Man tror det er plottet fra en dårlig, såkaldt samfundskritisk* svensk krimi, men virkeligheden er mere karikeret end fiktionen:

I samband med rättegången mot de tre flickor som angripit Martin Kinnunen och hans flickvän i går på Södertörns tingsrätt så uppträdde mamman till den huvudåtalade extremt olämpligt. Den huvudåtalade heter Rebecka Roos, hennes mamma heter Cecilia Roos och är ” Professor i dansinterpretation”, vad nu det är. Bekanta till mig vittnar om att Cecilia Roos skrattade under i princip hela rättegången, samma rättegång där hennes dotter står anklagad för att ha slagit ned en kvinna samt sparkat henne när hon låg ned. Dessutom så gick Cecilia Roos, enligt samma vittnen, upp på åhörarläkaren och hälsade vänligt på medlemmarna i ”Revolutionär front” som satt där. – Det verkar som om ungdomarna i Revolutionär Front vann. Kinnunen överväger att trappa ned sin politiska verksamhet efter den grova misshandlen. Robsten blog.

* Beskrivelsen grunder sig selvfølgelig på, at de alle er i overensstemmelse med den herskende ideologi. Såvel Mankell som Gouillou, Liza Marklund og Stieg Larsson befinder sig fra socialdemokratiet  og venstreud, og skriver  i strid, politisk medvind. Ligesom også Sjöval og Wahlöö gjorde. Det eneste de risikerer for deres “samfundskritik”, er masser af penge, kors og bånd og  stjerner.

Det tyrkiske mareridtsscenarie

Det er vanskeligt at undgå velkendte klicheer om kulturelt selvhad og et dødsønske hos de europæiske eliter. Konsekvenserne af Tyrkiet i EU vil være fatale for Europa, og de samme eliter kan umuligt være så blinde og uvidende at de ikke kan lave den slags fremskrivninger som den anmeldte bog her opstiller (LFPC).

[…] The sheer size of Turkey brings another negative issue to the EU table. At almost 800,000 square kilometres she dwarfs Germany, the EU’s present largest country by over twice the area and almost matches her population numbers as well. Turkey currently has 71 million inhabitants compared to Germany’s 82 million, but Turkey is expected to expand to 100 million by 2050, whilst Germany, although not actually shrinking, will only grow courtesy of non-indigenous immigrants, the majority of whom just happen to Turkish.

This is of particular importance apropos the number of delegates any European country can send to the European parliament. The larger one’s population, the larger the number of delegates, thus the Europe of 2025 could find itself in the curious situation where an Islamic country is allowed to wield the most powerful bloc vote in Brussels’ European parliament, which itself sits in a city with a majority Islamic population. […]

They quote EU officials who believe only 2.7 million Turks will move to Europe, the same EU officials no doubt who thought only 17 thousand Poles would come to England, rather than the 2 million who of course did just that. […]

The EU officials’ figure of a mere 2.7 million immigrants is laughable. Germany alone may take that number in a matter of months, the rest of Europe possibly ten times that. And regardless of whether they actually move to traditional European countries, the 71 million new EU Turks would transform the Muslim population of the EU from 25 million to almost 100 million overnight, and with higher numbers comes lower assimilation into the host countries culture, helped along by the Turkish Prime Minister’s speech to 16,000 cheering Turks in Cologne, Germany, in February 2008, when he told them “assimilation is a crime against humanity.“ […]

War is one issue that Claeys and Dillen neglect to cover. Young Turkish males mired in grinding poverty would no doubt be attracted to the EU wages paid by the barely disguised future European army. Indeed, as the ratio of military age Turks is almost double that of the EU population, Europe could find itself with an army whose ranks contain a significant minority of Muslim soldiers. What would be the situation if the EU felt compelled to attack Iran, or the army was called in to put down Allahu-Akbaring adolescents in Andalucía, mutinous Muslims in Malmö or insurrectionary Islamists in Istanbul? The potential for inciting World War Three hardly bears thinking about. […] Paul Weston Reviews “A Bridge Too Far”

Børnetime i Paliland

To børn hvis mor sprængte sig selv i luften overværer her en genopførelse af forberedelserne, underlagt teatralsk musik. Klippet vil næppe blive set af folk som Mogens Lykketoft eller Margrete Auken, men mon ikke det i givet fald ville udløse den velkendte reaktion: Send flere penge derned? (LFPC)

To værktøjer i kassen

“Med pr-værktøj træder den muslimske  talsmand ind på gerningsstedet. Var den rettroende gerningsmand eller offer?”:

Boble 1: “Det er islamfjendsk at hævde, at forbrydelsen har noget med Islam at gøre”.  2) “Forbrydelsen afslører tyskernes islamfjendlighed.”

Og møllen maler: Bundesregierung verurteilt Dresdner Messerattacke,“Islamfeindlichkeit weit verbreitet”, “Weiße Rosen für Marwa” – Kundgebung vor dem Rathaus

Storbritanniens ikke så bløde totalitarisme

Jeg savner en kort og enkel forklaring på den engelske syge, hvis en sådan findes. Et land besat af tanken om at overvåge og kontrollere sine egne borgere, men ude af stand til at kontrollere den illegale indvandring, for ikke at tale om den undergravende virksomhed fra indvandrede mindretal. Denne beretning er ikke fra det hedengangne Sovjetunionen, men Storbritannien annus horribilis 2009. Via Gates of Vienna (LFPC):

[…] Until six weeks ago, Mr and Mrs Jones, as I must call them under reporting restrictions, lived happily with their three young children, two sons and a daughter, aged under 13. Mr Jones, a business consultant, is related to various European royal families and his brother is a senior Army officer seconded to the UN. If he has one weakness, as he admits, it is to refer to these connections, as he did to the heads of the schools attended by his two older children, saying that he was particularly concerned for their security. He asked that he could be allowed to drive into the school grounds when picking up his daughter, because he did not want to leave her waiting, potentially vulnerable, in the road outside.

The headmistress agreed to this, but, concerned about other children’s safety, contacted the local police, who in turn passed on their concerns to social services. The result of this was that, on May 18, when Mr and Mr Jones, accompanied by their younger son, arrived at school to pick up their daughter, they were met by a group of strangers, one as it turned out a female social worker. She asked, without explaining why or who she was, whether he was Mr Jones. When she three times refused to show him any ID, he was seized from behind by two policemen, handcuffed and put under arrest.

He was driven by a policeman to a nearby mental hospital where he was told that, because of “a number of concerns”, he was being detained under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act and “sectioned” under S.2 as of “unsound mind”. His wife, it turned out, had been similarly arrested, for loudly protesting at the handcuffing of her husband and the forcible seizing from her arms of her young son. The three children had been taken into care by social services. […] Is the state guilty of child kidnap?