22
jan
Seneste opdatering: 6/8-09 kl. 1605
26 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

Wilders om Hollands juridiske galehus. Interview fra 22. januar tekstet pÄ tysk:

En tredje og mĂ„ske endnu mere prekĂŠr konsekvens, hvis Wilders kendes skyldig, men fortsĂŠtter med at udtrykke sin modstand mod politisk islam, kan blive, at det officielle Holland med sin sĂŠrprĂŠgede sans for retfĂŠrdighed annullerer politibeskyttelsen af ham og fratager ham de bodyguards, der i dag vĂ„ger over hans liv. Sker det, sĂ„ er Wilders naturligvis et meget nemmere offer, og han vil risikere at ende sine dage pĂ„ samme mĂ„de som Theo van Gogh. Michael Jalving , Ezra Levant : Holland’s national suicide note, Silencing Islam’s Critics , A Dutch court imports Saudi blasphemy norms to Holland

Wilders risikerer to Ă„rs fĂŠngsel. I Østrig er politikeren og juristen Susanne Winter netop blevet idĂžmt 24.000 Euro (178.855 DKK) for det samme Wilders nu skal anklages for. Østrigske aviser kalder dommen en “skandale“.FPÖ-Winter schuldig gesprochen, Austrian legislator convicted of anti-Muslim incitement. Winther foud guilty. Norge er pĂ„ samme foruroligende kurs: Forsvarer ytringsfrihet mot ny blasfemi-lov.I Sverige er HMF bĂžderne sĂ„ drakoniske, at de fĂŠrreste vover at fremfĂžre synspunkter, der ikke er blĂ„stemplede. Og da slet ikke parlamentarikere. I den mere glĂŠdelige afdeling, ser vi at hollandske liberale har forelsket sig  i dansk fremmedpolitik.

Trusler

DET er nok almindeligt at have identitetsspĂžrgsmĂ„l, nĂ„r man er 15 et halvt Ă„r. Men som dansk-israeler, stĂ„r man ogsĂ„ med et nationalitetsspĂžrgsmĂ„l. DesvĂŠrre er det ikke alt ved min identitet, der er frivilligt og op til mig. Mine forĂŠldre har altid rĂ„det mig til at gĂ„ stille med dĂžrene, og som lille forstod jeg det ikke. Hvorfor mĂ„tte venner med anden etnisk baggrund snakke lĂžs om deres nationalitet? Gradvis blev jeg klogere. Jeg forstod, at mange mennesker har noget imod israelere, og nogle direkte hader dem. Hizb-ut-Tahrir har sĂ„gar lavet en liste over jĂžder, der skal drĂŠbes. Dog troede jeg aldrig helt, at disse personer mente det, nĂ„r de gav udtryk for, at jĂžder var roden til alt ondt. At de mener det, gik dels op for mig nytĂ„rsdag ’08, hvor min bedstemor i Israel fortalte, at to israelere var blevet skudt i Odense, dels fordi jeg pĂ„ det seneste har mĂ„ttet vĂŠnne mig til trusler alene pĂ„ grund af min nationalitet. Jeg har ligefrem fĂ„et at vide, at der var et tĂŠskehold efter mig. Det er absurd, at folk, der fl ygter fra forfĂžlgelse, selv vĂŠlger at udsĂŠtte andre for det. Navnlig i et land som Danmark, hvor samfundet bygger pĂ„, at der skal vĂŠre plads til alle, og uenighed udtrykkes via diskussion. Nogle retfĂŠrdiggĂžr det med, at Israel laver en masse lort, og til det er der kun at svare: ja, det gĂžr de! Og det er meget komplekst og de er ikke alene! Kina, Rusland, en rĂŠkke arabiske lande etcetera er langt mere brutale, men ingen af disse borgere mĂ„ skjule deres nationalitet af hensyn til deres sikkerhed. Skal vi bare acceptere, at det er nĂždvendigt, at der stĂ„r adskillige politibetjente foran synagogen i Krystalgade, fordi nogle mennesker ikke respekterer et helt folkeslag pĂ„ grund af et omrĂ„de, der er mindre end Jylland? WA oplyser kun skribentens fornavn, fordi hans forĂŠldre Ăžnsker at beskytte ham mod flere trusler. Jonathan, Weekendavisen, ikke online

En svensk pionjÀrgÀrning

Jamen, tillykke sÄ, Sverige

Cherin Awad har goda chanser att bli den första svenska advokat som jobbar i slöja. I mÄndags började hon sin pionjÀrgÀrning pÄ en advokatbyrÄ i Stockholm. Cherin Awad Àr hittills mest kÀnd för att hon vÀgrade skaka hand med Carl Hamilton i Halal-tv pÄ SVT. Det tycker hon Àr synd. För henne som troende muslim Àr det sjÀlvklart att inte röra vid personer av motsatt kön.

