11
jun
Seneste opdatering: 11/6-13 kl. 1150
10 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

BREITBART NEWS’ INTERVIEW WITH GEERT WILDERS Wilders talte i Los Angeles søndag den 9. Talen findes endnu kun i at læse: The Resurgence of National Pride and the Future of Europe. Der er endnu et videointerview fra USA: PolitiChicks Exclusive: Geert Wilders Discusses Islamic Terrorism in EU & US

…men nogle er mere lige end andre

Norske muslimer har ‘et ambivaltnet forhold til retsstaten.’ Dette fremkommer i interviews, når det kommer til praksis er dette forhold en del mere end bare ambivaltent. Det er ikke mnage måneder siden jeg oplevede nogle svenske muslimer i en dansk retssal udvise fuldstændig despekt, og det fik de lov til.

Nye tall tyder på at muslimer har et mer ambivalent forhold til rettsstaten enn befolkningen som helhet. Muslimer vil ha like stor beskyttelse fra rettsstaten som flertallet av befolkningen, men mener samtidig at det skal gjelde særregler for dem, og at lovene ikke skal håndheves like sterkt overfor muslimer som de skal overfor nordmenn flest.

Dette kommer fram i en undersøkelse fra 2009, der resultatene ikke tidligere har vært publisert. Muslimer i Norge ser ut til å ha et ambivalent forhold til rettsstaten og sentrale norske rettslige institusjoner sett i forhold til den generelle befolkningen. Er dette oppsiktsvekkende?

Gruppene skiller seg imidlertid ganske markant fra hverandre når det gjelder håndhevelsen av lovene. Her mener muslimgruppen i større grad enn den generelle befolkningen at visse lover enten ikke skal gjelde for dem, eller at de ikke skal håndheves like strengt overfor dem. Dette er interessant, i den forstand at det viser to ting; så mange som omtrent halvparten av muslimene er villige til å begå sivil ulydighet på religiøst grunnlag, mens kun 16 prosent av den generelle befolkningen mener man må følge sin egen samvittighet.

Først og fremst var muslimene i langt større grad enn den generelle befolkningen villige til å begå sivil ulydighet dersom deres religiøse leder ga uttrykk for at en lov som Stortinget har vedtatt er umoralsk. Muslimer og rettsstaten

Annoncer fra Danske Partner-Ads:


Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

  • Erling

    OT:

    A controversial project claiming to measure anti-Muslim attacks will not have its government grant renewed after police and civil servants raised concerns about its methods.

    The project, called Tell Mama, claimed that there had been a “sustained wave of attacks and intimidation” against British Muslims after the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby, with 193 “Islamophobic incidents” reported to it, rising to 212 by last weekend.

    The group’s founder, Fiyaz Mughal, said he saw “no end to this cycle of violence”, describing it as “unprecedented”. The claims were unquestioningly repeated in the media.

    Tell Mama and Mr Mughal did not mention, however, that 57 per cent of the 212 reports referred to activity that took place only online, mainly offensive postings on Twitter and Facebook, or that a further 16 per cent of the 212 reports had not been verified. Not all the online abuse even originated in Britain.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/andrew-gilligan/10108098/Muslim -hate-monitor-to-lose-backing.html

  • Allan Hansen

    A Defeat for the Muslim Brotherhood, a Model for Winning
    The Muslim Brotherhood was handed a tactical defeat on June 4, 2013 in Manchester, TN. The FBI and DOJ (Department of Justice) appeared at a meeting called by AMAC (American Muslim Advisory Council — Muslim Brotherhood) in Manchester, TN. It was to include a talk by a US Assistant Attorney General and an FBI agent in charge. The meeting was due to a joke posted by a Coffee County Commissioner on Face Book. The DOJ Assistant Attorney General Killian said in a newspaper interview that the joke might be in the category of a hate crime.

    Over 1200 people came from all over the US to a meeting in a town of 10,000. The web had buzzed about free speech in Manchester and talk radio chimed in.

    In the course of the presentation by Killian, several in the audience began to shout our retorts to him. At first some in audience tried to shush them, but the momentum began to build and the shouted challenges increased in numbers and volume. It should be noted that the shouts were factual and knowledgeable. An example: when it was mentioned how hard it was to be a Muslim refugee: “Free medical care, welfare and scholarships tough to take?” When Killian said that DOJ protected voter rights, the shouts were to the tune of: “You mean like protecting the Panthers in Philadelphia?”

    There were also knowledgeable shouts about Islam: “We don’t care about the religion, it’s the politics. No Sharia.”

