“As I foretold you, were all spirits, and, Are melted into air, into thin air…….We are such stuff, As dreams are made on; and our little life, Is rounded with a sleep”

Mange islamiske hellige krigere er ifølge ny britisk forskning inspireret af drømme. – Foto: MOHAMMED BALLAS/AP

Imagine there’s no jihad. De prøver og prøver, derinde på Politiken, og fantasien fejler ikke noget, og der er også altid de notoriske britiske forskere – dem der påtænker at boykotte ethvert samarbejde med israelske akademikere – til at levere ny udenomssnak. Som jeg plejer at skrive, så er jeg overbevist om at rigtig mange i Vesten aldrig vil droppe deres livsløgne. Det er først når deres egen og deres families fysiske sikkerhed bliver truet, og idealerne ikke kan bruges til en disse, at de evt. vil kræve indgreb (LFPC).

En drøm under nattesøvnen, også kaldet en ruya, kan have ganske stor indflydelse på militante muslimers tankegang. Sådan lyder konklusionen på ny forskning udført af den britiske socialantropolog dr. Iain Edgar fra Durham University.

Islam en stor drømmekultur
»Islam er sandsynligvis den største drømmekultur i verden i dag«, siger Iain Edgar, og fortsætter:

»Den natlige drøm menes at give adgang til både metafysisk og guddommelig indsigt, at være en praktisk alternativ og tilgængelig kilde til inspiration og vejledning, og til at byde på klarhed omkring handling i denne verden«. […] Militante muslimer inspireres af drømme

Hvorfor bliver indenlandske turister væk fra Malmø ?

Fordi de kender byen, selvfølgelig. “Prøv at lov dem en skudsikker vest” foreslår en lokal på nettet. Med 45 % tilvandrede hvoraf 25 % muslimer, – lige så mange som i Marseilles – er Malmø på drift ud i det store intet. Malmø er et minibillede på det kommende Europa. Byen er sejlet lidt i forvejen. Københavnere bør nok håbe på vestenvind indtil videre, selvom det er en stakket frist.

Turistsatsningen Mer Malmö drar i morgon, på nationaldagen, igång sin kampanj för att locka fler inhemska turister till Malmö. Det blir aktiviteter på sträckan mellan Gallerian vid Sergels Torg och Kungsträdgården i Stockholm och i butiksdistriktet i Nordstan i Göteborg med diverse erbjudanden och en tävling med Malmövistelse som pris.
Malmö söker fler sommargäster

Hvordan fejerer 160 nationaliteter nationaldag ? Sådan her: Blågult firande av nationaldagen i Rosengården. Det hele kan virke lidt artificielt og skrøbeligt, når man nu ved at Rosengård har måttet inddeles i etniske afdelinger, for ikke at give anledning til for mange voldeligheder. Af Malmø kan man lære, at “multikultur” er et sprogligt luftkastel. Der er én kultur eller ingen. Og ingen kultur er som bekendt barbari, hvad der da også er på vej til at blive det generelle billede af byen. Det er  nok derfor irakeren her føler sig hjemme:

The European Union, A Prison of Nations
by Srdja Trifkovic

Various multiethnic states (imperial Russia, the Habsburg Monarchy, pre-World War II Kingdom of Yugoslavia) have been labeled—often unfairly—as “prisons of nations.” That designation will apply more aptly to the European Union when the Lisbon Treaty, signed by all 27 EU heads of states or governments last December, takes effect next year. Under the “European Arrest Warrant,” which is to be implemented under the terms of the Treaty, every citizen or visitor of a member country the European Union will be liable to arrest and extradition at the behest of a judge in any other EU member-country, under one of 32 vaguely defined categories of “crime.”

This is a momentous development, and not one in a hundred EU citizens, let alone non-EU visitors to Europe, are fully aware of its implications.

Those 32 offenses, according to the drafters of the Treaty, “if they are punishable in the issuing Member State by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years and as they are defined by the law of the issuing Member State, shall, under the terms of this Framework Decision and without verification of the double criminality of the act, give rise to surrender pursuant to a European arrest warrant.”

The list of 32 offenses includes criminal conspiracy, terrorism, human trafficking, child pornography, smuggling of drugs, weapons and explosives, fraud and money laundering, murder, kidnapping, forgery, etc. It also includes “racism and xenophobia,” as well as “computer crime” and “crimes under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.” The local police will be obliged to arrest the indicted person and have him transferred to the issuing judge’s court for trial—and they will have to act regardless of their country’s judicial system or penal code.

