Når hun idag går ud og forsvarer det muslimske tørklæde, kan det kun være fordi hun ikke har gjort sit hjemmearbejde. Det er slet ikke i første omgang kvindeundertrykkelse, det handler om. Hvis det blot var det, ville det være relativt ligegyldigt. Det ville være en sag for “Kvinder for Frihed”. Kan hænde det er jura, men det er ikke politik.
Tørklædet er helt centralt i de forskellige masterplaner, der gennem tiden har været for islamiseringen af Europa og som stadig er operationelle i de grupper, der nærer ambitionen. De er forskellige i strategi, men målet er det samme : sharia-staten. Andre midler er etableringen af institutioner (skoler, banker, moskéer), infiltrering af vestlige institutioner og slutligen, overtagelse af hele områder som autonome enklaver. Hvis Rønn Hornbech ikke ser det større billede, og kun tror tørklædet er en las tøj, er vi fortabt med hende som minister. Tror hun det er et tilfælde, at Cairo og København vrimler med tørklæder, hvor der ingen var for 20 år siden ?
Den første vigtige masterplan der dukker op, er (M. Ali Kettani “The Problems of Muslim Minorities and their Solutions” in Muslim Communities in Non-Muslim States (London: Islamic Council of Europe, 1980) pp.96-105) – beskrevet af Patrick Sookhdeo i 2005. Det er en fempunktsplan, hvor Sookhdeo beskriver bestemte områder i England, Frankrig og Holland/Belgien, som værende på stadie 4. Ingen har endnu beskyldt forskeren Sookhdeo for at være konspirationsteoretiker. (foto Sookhdeo, © Snaphanen)
En anden er Det Muslimske Broderskabs “The Project” fra 1982. Det er en 12 punkts plan.
Det er naturligvis kun 10 % hardcore islamister, der forfølger disse mål, men det tog også kun 10 % nazister og kommunister, for at omforme hele samfund. Resten rettede ind. Birthe Rønn Hornbech er en hurtiglæser. Den evne får hun brug for, og hun kan godt glemme alt hvad hun ved om kristendom, for at kunne bedømme det billede, der tegner sig ved islamificeringen gennem bla. tørklædet. Dette er en helt anden boldgade og Rønn Hornbech er ved at gå islamisternes ærinde ud af ren uvidenhed. Danmark har ikke råd til den slags ministre. Som det fremgår af en anden artikel, ser hun åbenbart islam som blot endnu en religon, som hun kan “føle fællesskab med”:
»I kristendommen er der ikke noget rent eller urent kød, og der er ikke nogle bestemte handlinger, der gør os bedre i Vorherres øjne. Og det er den dybereliggende grund til, hvorfor nogle danskere reagerer så stærkt,« siger hun og understreger, at hun som troende kristen har et stærkt fællesskab med muslimer.
Rønn Hornbech kunne spørge: “Hvad skal vi da gøre ved tørklæderne?” Det er virkelig politikernes problem, eftersom de nu selv har skabt det, men et minimumskrav må være at forbyde dem for ansatte i offenlige stillinger, ikke mindst på skoler og hospitaler. Og så vide, hvad bærerne af tørklæderne sjældent selv ved – det er islamisternes flag, der vejrer fra deres hoveder.