– Hittills har jag fĂ„tt uteslutande positiva reaktioner. Jag tror inte att min religion kommer att begrĂ€nsa mitt urval av klienter. För mig Ă€r det viktigt att visa att muslimska kvinnor ocksĂ„ kan och uppmuntra andra att ge sig in pĂ„ banor de kanske inte tĂ€nkt sig, sĂ€ger hon. Hennes chef tycker det Ă€r sjĂ€lvklart att respektera andra religioners vanor och att det Ă€r viktigt att bejaka mĂ„ngfaldskulturen. Hon kan bli första advokaten i slöja

Bruce Bawer: A Norwegian Thatcher?

These days nearly every Western European country has at least one of them – a large political party that’s held at arm’s length by the media, political establishment, academia and the chattering classes. Some of these black sheep – such as the British National Party, Jean-Marie Le Pen’s National Front and the late Jorg Haider’s crew in Austria – really are beyond the pale; others are demonized simply because they challenge statist dogma and/or speak forbidden truths about Islamic immigration.

In Scandinavia, the home of statism at its statiest, the most high-profile such entity is probably Pia Kjaersgaard’s Danish People’s Party. Two months after 9/11, voter anxiety about Islamization swept out the Social Democrats (in power since 1924) and installed a conservative coalition – which, with strong DPP support, has since instituted effective, and popular, reforms (and stood foursquare for free speech during the cartoon crisis).

The picture in Sweden is different: Although the 2006 election exchanged Goran Persson’s long-dominant Social Democrats for a “moderate” coalition, systemic changes have been modest, and the only major critics of the Swedes’ essentially unmodified “see-no-evil” immigration policy have been the Sweden Democrats – a group, alas, that has a history of neo-Nazi ties and anti-Semitic rhetoric (and, in any case, has yet to win a single Riksdag seat). Interview: Jerusalem Post

Det forbudte P-ord, og de straffrie trusler

7332181013580Jeg bruger normalt ikke p-ordet, det er vitterligt racistisk, og det slÄr sageslÞse indvandrergrupper sammen med de problemvoldere det er tiltÊnkt at ramme, men de tider hvor jeg forargedes og satte folk i bÄs pÄ grund af brug af ordet er forlÊngst forbi. Fronterne i kulturkrigen, og den politiske korrekthed der forsÞges holdt i live, affÞder en modreaktion sÄ nogle af os bliver i bedste fald ligeglade med pÊnhedens grÊnser, i visse tilfÊlde fÄr lyst til at overskride dem. Den pÄgÊldende betjent har forbrudt sig lige prÊcis seks bogstaver plus tilhÞrende slette associationer, men hvis der, hvad alt tyder pÄ, ikke bliver rejst nogen form for tiltale mod de tilvandrede arabere der pÄ RÄdhuspladsen i KÞbenhavn forrige lÞrdag gav udtryk for folkemorderiske Þnsker mod en fredelig gruppe danskere, ja, sÄ er min forargelse her helt og aldeles pÄ den udhÊngte betjents vegne (LFPC).

PolitidirektĂžren for KĂžbenhavn indberetter en betjents racistiske sprogbrug for Statsadvokaten. Episoden, som er dokumenteret pĂ„ video af Modkraft, udspillede sig forrige tirsdag til en Gaza-demonstration og gik ud over en danskpalĂŠstinenser, som fik beskeden »Nu sĂŠtter du dig ned, ellers sĂŠtter jeg dig ned med magt. Kan du fatte det, perker?«. »Jeg har oprettet en sag pĂ„ den, og den er jeg ved at sende til Statsadvokaten for at bede ham foretage en undersĂžgelse og en vurdering«, siger politidirektĂžr Hanne Bech Hansen. […]