Once the person is at the local court, he will be at the mercy of the local laws. The involvement of the ICC implies possible further extradition to non-EU countries. The Warrant is already in force in eight EU countries (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom). An initial hearing takes place before a judge within 48 hours merely to establish the identity of the arrested (habeus corpus) and whether the arrest warrant has been filled in correctly. Additional information from the state that issued the arrest warrant may be requested. The major difference between extradition and EAW procedures is that the “hearing” in the latter process does not consider the allegations against the defendant or examine evidence. Instead, the hearing is merely meant to satisfy the court that no “legal bars to surrender” apply.

The European Arrest Warrant was one of the main topics at the recent Counter-Jihad Summit in Vienna, where the former Austrian Ambassador Edgar K. Selzer gave a detailed talk on the implications of this new weapon against freedom of speech in the EU. Dr. Selzer pointed out that the inclusion of “racism and xenophobia” brings “an emotion, a sentiment” into the category of major crimes, such as murder, arson etc, which is a legal and logical absurdity.

The European Arrest Warrant does not define “racism and xenophobia” as such, but its drafters have relied on the European Commission’s “Framework Decision on combating racism and xenophobia” which criminalizes “belief in race colour, descent, religion or belief, national or ethnic origin as a factor determining aversion to individuals.” The Decision mandates that “racist and xenophobic behaviour must constitute an offence in all Member States and be punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties.” This framework decision will apply to all “offences” committed within the territory of the European Union, or “for the benefit of a legal person established in a Member State.”

The implications of all this are significant, for the future of civil liberties in the Western world no less than for me personally.

On May 11, I gave a speech at the Counter-Jihad Summit in Vienna. As our readers are well aware, “racism and xenophobia” in the EU-speak have long included the nebulous thought-crime of “Islamophobia”—and my speech could be construed as paradigmatically “Islamophobic” by the drafters of the EU Framework Decision, and accordingly acted upon by the future users of the European Arrest Warrant.

I am not an EU citizen, but that is immaterial if the “offence” was committed in an EU member-country. Once the European Arrest Warrant is in force, a Muslim-friendly judge in, say, Leicester or Birmingham could issue a warrant for my arrest in Greece—where I often go during the summer— for the “offence” committed by giving that speech in Austria last May, and the authorities in Thessaloniki or Athens would have to comply, no questions asked.

Furthermore, the speech was given at a gathering of 60 like-minded persons, most of them EU citizens. This constitutes a criminal conspiracy, a separate offense among those 32 crimes covered by the Warrant, since the Framework Decision defines a “racist or xenophobic group” as “a structured organisation consisting of at least two persons established for a specific period.” The speech was given to the Karl Martell Society, i.e. “for the benefit of a legal person established in a Member State.”

Last but not least, the said speech is widely available on the Internet, in both German and English, which potentially falls under the separate and as yet undefined offence of “computer crime.” Such EAWs have been issued already by British judges to Dutch authorities demanding the surrender of a Danish citizen in a case involving pornography.

Interestingly, under the Framework Decision, anything that is said at a John Randolph Club conference here in the United States may be deemed illegal and actionable under the European Arrest Warrant, if the offending speech or statement is posted on a website (such as www.chroniclesmagazine.org) that is downloadable within the EU, or if some supposedly “racist and xenophobic” material written by one of our editors or contributors is distributed by mailing Chronicles to a subscriber or an institution in the EU. This would be actionable under the Framework Decision as “public dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material containing expressions of racism and xenophobia,” potentially subjecting the author to arrest in any EU country on a warrant issued by a judge in any other EU country.

Orwell was prescient but his date was wrong, a quarter-century premature. Chronicles

Franskmændene har lavet dette logo, for at fejre deres snarlige formandsskab. Og måske også lidt præmaturt – Forfatning(straktaten)

I knew it, you knew it, we all knew it…

The French parliamentarians are considering eliminating that pesky amendment that makes a referendum on Turkey obligatory. Why? Well, because Turkey complained about the discriminatory wording of the text, as Yves Daoudal predicted and as I reported on a few days ago. Here is the latest:

Trifkovic, Fjordman og EUs kommende udleveringsregler

Jeg nævner kun dette læserbrev fordi det tilsyneladende er en gendrivelse af noget der her i blogverdenen ofte bliver omtalt som en kendsgerning: At det under kommende EU-lovgivning vil være muligt at udlevere egne borgere for lovovertrædelser i andre EU-lande, så f. eks. vi danske kunne blive udleveret for overtrædelse af drakonisk hate speech-lovgivning i Sverige eller andre steder. I en lidt fjernere fremtid måske endda til Tyrkiet, for ‘krænkelse’ af Muhammed.

HUGO PIETERSE skriver i sit indlæg Behold retsforbeholdet (29/5), at det vil være slut med ytringsfriheden i Danmark, hvis retsforbeholdet bliver afskaffet. […]

Den fælles arrestordre betyder egentlig bare, at det er lettere og hurtigere at få udleveret personer til retsforfølgelse på tværs af landegrænserne.

Hugo Pieterse kan være helt rolig.