“Birthe Rønn Hornbech vil ændre tonen og sprogbrugen om indvandrere”
Mord er ikke mord i Sverige
Der slås 240 ihjel i Sverige om året, hvadenten de nu myrdes – eller bare blir´slået ihjel på en mindre graverende måde. Det er fem (5 !) gange flere end i Danmark. Erixon :
Brottsligheten är lägre i New York än i Sverige när det gäller alla brott – stölder, rån, inbrott, misshandel, våldtäkter – utom mord. Har det hetat. Räknat per 100.000 invånare har New York 5 mord per år. Sverige 4 mord per år. Men att Sverige har färre mord är en pappersprodukt. Ekot avslöjar att mord inte kategoriseras som mord, Hårdare brottsrubricering:
– För 20 år sedan rubricerade man annorlunda. I hälften av alla fall där unga människor hade haft ihjäl någon annan, rubricerade man det inte som uppsåtligt ärende, alltså mord eller dråp, utan som grov misshandel, eller misshandel med vållande till annans död, säger kriminolog Sven Granath.– Idag är det kanske bara max en fjärdedel av brotten som rubriceras på det här sättet, utan man döms för mord eller dråp. Så har socialflummet trollat bort grova kriminella handlingar, och förvandlat dem till någon beskedligare. Även om borttrollandet av mord minskat på senare år, visar detta på hur kriminalitet bagatelliseras. Man blundar för att en människa blivit dödad. Erixon.com
”Skolmiljön har den karaktären att det kan uppstå mycket konflikter”
udtaler Stockhoms-Bob, kriminologen Jerzy Sarnecki til AB , hvis læge burde indrage hans stående recept på Valium, som han tydeligvis spiser som bolscher. I det hele taget må man spørge sig, om kriminologien overhovedet er klædt på til at beskrive det samfund, der nu er grundlagt. Hvis den mener at være det, kan I kalde mig “kriminolog”:
Rektorn på Källskolan i Kungsängen norr om Stockholm knivskars på onsdagen av en person i 20-årsålder. Flera personer såg överfallet där gärningsmannen gav sig på rektorn och knivskar honom. – Vi har tagit hand om ett flertal chockade personer som blev vittnen till händelsen, säger Björn Engström på polisens länskommunikationscentral.
den anholdte er fire gange dømt for trusler og mishandling, men den kristne skole vælger ikke at anmelde ham. Det er vel sand kristendom. Rektor knivskuren av elev
Paul Weston : Cool war – Warm War – Hot War II
by Paul Weston (Cool War — Warm War — Hot War, part I)
The second strand of the cool war is the political/propaganda war, which we are also losing. Whether this is this because our ruling elites are terrified of Islamic aggression, harbour a loathing of the West bordering on the suicidal, or exhibit ignorance verging on the criminally negligent is not completely clear at the present moment, but may yet be discovered at some future Nuremberg style war trials.
As “The Religion Of Peace” bombs, beheads, maims, murders and rapes its way around the globe, the citizens of the West find themselves inhabiting some sort of parallel universe where the daily evidence placed before their eyes is flatly contradicted by their own liberal ruling elites. Western politicians appear to have appraised the situation and made a decision, based on short-term political expediency, to side with an alien culture that promises violence rather than their own indigenous people, who peacefully — to date — accept pretty much anything.
The attempt by Western liberals to portray Islam as the religion of peace is nothing short of pathological. In a sane world this would not be possible, but the West is no longer sane, and this is the message promulgated by our political, media and educational establishments. (foto © Snaphanen)
The Muslim radicals, acutely aware of what would happen if Christians emigrated en masse to say, Saudi Arabia, and behaved as they themselves do in the West, can only rub their eyes in amazed disbelief at not only what they are able to get away with, but the subsequent debased reaction from their victims, manifested in the cringing appeasement of Western elites as they apologise for their wicked existence and prostrate themselves before Allah.
Prostrate themselves before Allah! What a typical example of reactionary, right wing, racist hysteria the liberal/left will shriek, but how does one explain the following?
When Islamic terrorists blow us up in skyscrapers, trains, metros and buses, the ruling elites immediate response is to ask what wrongs the West must surely have perpetrated in order to attract such animosity. If no particular wrong can be found, our politicians will try to explain it away as the result of poverty and oppression, and should that prove to be false, then some past act of Christian aggression from the 11th century, or the full moon, or Europe’s dreary weather, or anything, simply anything, save the one simple, unpalatable truth: Jihad for the sake of Allah in pursuit of the Global Caliphate.
After 9/11, the FBI asked the terrorist linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to provide “sensitivity training” for their agents, whilst in the wake of the 7/7 transport bombings in London, leaders from the Muslim Brotherhood were asked to help draft the new anti-terror laws, which included the notification of Muslim communities prior to any police raids, the requirement by the police to remove their shoes and socks before entering a Muslim house, times when they could and could not carry out said raids, and the stipulation that police dogs were strictly “canina non grata.”