Hun vil ikke kommentere den konkrete sag, fordi den nu efterforskes, men direkte adspurgt om, hvorvidt ordet ‘perker’ nogensinde kan vĂŠre acceptabelt for en betjent at sige, er svaret klart. »Det er entydigt forkert at bruge det ord i mine Ăžrer. Men det mĂ„ statsadvokaten jo nu tage stilling til«, siger Hanne Bech Hansen. Hanne Bech Hansen understreger, at fordomsfulde bemĂŠrkninger efter hendes bedste overbevisning ikke er et stort problem. »Jeg hĂžrer ikke om det i foruroligende grad«, siger hun uden at kunne oplyse, hvor ofte problemstillingen dukker op. […] PolitidirektĂžr: Betjente mĂ„ ikke sige ‘perker’

Wilders: »I will not stand trial alone«

“but also with the hundreds of thousands of Dutch people who reject the Islamization of The Netherlands.”

Defend Geert Wilders and Freedom of Speech

The International Free Press Society
January 22, 2009 – Washington, DC and Copenhagen, Denmark:

A Dutch court yesterday ordered the criminal prosecution of Geert Wilders, Dutch parliamentarian and leader of the Freedom Party (PVV), for his statements – written, spoken and filmed -regarding Islam. The Amsterdam Court of Appeals has deemed such statements “insulting,” declaring that they “substantially harm the religious esteem” of Muslims.
Clearly, the effect of this Dutch court order is to set new limits to public debate in Dutch society, in this case about the highly controversial but nonetheless crucially important subject of Islam. This makes the prosecution of Geert Wilders an unacceptable breach of the sanctity of freedom of speech in Western society.

Having ordered a criminal prosecution for the opinions of a duly elected leader of a legitimate political party, Dutch authorities have dealt a devastating blow to political expression. While Dutch prosecutors prepare their indictment and Geert Wilders’ future hangs in limbo, who in The Netherlands will dare discuss political and cultural matters related to Islam – Islamic law, Islamic integration, Islamic crime, Islamic policy – openly, freely and fearlessly? The chilling effect is instantaneous. If, indeed, Wilders is ultimately convicted, free speech will cease to exist in the heart of Europe.
The International Free Press Society believes this court-ordered prosecution against Geert Wilders, a central figure in the fight against the Islamization of the West, amounts to a dangerous concession to the strictures of Islamic law, which prohibits all criticism of Islam, over Western traditions of, and rights to robust and unfettered debate. As such, it is tantamount to a surrender to totalitarian influences that undermine all Western freedoms. And as such, it must be resisted.
It is important to recall recent history. Two Dutchmen, Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh, have been murdered for their outspoken opposition to Islamization in The Netherlands. Another Dutch politician, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, has been infamously forced into exile. Wilders alone now carries this debate over Islam in Dutch society forward – forcefully but logically, outspokenly but reasonably, and always peacefully. In order to do so, this member of Dutch parliament lives in a virtual prison, consigned to 24-hour guard by Islamic death threats against his life. Now, Dutch authorities have ordered him to be prosecuted for the Orwellian crime of committing “insulting” words.
As Wilders puts it, “If I have to stand trial, I will not stand trial alone, but also with the hundreds of thousands of Dutch people who reject the Islamization of The Netherlands.” He will also stand trial with those in The Netherlands and beyond who reject government prosecutions of free speech. In recognition of this this dire situation, the IFPS immediately calls on every supporter of free speech to come to the aid of Geert Wilders.To assist in this effort, the IFPS has launched an international campaign in defense of Geert Wilders and his freedom of speech.
To support these efforts, we urge you to contribute to the Geert Wilders Defense Fund. Donation information can be found at the IFPS website.
We also urge defenders of free speech to sign this letter of protest against the Dutch Government
www.petitiononline.com/wilders/petition.html

Lars Hedegaard
President of the IFPS
lhedegaard@freepressmonitor.com
Diana West
Vice President
dwest@freepressmonitor.com
* * *
The International Free Press Society was established on January 1, 2009.
Read our Policy Statement here
http://www.sappho.dk/the-international-free-press-society-policy-statement.htm
The IFPS Board of Advisors

Asger Aamund
Bat Ye’or
Stephen Coughlin
Rachel Ehrenfeld
David Harris
Ole Hasselbalch
Hans Jansen
Ehsan Jami
Ibn Warraq
Philippe Karsenty
Roger Kimball
Ezra Levant
Andrew C. McCarthy
Nidra Poller
Kathy Shaidle
Roger Scruton
Robert Spencer
Mark Steyn
Allen West
Geert Wilders
The IFPS Board of Directors
Lars Hedegaard, President
Diana West, Vice President
Christine Brim. Secretary
Bjorn Larsen, Treasurer
Edward May, Outreach Coordinator
Paul Belien, Sergeant at Arms

