Soon after the rollout two years ago of the experimental mRNA treatment intended to mitigate the effects of infection with the Wuhan Coronavirus, anecdotal reports began coming in of young athletes collapsing and dying on the playing field from unexpected heart attacks and other cardiac-related afflictions. Since then Iâve been waiting for rigorous statistical analyses of such events. Recently a slew of such studies has been published in the alternative media.
Terrifying statistics. The number of athletes who die suddenly has increased by 3,800%
64% of the athletes who had an accident on the sports field through December 31, 2022 died; the rest suffered severe disabilities. Statistics show that between 1980 and 2006, the average annual death rate among athletes was about 29 per year. From 2021 to the end of 2022, the average number of sudden deaths among young athletes has exploded, showing an increase of 3,800%.
The sudden death of athletes has already become the tragic normal, given the extremely high number of deaths. The International Olympic Committee in Lausanne, Switzerland, examined documents in international databases from 1966 to 2004. These documents show 1,101 sudden deaths in athletes under the age of 35, an average of 29 per year, with the sports with the highest incidence being football and basketball.
A study by Barry J. Maron of sudden deaths among US athletes in thirty-eight sports from 1980 to 2006 found 1,866 athlete deaths from heart disease, with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy being the most common, reports goodsciencing.com. The annual average is 29 deaths per year, i.e. 2.4 deaths per month. As of June 2021 there is no month with fewer than 29 such deaths/month (not per year) and December 2021 and January 2022 were months with 90 deaths each. Thatâs a percentage increase of 3,800%. Matt Le Tissier, a professional athlete with a 17-year career, and Gary Dempsey, a professional athlete with a 20-year career, said there have been no such incidents during their careers. The average age of those who died suddenly is around 26 years old, but many are only 20 or 21 years old. In Romania, the basketball player Alessia Raiciu died the night before her 18th birthday, but nobody in the medical world dares to link all these deaths to the Covid vaccine.
Correlation and Causality
In science, the connection between two events can be demonstrated in two ways. On the one hand, a direct causal connection between the two events can be established, on the other hand, a statistical correlation between the two events can be demonstrated, says citizen activist Aurelian Popa.
âIn Romania, but also worldwide, autopsies were banned during the pandemic, but even later, in vaccinated people, autopsies were dropped from standard medical practice because there was no desire to investigate the causal relationship between the vaccine and sudden death or serious side effects. And so, non-expert citizens are left with no choice but to examine the statistical correlation between the number of vaccinations and unexplained deaths or serious illnesses that occur out of the blue. Official statistics show that there is a double correlation. The explosion of serious illnesses and sudden deaths occurred after the start of the vaccination campaign, and the incidence of these adverse events is higher in countries with high immunization coverage and lower in countries with low immunization coverage. From this we can conclude that all this is related to the anti-Covid vaccination, even if medicine is not interested in it,â said the civil rights activist Aurelian Popa.
136 times higher risk of death
In Canada, 60 public health doctors have died after being vaccinated. In addition, official data from the U.S. Employment Agency shows another worrying correlation: since the third quarter of 2021, the proportion of those who acquire a disability has increased. âFor example, in the US workforce, aged between 18 and 64, it has increased more than 10% compared to the average in recent years. Worse still, mortality in the 0-14 age group increased in 2022. Experts from the Institute of Public Health in the UK have warned that vaccinated children are 137 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children,â added civil rights activist Aurelian Popa.
Afterword from the translator:
And still the vast majority, especially the Western world, are in utter denial and steadfastly refuse to acknowledge the facts staring at them through a skull in the face.
I wonder, is this a fault in Nature, that some people have a healthy suspicious mind, or is it something weâve been taught? Especially when so many who come out of the modern school system have become perfect little robots.
Not that this wasnât done before; just think of the different Christian churches with their iron fisted hold over the âtruthâ, and anyone stepping out of that narrative line stepped quickly onto a scaffold for wrong-think. They might not burn people at the stake anymore, or break them on the wheel, but they have their ways of burning and breaking those who do not follow the line.
Iâm already wondering when theyâll come knocking â with a battering ram â at my door?
********************’
Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Uncut News.
Note: There is an error in the statistical calculation in the third paragraph. It says that the âannual average is 29 deaths per yearâ between 1980 and 2006, yet the number of deaths listed for those years is 1866, which would make the average 69 (i.e. 1866 Ă· 27). â29â may be a typo.