    When Killian mentioned Eric Holder, the room erupted with thunderous boos. People were angry about the Feds. The FBI agent presented a better face, but he got blow back as well. Chants of “Ruby Ridge” and “Waco” rang out. This was a “mad as hell and not going to take it anymore” attitude.

    There has been both praise and condemnation of the crowd. But to understand it, you had to be there. There was a palpable pent up anger about a long string of corruption out of the Obama White House: the IRS scandals; Major Nidal Hassan’s jihad called “work place violence”; vacuuming up everybody’s phone records; and more. They felt that the Feds were here to talk down to them, not to answer questions.

    The Feds came to talk down to them since they are considered rednecks. Those rural white people who are not politically correct are called rednecks. Rednecks are the only under-class who have no protection or advocacy. They are the only group that can be mocked, ridiculed and made the butt of jokes. The worst of the ghetto blacks are forbidden to be called the equivalent of redneck, the N word. There is no RN word. Nope, they are rednecks, trailer trash, crackers, white trash and worse.

    Another measure of society’s hatred of rednecks it this: if the shouters in the audience had been black, the media would have said that they were: “Speaking truth to power”. They would be reported as victims against oppression and fighters for social justice. But rednecks are called bigots and ignorant haters.

    Why did the rednecks have to come and oppose political Islam? Simple, our leaders will not do the job.

    The leaders in the pulpits of America are professionally ignorant cowards. Ministers and rabbis go to Family of Abraham events with Muslims and tip toe around any criticism. They cry over the Crusades and believe whatever they are told by Muslims. Over 100,000 Christians were murdered last year and there is an ongoing jihad against Israel, but not a word will be spoken to the Muslims about the Islamic crimes. Tears will be shed over graffiti on a mosque, but not one mention of Christians being machine gunned at Christmas services in Egypt.

    What university has ever held an event where the jihad doctrine of Islam is discussed? Critical thought and fact-based reasoning are not allowed in their forums and curricula. The history of the deaths of 270 million Kafirs has no place in history departments. Sharia cruelty is not taught in feminist studies. No word about Islam may be spoken without approval from the MSA (Muslim Students Association, a Muslim Brotherhood front.)

    Will law enforcement and the military protect us against political Islam? They do not even recognize the existence of an Islamic threat doctrine. All information about Islam in terrorism training must be approved by the Muslim Brotherhood.

    Will the media protect our civilization in a civilizational jihad? Not just no, but hell no! The media is Islam’s mouthpiece and a savage opponent of everyone who opposes Sharia law.
    What about American business? Islamic business fuels civilizational war with unlimited funds, just as the Koran commands. As an 11 year veteran counter-jihadist, I am unaware of American business support for the counter-jihadists. There may be small donations, but no systemic funding. Muslims get billions, and our fighters get a thousand. How will that work out?

    Well, if the preachers, rabbis, professors, reporters, military, politicians, law enforcement and business are absent in a civilizational war, who shows up? Isolated warriors such as Spencer, Geller, Bostom, and others are the front line fighters. Oh, and Tennessee rednecks.

    The Tea Party types and conservatives say that we should always be polite. My personal experience is that I have presented talks about political Islam that are very civil and polite for years. It doesn’t make any difference. I am still called a bigot, hater, Islamophobe, racist and merchant of hate. I have been told by community leaders that it is people like me that stir up the terror. They say I am an unpleasant man who frightens people. The Southern Poverty Law Center says that I am one of America’s top 10 bigots. “Doing it right” is judged to be immoral. Being nicer may not be the way to win a civilizational war.

    Our society has become so wimpy and politically correct that there is no longer any righteous anger. We have become a nation of pleasant liars who are never angered at society’s outrages. We are ever so polite to those who destroy our civilization. We are a nation of zombies, but polite zombies. There have been over 20,000 jihad attacks since September 11, 2001, but you don’t want to mention that since someone might become uncomfortable or be offended.

    For years we have watched as Muslims and dhimmis (apologists) have put on a multicultural love fest with Islam. In every case Islam has dominated. This was the first time in 11 years that the Kafirs dominated the information battle space in Tennessee — the first time.

    How do we dominate the information battle space without shouting? Analyze what went right at Manchester. Here is what we and the rednecks did right:

    • We showed up. Now is in this case we had 1500 show up, but we cannot use massive attendance as a usual tactic. However, a normal AMAC event would have put out chairs for a 100 people. We don’t need but a dozen people to dominate the meeting with information.
    • We knew the doctrine of political Islam. We knew when people were lying or telling a half-truth.
    • We knew the event was happening. We had intelligence and knew who the players were.
    • We opposed the lies by voice, leaflet and signs. This is what rednecks bring to the party—rednecks are not politically correct and speak their minds. (That is part of the reason that they are hated.) They don’t give a hoot what the media/government/church types think. This spirit must be carried into every meeting. We must speak up and speak out. This is hard for those who are ruled by being “nice”.