Dutch politician faces charges over anti-Islam film

Ezra Levant: Holland’s national suicide note

The War on Wilders
By Jacob Laksin
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, January 22, 2009

Geert Wilders has long been a thorn in the side of Holland’s politically correct powers that be. In an era of rigid multiculturalism, the gadfly politician has persisted in asking uncomfortable questions about the compatibility of Islamic mores and European values – an often-lonely campaign that has earned him death threats from Muslim fanatics and the disdain of the Dutch political class, media, and civil authorities. But rather than challenge Wilders in the court of public opinion, the Dutch establishment has decided to put him on trial.

This Wednesday the Dutch Court of Appeals in Amsterdam ordered a criminal prosecution of Wilders on charges of “incitement and hatred and discrimination.” His specific crime: statements that he has made about “Muslims and their belief.” Citing Wilders’s comparisons of Islam with Nazism, the Court of Appeals claims that criminal prosecution is the “obvious” response to this allegedly intolerable insult.

To understand just how outrageous is the court’s order it is necessary to consider the substance, such as it is, of the charges against Wilders. It does not exaggerate the case to say that Wilders is being accused of nothing more than holding an opinion with which the court’s judges disagree. (One cannot call it an unpopular opinion since, if recent polling is any guide, majorities of the Dutch public share Wilders’s apprehensions about Islam and Muslims’ ability to assimilate.) Thus, the court cites Wilders’s “insulting statements” and complains that his “presentation is characterized by biased, strongly generalizing [sic] phrasings with a radical meaning, ongoing reiteration and an increasing intensity.” In fact, the only truly “radical” idea is the notion that having a “biased” opinion, even one that some consider “insulting,” constitutes a crime. According to this absurdly open-ended standard, any Dutch citizen who has ever expressed an opinion has potentially committed a crime. “Apparently this is the Netherlands today,” Wilders darkly observed yesterday. “If you speak out you might be prosecuted. To participate in public debate has become a dangerous activity.”

Indeed, it may be even worse than that. In effect, Wilders is being prosecuted for stating the obvious. It is telling that in deploring his comparison of Islamic extremism to Nazism, the court pointedly omits to mention that Wilders has produced ample evidence for the charge. In Fitna, his March 2008 film about Islamic radicalism, Wilders included images of Muslim demonstrators wielding placards declaring “God bless Hitler,” calling for “another Holocaust” and paying tribute to Adolf Hitler. In another scene from the film, a 3-year-old girl is seen reciting Koranic verses calling Jews “apes and swine.” When Wilders likens the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf – yet another criminal offense, according to the Dutch court – it is this observable context that he has in mind.

But one need not take Wilders’s “biased” word for it. As even the most casual news reader would have noticed, pro-Nazi imagery and anti-Semitic incitement have become a staple of Muslim demonstrations across the world. At a January 2001 rally for Hamas and Hezbollah in Amsterdam, Muslim protestors shouted what has become a familiar slogan in the Netherlands: “Hamas, Hamas, Joden aan het gas” (Hamas, Hamas, all Jews to the gas). In Copenhagen, Denmark, earlier this month, Muslim demonstrators’ chants of “Alla-hu Akbar!” were punctuated with “Heil Hilter!” salutes and calls for the deaths of Jews. Similar examples are legion. When a prominent Dutch lawyer praised the court’s decision this week as “a happy day for all followers of Islam who do not want to be tossed on the garbage dump of Nazism,” he missed the point entirely. No one has done more to make Wilders’s parallels between Nazism and Islam plausible than Muslims themselves.

What makes the legal war on Wilders all the more stunning is that the court seems in part to agree with the thrust of his arguments. Allowing that immigration and integration are valid subjects for debate, the court noted in its decision this week that “Islamic immigrants may be expected to have consideration for the existing sentiments in the Netherlands as regards their belief, which is partly at odds with Dutch and European values and norms.” This of course is the very point that Wilders’ has been making all along, if in a more provocative fashion. Supposing that some will find it “insulting,” what is to stop Dutch magistrates from being brought to trial on the basis of their own court orders? As Wilders points out, “If I have to appear in court, not only I will be prosecuted, but also hundreds of thousands of Dutch citizens who reject the Islamisation of the West.”