Han må sige, hvad han vil om Holocaust i Danmark, uden at være bange for at blive udleveret til Østrig. Personen, som ønskes udleveret , skal nemlig have begået den kriminelle handling i det land, som ønsker at få ham/hende udleveret . Lasse Rune Hansen, medlem af Europabevægelsen: Ingen fare for udlevering

Fjordman skriver:

Not too many years into the future, we could face a situation where citizens of, say, Denmark could be arrested by their own authorities and handed over to be tried for “crimes against Islam” in one of the Arab “partner countries” of the EU. If this sounds unthinkable to you, look at the case of the Dutch cartoonist who was recently arrested by a dozen police officers for the crime of publishing cartoons insulting immigrants. The Execution of Britain

Jeg håber selvsagt at vores side tager fejl. Men selv hvis dette er tilfældet, hvor sikre kan vi være på at den nuværende udformning af reglerne ikke har indbygget mulighed for senere stramninger? (LFPC).

“Repressiv tolerance” i Norge – Frp tages lidt alvorligt, og så alligevel ikke

Det skyldes muligvis blot Informations vinkling, at dette studie af det norske Fremskrittspartiet præsenteres som banebrydende ved at tage udgangspunkt i deres vælgere, og ikke i bedrevidende (venstre)akademisk hovmod, men bemærk, at tilgangen stadig er patroniserende: De handler i protest mod pæne menneskers dæmonisering af dem (viljesløse og ansvarsfrie … den kender vi fra andre sammenhænge), og de er en restgruppe som moderniteten lod tilbage da toget kørte. Men små skridt af gangen. Næste gang kigger man måske på om f. eks. indvandringen virkeligt har medført samfundsmæssige problemer som Frp forholder sig til, ulig andre (LFPC).

I Danmark, Holland, Frankrig og Norge vinder de højrepopulistiske partier frem. For når -samfundseliten- beskriver de norske Fremskrittspartivælgere som fremmedfjendske, grådige, kolonihaveegoistiske grænsehandlende idioter, bærer de en del af skylden for, at en tredjedel af de norske vælgere flokkes om et parti som Fremskrittspartiet, mener journalist og forfatter Magnus Marsdal.

Kolonihaveegoistiske, fremmedfjendtlige, globaliseringsfornægtende, grådige, grænsehandlende ignoranter.

Har du, kære læser af denne foretrukne avis i den venstreintellektuelle kulturelite, nogensinde tænkt eller sagt noget i den stil om Dansk Folkeparti-vælgere?

For så er det blandt dig og dine – og ikke blandt DF’s vælgere – at smittekilden til den højrepopulistiske sygdom skal findes. Det mener Magnus Marsdal, norsk journalist og forfatter til bogen Frp-koden – Hemmeligheten bak Fremskrittspartiets suksess. […]

På den værdipolitiske akse har højrepopulisterne forstået at samle de ‘jævne folk’ op, som føler sig talt ned til af de gamle arbejderpartier, der de sidste 50 år i stigende grad har knyttet loyalitetsbånd til staten frem for arbejderklassen og rekrutteret ledere fra en uddannelseselite, der kun har foragt til overs for ‘jævne folks’ kultur. […]

“Venstrefløjen skal ikke rykke sig en millimeter på værdipolitiske spørgsmål om indvandring, køn og seksualitet. Når venstrepartier rykker til højre på de spørgsmål, rykker højrepartierne endnu længere. Afstanden mellem venstrefløjen og arbejderklassen rykker sig ikke, men det gør hele det værdipolitiske spektrum. De arbejderstemmer, som højrepopulisterne har været inde og hente bag socialdemokraternes frontlinje, er værdipolitisk reaktionære, men de går ikke så højt op i homo-ægteskaber, asyl og ligestilling, hvis venstrefløjen er klar på de krav, der samler bredt i arbejderklassen: krav om arbejdermagt og økonomisk omfordeling fra top til bund. For her er de markedsliberalistiske højrepopulister ikke arbejdernes ven – det er de bare gode til at skjule,” siger Magnus Marsdal, og tilføjer:

“Værdispørgsmål er vigtige. Men der står en elefant i rummet: øgende sociale forskelle i hele Europa. Øgende klasseskel under socialdemokratiske regeringer – det må venstrefløjen svare på.”

Magnus Marsdal: Frp-koden – Hemmeligheten bak Fremskritts-partiets suksess. Forlaget Manifest 2007Jo mere vi hader dem, jo stærkere bliver de

A special army unit should be formed to secure the North West’s airports and ports against illegal immigration and terrorism according to a Lancashire MP. “People would feel secure they would feel protected. “It’s not just about illegal immigration, it’s terrorism, gun running and drug smuggling. We would be able to crack down on all those things that people are concerned about on the street.” Army units ‘would secure ports’