In France, the Muslim street riots of 2005 led to French politicians promising more money for the banlieus and agreeing to turn a blind eye to the Sharia courts, the honour killings and the polygamy carried out within them. In Belgium, native socialist sympathisers have allied themselves with Islam and now politically dominate Brussels, where they use this political clout to ban demonstrations protesting Islam’s growing political control in Europe.
In Holland, 2006, the Dutch justice minister, Piet Hein Donner had no objection to Sharia law being imposed, providing it was done democratically, and in Sweden, integration minister Jens Orback declared: “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”
In Spain the Madrid train bombings ushered in a new era of dhimmified government more in tune with Islam’s demands and in Britain, after yet another transit bombing by the religion of peace, Hazel Blears, the Home Office Minister, immediately set up a committee to advise and “reassure” Muslims on the “Islamophobic” backlash (which never materialised) and said: “What we have discussed today is the need to teach the true nature of Islam, which is about peace and love.”
The legislation emanating from the European Court Of Human Rights has meant terrorists wanted for questioning in Egypt and Syria are allowed to remain free in Britain, lest they be tortured if their extradition were granted, whilst Oriana Fallaci, whose passionate love for Italy and democracy was proven in her resistance against Mussolini’s fascist state, was forced to die in exile in America, even as the Italian courts pressed for her extradition to face charges contravening EU laws on racism and xenophobia.
Her crime? She wrote two deeply moving books, The Rage And The Pride and The Force of Reason, lamenting the death of her beloved Italy and its replacement by resurgent Islam. If she had sought refuge in any EU country, she would have been forcibly extradited by Europol under another new EU law, The European Arrest Warrant, and tried by Eurojust, who along with Europol now possess powers that override those of nation states; their personnel are also covered by diplomatic immunity. These people were not fit to wait on her table; the idea that she had to flee them is obscene.
When Jewish graveyards were desecrated in France and Germany a few years ago, the EU commissioned a report, assuming it was the work of the Neo-Nazi “right”. When it turned out, all too predictably, to be the work of the followers of Mohammed, the report was quietly shelved and replaced with one six months later, exonerating the Muslims. Or to use Oriana Fallaci’s words, “the sons of Allah.”
When investigations (Daily Mail, 23 Nov 2005. No link) suggested that some 2,000 young Muslims — annually — attend terrorist training camps in Britain for unarmed combat training, the politicians and media tell us that it is only a tiny minority of Muslims who wish us harm, a lie countered by Daniel Pipes who has a web page devoted to surveys revealing the true extent of support for radical Islam. The politicians and the media, who prefer to call Pipes an extremist, ignore this site.
The manipulative tactics of EU politicians do not stop at mere misrepresentation; they also use their new laws to curtail free speech. The rights of Freedom of Assembly, and Freedom of Expression, as ordained by the EU, do not hold up to close inspection. The attempt to hold a demonstration in Brussels on 9/11 2007 was thwarted lest our freedom of expression interfere with Islam’s freedom not hear it. Terry Davis, the socialist Secretary General of The Council of Europe, put out the following press release:
It is very important to remember that the freedom of assembly and expression can be restricted to protect the rights and freedoms of others, including the freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This applies to everyone in Europe including the millions of Europeans of Islamic faith, who were the main target of today’s shameful display of bigotry and intolerance.”
One cannot pick and choose freedom of speech, it either exists, in which case one lives in a democracy, or it does not, and one does not. Islam is not simply a religion; it is also a political ideology. The EU has therefore made the protest of a political movement illegal. This is totalitarianism.
When Nick Griffin of the BNP predicted — before the London transport bombings of 7/7 — that Britain would be attacked, that the terrorists would be home grown “British boys” and that Islam was a “wicked, vicious faith,” he was prosecuted and tried not once but twice, in an attempt to jail him for inciting racial hatred. When he was found not guilty, the government’s response, at the behest of Muslim leaders, was to bring in a new law, The Racial and Religious Hatred Act under which they could be more confident of jailing him the next time he correctly predicted a terrorist attack and accused Islam of being wicked and nasty.