The travesty of the Dutch court’s decision goes beyond the Orwellian illogic of its reasoning. While only Wilders will be prosecuted, at least for the moment, the court’s decision is really an attack on his rebel Freedom Party (PVV), which holds nine seats in the 150-seat Dutch lower house of parliament. The expected legal fees – and the prospect of years of dragged-out litigation – could prove fatal to the PVV. “We depend on small donations,” Wilders points out. “The Freedom Party is the only party in Parliament that does not accept any government funding. This court decision jeopardizes the very existence of the Freedom Party. We simply cannot afford the enormous legal expenses.”

This is not the first time that Wilders has found himself in legal trouble. In June 2008, a Jordanian prosecutor charged Wilders with “blasphemy and contempt of Muslims” and ordered him to stand trial in the country. Just a few days later, Wilders was cleared of similar charges in his native country by the Dutch public prosecutor’s office, which ruled that Wilders’s views of Islam should be considered part of a legitimate debate on Islam in Dutch society and that the he had committed no criminal offense. “Thankfully, our legal system is still not like that of Jordan,” Wilders observed at the time. He may have spoken too soon.
From a free-speech perspective, 2008 proved a disappointing year. While Wilders battled with the courts in the Netherlands, the writer Mark Steyn went on trial for “Islamophobia” in Canada. As in Wilders’s case, the fact that Steyn’s most “Islamophobic” writings were direct quotations from Muslims was deemed immaterial. Like Wilders, too, Steyn ultimately prevailed, but the state of free expression in the West was tarnished. With Geert Wilders in the dock, 2009 is shaping up to be another banner year for the self-appointed censors of debate.

0 0 vote
Article Rating


DonĂ©r engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

26 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Magga
Magga
12 years ago

Jeg ved det godt, hr. Broe. 🙂

Whodares
12 years ago

FalkeĂžje. Man bĂžr gĂžre langt mere end det, for jeg har en grum fornemmelse af at dette bare er en prĂžveballon for EUrabias levebrĂždspolitikere. I dag Holland i morgen Danmark, I dag Wilders i morgen Urias-Kim, Steen,LFCP dig og mig. Ser i slet ikke hvad der er ved at ske ? SĂ„dan en anden lille skrĂŠkvision, nogle hysteriske lĂŠger (bla Vibeke Manniche) anbefaler nu helt seriĂžst at vore politikere forbyder folk at ryge i eget hjem (og lur mig om det ikke kommer uanset hvilken side de tossede politikere kommer fra) man taler om problemet med at overvĂŠgtige kvinder fĂ„r… Read more »

Ivan Broe
Ivan Broe
12 years ago

Jeg tror ikke, at den hollandske regering slipper godt fra det her. En bÄde transatlantisk og transpacific forstÄelse er ved at blive smedet nu. Og jeg kan stadig forsikre:

Vi gÄr ikke ned i tavshed. Vi underkaster os ikke radikal Islam. Vi opgiver ikke vores frihed, vores ret til at udtrykke vores meninger uden en dÞdeliug kamp mod de mÞrke krÊfter, der truer vores eksistens, VÊr sikker pÄ det

falkeĂžje
falkeĂžje
12 years ago

Danskere og alle andre nĂžgterne europĂŠiske folk bĂžr reagere med en boycot af alle hollandske varer, hvis Wilders dĂžmmes.

falkeĂžje

Magga
Magga
12 years ago

Alt for dĂ„rligt, Bruce Bawer Det krĂŠver en del at fĂžlge med i, hvad der sker i vor verden i disse Ă„r, man mĂ„ vĂŠlge, og mon ikke vi er mange, der hele tiden er bagud med lĂŠsningen. For mit vedkommende gjaldt det Bruce Bawers bĂžger, og nu er de forelĂžbig rĂžget helt ud ad listen. For det ligner ikke noget at slĂ„ sig op pĂ„ samfundsanalytiske emner og sĂ„ vĂŠre for doven til at sĂŠtte sig ind i det, man skriver om. Bawer har boet mange Ă„r i Skandinavien, og hvis han virkelig var interesseret i forholdene, ville han… Read more »

Janne
Janne
12 years ago

Og sÄ laves der forresten ogsÄ ord jerntÊpper i og med at der er nogle ord der nu kun mÄ bruges af bestemte borgere. F.eks. det modbydelige ord perker.

