. Sverige har inget utrymme till samma manöver (och vill inte heller). Följden kan en femåring räkna ut.

Det är ett genomgående mönster att svenska makthavare inte ägnar sig åt sitt folk, siktet är inställt på att gynna andra länders folk, berika sig själva och skaffa skattefria internationella toppjobb.

Exempel där makthavarna rent förskingrat Sveriges rätt: att avstå från att tillgodoräkna sig den rena svenska vattenkraften, att avstå från gratispengar från EU (tex bondepension, EU betalar bondens pension, Sverige har avstått). Den svenska minerallagen som säger att vilken utlänning som helst kan öppna gruva på din mark och betala en promille, skulle kallas grov kolonial utsugning om det var i Afrika! Så vad ska svenskarna leva på, (förutom utländska gruvor som ger 0,1%)?

Kebabtillverkning och genusvetenskap?


    Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 10:35 - Svar

    Detta är den tragiska sanningen, problemet är att få allmänheten att förstå det innan vi nått avgrunden…..


    Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 10:43 - Svar

    @ PisseNisse i Hökarängen,

    Pga. en mängd olika orsaker närmar sig Sverige väldigt snabbt ett sammanbrott. Man kan filosofera om orsakerna och mekanismerna bakom detta tills man blir helt utmattad, vilket jag delvis har gjort. Men mer relevant just nu är sätta sig själv och sina nära och kära i säkerhet. Det är fortfarande väldigt lätt som svensk att flytta till ett annat västland. Detta lär förändras drastiskt när sammanbrottet kommer, ty övriga länder är absolut inte interesserade av inflöde från kollapsade mångkulturer. Min gissning är att det kommer vara visumtvång inom fem år till de flesta västländer om man reser med svenskt pass.

      PisseNisse i Hökarängen

      Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 14:48 - Svar

      @ Utlandssvensk

      Jo, det är ju lätt att blodtrycket stiger, men numera betraktar jag det mest som en tragedi som måste spelas klart. Det ligger ju i sakens natur att det måste bli sämre, innan det – kanske, kanske – kan bli bättre. Liksom du är jag ju utflyttad, men många nära och kära därhemma beter sig ungefär som judarna i tredje riket. “Normalcy bias” är väl en lämplig beteckning.

      När det gäller viseringsfriheten för svenska pass är den ju i toppklass fn, men det inte Svenne Banan förstår är att andra suveräna stater snabbt och utan pardon inför viseringstvång så snart Sverige börjar producera flyktingar och/eller inte uppfyller åtaganden. Det är hög tid att ordna med alternativa pass om man är svensk och reser mycket.


        Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 16:57 -

        @ PisseNisse i Hökarängen

        Vi verkar vara eniga på samtliga punkter!

        Men inte visste jag att Hökarängen ligger i utlandet 🙂

        Får man fråga i vilket land du bor?


        Posted: 8 marts 2013 - 07:59 -

        Høkerengen kanske? 😀


Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 10:51 - Svar

I was also surprised by the Economist unreserved tribute to the Nordic model and to Sweden in particular. I realized that the magazine basically have an view close to the socialist. In the latest issue The Economist celebrates the development in Africa, but are totally blind to all the conflicts that are, not least the development in South Africa and it seems completely to forget the enormous price increases and demand for raw materials that occurred during the period analyzed. In my analysis the later explains all of the increase in GDP. To point to the fact that people have a cell phone and make that evidence that new technology is incorporated into the society and consider it promising for future development, I think is rather shallow. I think The Economist, just like Sweden, have dropped in quality.

To analyze the evolution of a society and economy, is extremely complicated, and therefore the governing politicians get away for a long time, even if they govern in direction towards the iceberg. We saw in Sweden in the 1970s, there was a period where Sweden collapsed, but eventually made many realize that this path does not hold anymore. We have to change direction.

We saw a similar trend in the Soviet Union, in China, and probably soon also in North Korea. Sooner or later you will come to an end and change course. But it is extremely long time spans we’re talking about and different the variables in society that moves up and down, and therefore it is very difficult for the voter to observe reality other than in his wallet and in its immediate surroundings. Policy will as a result be more or less short-sighted.

In most cases, a wrong path can be reversed, but in this particular case, Sweden and possibly also Norway and Denmark, you can NOT restore the wrong policy pursued. It is impossible to repatriate millions of immigrants. I’m totally convinced that the Nordics will sooner or later realize that we cannot integrate so many new people in such a short time, it will not work, but as described above, it takes a very long time before enough people coming to this insight.
It does not take much intelligence to realize that either employed Swedes will ultimately be under further enormous fiscal pressure or the welfare state will have to burst, or why not both, and then there will be chaos in the country. The promises of the promised land will not be there anymore.

Robin Shadowes

Posted: 5 marts 2013 - 12:45 - Svar

Jag förutspår mass-självmord i kollapsens efterdyningar. Inte bara enskilda självmord, utan utökade sådana. Där hela familjer känner sådan hjälplöshet att döden ses som den enda utvägen. Trots allt har den stora delen av befolkningen inga möjligheter att emigrera av olika orsaker. När man har förlorat allt, hem, arbete, social värdighet och har ingen utbildning som gör en intressant om man flyttar utomlands. Då återstår bara döden. Denna tragedi har ännu inte spelats ut men kommer bli oerhört vanlig dom närmaste 5 åren.


    Posted: 9 marts 2013 - 07:02 - Svar

    Döden snart enda alternativet påstår du? Bara att beväpna sig och inse, att man måste börja döda för att inte själv bli dödad.

A.V. Duch

Posted: 8 marts 2013 - 04:31 - Svar

Laes Koranen og laer hvad det hele gaar ud. Proev at slaebe jer gennem hele makvaerket.

Leave a Comment