Contrast this with the surreal antics of the British police when radical imams were exposed calling for the overthrow of the West in Channel 4’s undercover dispatches program. The immediate response of the police was not to prosecute the imams for sedition and incitement to racial hatred, but the makers of the program themselves! By drawing attention to genuine racial and religious hatred, Channel 4 was accused of inciting racial hatred. This is more than merely bizarre; this is insane.
To date, not one of the Islamic preachers has been tried and prosecuted, despite calling for the murder of Jews and homosexuals, the beating of women and the subjugation of the infidel kuffar. A BNP member calling for the death of “niggers” would quite rightly be arrested and prosecuted, whilst I, as a white European Christian “kafir,” can be abused in a similar vein with impunity. This situation is fast becoming intolerable.
When Muslim radicals see this craven appeasement they become, quite naturally, emboldened. Despite being a significant minority, they are aware that they can punch well above their weight, which in Britain now means pushing for Sharia schools and a semi Sharia state.
In February 2007, The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) issued a 72-page manifesto demanding that British schools adopt Islamic guidelines. These included pretty much everything you would expect of a school in Saudi Arabia, including veils for ALL female students, full-length swimming costumes for boys, and separate wash areas for Muslims. The report, which was available at the MCB website has since mysteriously disappeared.
Dr Bari, the Secretary General of the MCB, also thinks the British should adopt arranged marriage, recruit 3,000 Muslim policemen in London to “restore trust,” attend Muslim institutions, stop drinking and gambling and accept Muslim dress codes, saying: “That is another thing the British should learn from us, modesty is attractive.”
If Europeans try to resist further Muslim immigration, they are liable to fall foul of being labelled xenophobic, which under EU laws can carry a prison term of up to three years. If the native British resist the MCB’s ongoing Islamisation of their country then they could, in Bari’s words, only be compared to Nazi Germany. In other words: Peace On Our Terms, as prescribed by Islam and the EU.
Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Islamic movement banned in Middle-Eastern countries and dedicated to bringing about a global Islamic Caliphate, was supposed to be banned by the British government in the wake of the 7/7 bombings. It has not, and one if its leaders actually works in the Home Office’s Immigration and Nationality Directorate. Needless to say, membership of the BNP would preclude you from such a position.
Whilst we are busy denying our culture, Islam is busy promoting theirs. If they run into difficulties, a simple accusation of racism tends to make any potential resistance disappear, whilst our appeasement, increasingly mandated by legal requirement, is one part of our culture that Islam has no problem interacting with. The result of their aggression, combined with their tactical awareness of how to use our appeasing liberalism against ourselves, has bought them a great many political concessions, where our culture and our civilisation are forced to bow to theirs.
Halal food is served in many public institutions, swimming baths have Muslim only sessions, crosses are removed from public areas, Christmas is downplayed lest it upset Muslim sensibilities, the Holocaust is dropped from school curricula, as it opposes the Holocaust denial that Muslim children are taught at home and in the mosques. The police drastically lower their entry standards in order to fill racial quotas and then stand idly by as street preaching imams promote death and destruction to the West, spurred into activity on occasion only to arrest members of the native population who heckle or attempt to take photographs.
The EU passes laws criminalizing the indigenous population if they speak out, backed up by national governments that do the same. The police arrest us on the slightest pretext, yet ignore genuine hatred emanating from Islamic preachers, and our politicians appear to have tacitly accepted that peace can only be bought off via our appeasement. Living in Europe is becoming a wholly surreal experience that defies logic and reason as we slowly sink into state-enforced Dhimmitude.
The various councils, parliaments, brotherhoods and associations, all prefixed by “Muslim” are driven more by political ambition than religious empathy, and their advance is both remorseless and relentless. The political parties representing the indigenous peoples of the West are retreating, apologising, appeasing and betraying. We are not just losing the political war. We are being annihilated.
To be continued in part three: The Propaganda War.
Gates of Vienna – klik for at se fotos og links