Janne
Janne
12 years ago

Der skabes jerntĂŠpper en masse i Ăžjeblikket. Ved hjĂŠlp af religiĂžs intolerance og fordomme. Religions jerntĂŠpper skabes med halal og sharia regler i offentlige institutioner. KĂžns jerntĂŠpper i offentligt regi skabes ved hjĂŠlp af accept af religiĂžse kvinder der nĂŠgter at give hĂ„nd til mĂŠnd (det skulle lige vĂŠre danske mĂŠnd der nĂŠgtede at give hĂ„nd til kvinder…) og nĂŠgter at vĂŠre alene i samme rum som mĂŠnd eller at sv’Ăžmme i svĂžmmehaller hvor mĂŠnd ogsĂ„ er til stede. KĂžns jerntĂŠpper skabes via rigide religiĂžse pĂ„bud til kvinder om at bĂŠre tĂžrklĂŠde pĂ„ job og i skole. PĂŠdagoger laver kĂžns… Read more »

JensH
JensH
12 years ago

jdm

Du har ret. Bruce Bawer er ikke sÊrlig godt orienteret om Danske forhold nÄr han skriver:

“anxiety about Islamization swept out the Social Democrats (in power since 1924)”

Der har vĂŠret adskellige borgerlige regeringer siden 1924. Jeg kan her liste dem med statsministerens navn i parentes:

1926-29 (Madsen-Mygdal, Venstre)
1945-47 (Knud Kristen, Venstre)
1950-53 (Erik Eriksen, Venstre)
1968-71 (Hilmar BaunsgÄrd, Radikal -> VKR-regeringen)
1973-75 (Poul Hartling, Venstre)
1982-93 (Poul SchlĂŒter, Konservativ)

Der har sÄledes siden 1924 vÊret borgerlig regering i omtrent 22-23, (mere end to Ärtier tilsammen), Är fÞr Anders Foghs Rasmussens VK-regering tog over i november 2001.

Anna Lyttiger
12 years ago

Zonka: Ja, jeg synes ogsĂ„ at det var grimt og diskriminerende at sige “perker”. Hvorfor kunne han ikke bare have sagt “rĂžvhul”? SĂ„ var han sluppet for al balladen.

Johansen
Johansen
12 years ago

“För henne som troende muslim Ă€r det sjĂ€lvklart att inte röra vid personer av motsatt kön. ”

Godt man ikke lider af samme kropsforskrékkelse. 🙂

Gad vide hvor mange klienter hun fĂ„r, nĂ„r man ikke engang kan give et hĂ„ndtryk til sin advokat? Jeg mener engang at have lĂŠst udtrykket “hor med hĂ„nden” om hĂ„ndtrykket ud fra en islamisk synsvinkel.
Hun afviser ligesom Asmaa den sekulĂŠre omgangsform – hĂ„ndtrykket. Hvad laver sĂ„danne personer egentlig i sekulĂŠre samfund, nĂ„r vores normer og sĂŠdvaner byder dem imod?

Ulla
Ulla
12 years ago

SelvfĂžlgelig mĂ„ betjenten ikke sige perker. Han mĂ„ heller ikke sige “din dumme kĂŠlling” til mig. Men helt ĂŠrligt: nĂ„r lĂŠger begĂ„r alvorlige fejl, der koster folk liv eller fĂžrlighed, betragter vi det som hĂŠndelige uheld, og ofte med rette. Betjenten skal bare have besked pĂ„ ikke at gĂžre det igen. Faktisk har jeg lige vĂŠret ude at trĂŠne med politiet – jeg var figurant, klĂŠdt ud som autonom og udstyret med “brosten” af skumgummi. Vi blev ikke bedt om at sĂŠtte os ned TO gange eller individuelt, vi blev “sat” ganske brutalt, hvis vi ikke gjorde det straks efter… Read more »

jdm
jdm
12 years ago

Undskyld, 1982 i Danmark ikke Sverige.

li
li
12 years ago

Tja,om den nu forfulgte politimand havde sagt idiot istedet for perker, havde nok ikke hjulpet ham, for sĂ„ ville “idiot” straks blive gjort til en race! og dermed ville politimanden alligevel vĂŠre blevet til racist!