    We must learn how to co-opt the events without shouting. We must be organized and show up at every public event where Muslims come together with their ignorant dhimmi (apologist) partners. All of these events should become information battles. We should show up with signs and leaflets. If they will not allow signs, then bring cloth banners which can be put into bags and backpacks. We must do these things politely, but with authority like a warrior. And forget about the question and answer session for scoring points – the Q and A is always: write down your questions and we will select the ones we want to answer.

    We must invite the Muslim Brotherhood and all of their supporters, such as government agencies and ministers, to our own events to explain their position to us, not in their power position of speaking down to us, but in a round table event centered on fact based reasoning.

    The Manchester event was a rough hewn victory. We must learn lessons from it and then show up for every battle against this civilizational jihad.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
    Permalink: http://www.politicalislam.com/blog/a-defeat-for-the-muslim-brotherhood  /

  • Allan Hansen

    Jeg elsker denne sang.

    Words are flowing out like endless rain into a paper cup,
    They slither while they pass, they slip away across the universe
    Pools of sorrow, waves of joy are drifting through my open mind,
    Possessing and caressing me.
    Jai guru deva om
    Nothing’s gonna change my world,
    Nothing’s gonna change my world.
    Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes,
    They call me on and on across the universe,
    Thoughts meander like a restless wind inside a letter box they
    Tumble blindly as they make their way
    Across the universe
    Jai guru deva om
    Nothing’s gonna change my world,
    Nothing’s gonna change my world.

    Sounds of laughter shades of earth are ringing
    Through my open views inciting and inviting me
    Limitless undying love which shines around me like a million suns, it calls me on and on
    Across the universe
    Jai guru deva om
    Nothing’s gonna change my world,
    Nothing’s gonna change my world.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tjq9LmSO1eI

  • Allan Hansen
  • Allan Hansen

    Jeg står i stor gæld til George Benson
    – man kan sige, at jeg skylder ham alt
    hvad jeg véd om jazz guitar og guitar
    teknik.
    Kort sagt – jeg elsker den mand!
    George har spillet med ALLE de bedste musiker i verden!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kThHgJNZmXg

    Lev Vel

    • Allan Hansen

      George Benson største hit!

      Selv de gamle hunde begynder, at hyle.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgl1hQmjITY

      Lev Vel

      • PisseNisse i Hökarängen

        Trevlig, men inte hans största hit.

        Give Me The Night (och lustigt nog även Turn Your Love Around) nådde båda #1 R&B.

  • Jannik

    Geert wilders tale er et godt eksempel på en total fordrejning af den politisk situation, med det formål at behage sine amerikanske værter og lægge et tykt røgslør ud. USA er mindst lige så meget ude at skide som EU er. USA er et gennem korrupt land, hvor politisk kandidatur kun er muligt med mange millioner dollar i ryggen, det er et land hvor særinteresser systematisk dyrkes. To parti systemet gør det desuden ekstremt svært for nye partier at opstå og opstille til valg.

    Dernæst er der den store demografiske elefant i rummet, som Wilders meget elegant får manøvreret sig udenom. Amerikanere af europæisk afstamnning vil senest år 2050 miste den demografiske majoritet i landet, og sandsynligvis langt tid før. USAs grænser er pivåbne, og det sydlige USA er hastigt på vej til at blive en ny mexikansk enklave.

    Dernæst er der Obama dyrkelsen som nærmest har antaget religiøse højder. Deres puritanske religionsdyrkelse, deres forskruede historieløse forbruger kultur, deres sundshedsskadelige livstil, og man kunne blive ved.

    USA er lederen af den vestlig verden og er naturligvis et land i dyb dyb krise, ligesom resten af den vestlige verden. Lad jer derfor ikke narre af Wilders propaganda tale, det er hele den vestlige verden som er i dyb kulturel og økonomisk krise, og hele den vestlige verden hvor den hvide europæer er i færd med at blive befolkningsudskiftet, ikke kun i EU området.

    Dette er de uhyrlige og skinbarlige realiteter, og det er det som et stigende antal europæere er i færd med at gøre oprør mod.

  • Peter Buch

    Wilders er bedt om at tale om Europa.
    Kritik af indhold eller form kan forekomme hos kommentatorer. Eller synspunktet at andet end det af Wilders nævnte er meget mere interessant kan hævdes.

    Til alt held kan flere kommentatores kommentarer endnu gøre billedet klarere, det store perspektiv tydeligere.