»En almindelig familietragedie«

” Vi [Muslimernes Fællesråd ] mener ikke, at sådan en gerning på nogen måde kan tilskrives kultur eller Islam, men kun kan forklares med en kold afstumpethed, som vi på ingen måder kan være tjent med i noget samfund ” lyder det fra talsmand Zubair Butt Hussain i en kommentar om en familiehenrettelse i Pakistan på en 31-årig dansk statsborger med pakistanske rødder .

Kirsten Damgaard, kulturpsykolog og  En nær veninde til den 31-årige dræbte dansker i Pakistan siger, at drabet er en familietragedie. Ikke et æresdrab.

“Almindelig tragedie”, javist –  bare i den pakistanske  provins forekommer den 1000 gange om året ifølge P1. Det ualmindelige  er, at politiet overhovedet arresterer nogen. At Zubair Butt Hussain benægter koblingen mellem familiehenrettelser og islam/kultur vil givetvis være sød musik i manges ører, men denne afstandstagen rokker ikke ved – og nævner ikke med et ord – at religion og kultur af trosfæller til Butt Hussain bliver brugt til at legitimere denne praksis. For nogle år siden afslog Jordans parlament således at skærpe straffen for disse henrettelser fordi “Islamic hardliners, according to Al-Jazeera, “said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values.” Der kan også nævnes en artikel fra Yemen Times hvor der med udgangspunkt i Koranen blev argumenteret for at vold mod kvinder var en nødvendighed . Afstandstagen uden erkendelse af denne uenighed er derfor vildledning af godtroende kuffar. Der må kritisk selvransagelse til hos Zubair Butt Hussain og trosfæller, men dette falder jo traditionelt så umanerligt vanskeligt i disse kredse (Steen/LFPC).

 A Young Jew Is Savagely Beaten: Why are the Anti-Racists and the Mainstream Media Silent?

Sometimes, novels are prophetic. I am thinking of George Orwell and Jean Raspail who both imagined life in the late 20th and early 21st century. Raspail is the novelist who imagined that a dark-skinned barbarian horde would take over France. His work, The Camp of the Saints(1973) was originally condemned as “racist.” Slowly, over time, European government leaders began reading his novel and consulting with Raspail. I have written about his work before in my book, The Death of Feminism.

In January of 2006, Ilan Halimi was brutally tortured for three full weeks in Paris by gangs of African Muslim immigrant torturers. The media did not describe them as “Muslims,” but rather as “youth,” “militants,” “gang-members, “immigrants,” and “immigrants from Africa.” Neighbors took turns and joined in torturing Halimi. Other neighbors heard his screams and did nothing. Some came to watch. Halimi died on February 13, 2006. The ringleader of the gang, Youssouf Fofana fled to Ivory Coast in Africa but was extradited back to France. He and 18 others are facing a trial in his torture and murder. American expatriate journalist, Nidra Poller, has written about this horrific case.

Now, a visibly Jewish, kipah-wearing 17 year-old, Rudy Haddad, walking in a Jewish quarter, was set upon by 15-30 “African immigrants.” No one is saying whether they are Muslims or not. Alright, Martians from Africa beat Haddad with iron bars and fractured his skull. Haddad, like Halimi, and like their attackers, are also of African or possibly Arab descent–as was Sebastien Selam who was murdered in Paris in 2003. Haddad has just come out of a medically induced coma. According to a Jewish Telegraphic Agency report:

“While French officials were quick to condemn the attack, most fell short of identifying the crime as anti-Semitic, saying the police first needed to complete their ongoing investigation. French President Nicolas Sarkozy told reporters while visiting Israel this week that he was “particularly shocked by what happened to a young French boy, on the pretext that he was wearing a kipah,” the AFP news agency reported. In an initial presidential statement Sunday, Sarkozy denounced the attack but did not draw such conclusions.”

However, various representatives of the French Jewish community have denounced this horrific crime as “anti-Semitic” which, when last I checked, is also considered a form of racism.

So, where are all the anti-racists now? I hear no condemnations. The silence is chilling. And all too predictable. Where are the mainstream media? Where is FOX, CNN, MSNBC, and the International Herald Tribune? (Only ABC ran a Reuters’ 190 word story earlier today). When I googled this story, the first three pages consisted of stories filed by small bloggers and mainly by Jewish and Israeli media. (Military Photos carried a story as well). But where are The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times? For heaven’s sake: Where is Le Soir, Le Monde, and Figaro? Has France’s Channel 2 covered this?

Arguably, Channel 2 bears a great responsibility here for that is the channel that broadcast the fake murder of Mohammed al-Dura and that sued for defamation when Philippe Karsenty described the coverage as a hoax. As we all know, the French Court found that Karsenty’s criticism was not “libelous.” Charles Enderlin, of Channel 2, has vowed to appeal this decision and has gotten 300 of his journalist-buddies to form a circle of support for him.

I think that Haddad’s grieving family and the Chabad community (to which Haddad was apparently connected since he was on his way to pray at the Beth Chaya Mouchka Lubavitch synagogue), might explore a lawsuit (or at least a demonstration) against the state-owned Channel 2 and against Enderlin. If you think this is a far-fetched suggestion, please consider the other options.

Indeed, what is to be done? Do Jews world-wide, beginning in Europe, and particularly in the 19th arondissement in Paris, need Israeli Defense Forces to guard them as they walk to Parisian synagogues?

Do French police officers need to guard individual Jews just as they have been forced to guard each and every synagogue and Jewish Center ever since Palestinian terrorist leader Yaser Arafat began his murderous campaign in the late 1960s of airplane hijackings, hostage taking, and synagogue and airport bombings, etc.?

Shall the remnant of Jewish life in Europe wearily pick itself up and leave, either to Israel, Australia, or America which is still the last country standing? Will Jewish-Israeli expatriates to Germany actually leave?

Will Europe finally consider not allowing any further immigration of African or Arab Martians? Will Europe finally dare to consider outlawing radical and unevolved Islam as a criminal enterprise?

How about deportation then?

Or must France, and for that matter, all Europe, start deporting African and/or Muslim immigrants? (Oh I can just hear the civil libertarians shutting down their minds. Even I’m slightly queasy about this suggestion). Or must France consider deporting only African and/or Muslim immigrant gang-members? (What if a gang member reforms and is rehabilitated and we deport him back to a country which practices torture and kidnaps young children as soldiers in their barbarian armies?) Well then, how about deporting African Muslim immigrant gang members who have previously been convicted of violent crimes? (But you can’t hold someone’s past against them, it may not predict their future, they may turn over a new leaf, etc.) Alright, then. What is the magic formula that will allow Europeans to act against the barbarians in their midst without having to live with something that is worse than barbarism, namely, that most-dreaded of accusations: “Racism?”

Clearly, Europe is willing to sacrifice its Jews to African immigrant and/or to Muslim barbarism. Will it prove willing to allow secularists or Christians to also be sacrificed to barbarism as well?

Phyllis Chesler     

MUSLIMS WHO CRUSHED JEWISH BOY WERE SCREAMING”DIRTY JEW!”        En kippa kan betyde døden