Zonka
12 years ago

SelvfÞlgelig mÄ politiet ikke sige perker, og for eftertiden bliver fÞlgende sÊtning standardpensum pÄ politiskolen:

»Nu sÊtter De dem ned, i modsat fald vil jeg blive tvunget til at gentage dette i et hÞjere toneleje. Er dette forstÄet, eller skal jeg tilkalde politiets multi-etniske tolkeservice?«

Magnus
Magnus
12 years ago
jdm
jdm
12 years ago

Interviewet med Bawer. Var det ikke i 1982, at Socialdemokratiet tabte valget og de Konservative fik regeringsmagten?

Janne
Janne
12 years ago

Hvis Wilders ikke mÄ citere fra koranen, hvorfor mÄ der sÄ citeres fra koranen i moskeer?

Hvis Wilder krĂŠnker nogen, gĂžr det der siges i moskeer vel ogsĂ„ sĂ„, eller…? Det krĂŠnker i hvert fald mig det der stĂ„r i koranen at der skal gĂžres mod ikke-troende og anderledes troende. KrĂŠnker mig dybt.

Ja, det er absurd det der sker lige nu i Holland.

Jutta
Jutta
12 years ago


Ja, de radikale har jo altid besluttet mod borgere. Nej, danskheden kunne ikke blive udsletted fra Flensborg. Du ved da, at Nordtyskere gerne sender deres börn paa dansk skole? Ikke kun i Flensborg?
Og tak for sangen ” Det haver saa nylingen regnet”

Jeg haaber bare, at alle, der vil kaempe for vores frihed in Europa, vil komme sammen – i alle europaeiske lande!
Det er skam ikke saa let.

Jutta
Jutta
12 years ago


Ja, jeg haenger ogsaa paa tiden. Jeg har som tysker laert skoledansk paa den dejlige skole in Flensburg, Duborgskolen,det er langt tid siden.
Nu tar det alt for langt tid at oversaette .
Men jeg elsker Danmark og Europa (ikke EU) og hvis ingen kan oversaette det, saa skal jeg nok goere det, fordi det er vigtig.

Mine fem börn elsker ogsaa Danmark – vi elsker Fanö, og en datter vil demnĂ€chst da arbejde i Esbjerg kommune som Muski-pĂ€dagog (Violin og piano). Hun laerer flittig dansk sammen med min mand.

Jutta
Jutta
12 years ago

Er det muligt, at du kan oversaette det fra den störste politically incorrect Blog fra Tyskland? #45 Alster (22. Jan 2009 20:56) Sind wir in Europa noch weit weg vom “HeimtĂŒckegesetz” im Dritten Reich? Karl KĂŒpper war ein BĂŒttenredner (Kölner Karneval), der u.a. mal auf die BĂŒhne ging, den rechten Arm hob und zur Überraschung des Publikums sagte,” so hoch liegt bei uns der Dreck im Keller!”. Obwohl populĂ€r, ereilte ihn im Jahre 1939 ein Redeverbot nach dem “HeimtĂŒckegesetz” wegen VerĂ€chtlichmachung des deutschen Grußes, sowie von NS-WĂŒrdentrĂ€gern und -Organisationen. Wenn man die NS-Ideologie mit der Polit-Ideologie Islam in etwa gleichsetzt(… Read more »

Magga
Magga
12 years ago

Nej, Wilders har ikke gjort noget, udover at han har fremvist nogle kendsgerninger pĂ„ en lille film, der kun varer fĂ„ minutter. Han har ladet muslimer og uddrag fra deres hellige skrifter tale for sig selv. Dette bliver et alvorligt vendepunkt, hvilken vej det end gĂ„r. Og flere af disse sager vil falde tĂŠt i de kommende Ă„r, er jeg alvorligt bange for. Durban II vil ligelede an give en strĂžmretning. Men vi stĂ„r i det hele taget overfor mange opgĂžr. Jeg har ikke glemt Anders Foghs hĂ„nlige benĂŠgtelse, da han blev spurgt om han havde set Fitna. Der er… Read more »

Robin_Shadowes
Robin_Shadowes
12 years ago

Jag skrev under petitionen igÄr. Imponerande att dom redan fÄtt ihop sÄ mÄnga. Wilders Àr vÀl vÀrd att stödja. Han Àr en modig hjÀlte tillsammans med Hedegaard, Hirsan Ali och mÄnga fler.

Anne Marie Buch
Anne Marie Buch
12 years ago

Det her er simpelthen surrealistisk. Han har jo ikke gjort noget!?