Via Gates of Vienna
Se ogsÄ i dag Document.no
Det er sÄ endnu engang blevet bekrÊftet
at totalitĂŠr politik og ideologi ender i massedĂžd.
Ikke hver gang, men hver eneste gang! Kommunisme,
fascisme, islamisme, nazisme og radikal feminisme har i
alle de lande hvor de kom til magten, pÄfÞrt befolkningerne
et hav af ulykker og dĂždsfald. MĂ„ske vĂŠlgerne burde holde
op med at stĂžtte socialisterne og ekstremisterne, selvom
de camouflerer sig som folkevenner og sociale humanister.
Folket vil bedrages. Det dominerende narrativ kunne fĂžr i tiden rent faktisk vĂŠre sandheden. Nu er det, ligesom i en valgkamp, det narrativ der proppes flest penge i og som potentielt kan Ăžge profitabiliteten (antal vĂŠlgere) mest. Hvem formulerer det bedste narrativ, der kan maksimere antallet af stemmer mest muligt? Her har politikerne lĂŠrt af pressen (og isĂŠr af Goebbels)- hvad sĂŠlger bedst? Historier fra virkeligheden om ting, der fungerer og lykkes, eller katastrofehistorier om hypotetiske trusler mod “folkesundheden”, verdensfreden og jordkloden, hvor vi alle skal samles i en marcherende flok, der “gĂ„r samme vej” og “viser samfundssind” og kan… Read more »
Jeg ved ikke om de ligefrem VIL bedrages, men nogle har sagt til mig: “Ved du hvad, jeg er vaccineret tre gange, og jeg har overhovedet ikke lyst til at hĂžre fakta om vaccinerne”
Og det tror jeg dÊkker rigtig mange af de 80 procent, som er blevet bedraget. De er forstÄeligt nok bange for deres liv og helbred, og det forstÄr jeg. Men det er ikke dem alle, der forstÄr, at det jeg laver ikke er for at genere dem, men for at fÄ vaccineringen til at stoppe
…at fĂ„ vaccineringen til at stoppe…, det er ogsĂ„ den jeg har svĂŠrt ved , at fĂ„ bragt igennem . Men det er da underligt . Hvorfor skulle jeg vĂŠre interreseret i , at “hĂ„ne” eller ,at fĂ„ den vaccineret til at fĂžle sig dum/ utilstrĂŠkkelig eller lign? Det mĂ„ jo netop dreje sog om , at fĂ„ det STOPPET injektionerne. DernĂŠst at anerkende skaderne. Herunder , at de der gĂ„r med uroen for de ĂŠndringer de registrerer i deres helbred , kunne hĂŠnge sammen med sprĂžjterne. Men selvfĂžlgeligt er der ogsĂ„ det forhold , at se Ăžjnene hvad man… Read more »
Nej, det er ikke rationelt, men det er ogsÄ mit indtryk, at nogen er under et stort fÞlelsesmÊssigt pres ved tanken over, hvad de har fÄet. Nemlig de mere informerede og intelligente
SSI meddeler netop nu at der “observeres ikke lĂŠngere forhĂžjet dĂždelighed i nogen aldersgrupper” i Danmark.
https://www.ssi.dk/sygdomme-beredskab-og-forskning/sygdomsovervaagning/d/overvaagning-af-doedelighed
SĂ„ kan du sove roligt om natten BrostrĂžm. MĂ„ske.
Ja, det kan umuligt passe, nÄr den var astronomisk 12 februar. Tjek selv
https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus#explore-the-global-situation
Det er lidt teknisk, og jeg kender ikke noget nĂŠrmere til “teknikken”, men tallene for overdĂždeligheden i de seneste uger er altid forelĂžbige, og der er tydeligvis sket en nedjustering i tallene for en hĂ„ndfuld af de seneste uger.
Du vil sikkert kunne se ĂŠndringen afspejlet i dit link – om nogle uger.
Jeg fik ikke lĂŠst SSI’s meddelelse godt nok. De skriver “cpr-administrationen pr. den 10. januar 2023 har pĂ„begyndt maskinel registrering af dĂždsfald for personer uden bopĂŠl i Danmark og som er over 120 Ă„r.”
Det gĂžr CPR formentlig for at rense ud i deres register (som trĂŠnger til en fornyelse), men SSI har overset denne ĂŠndring og har nu korrigeret dĂždstallene fra 10/1 og senere relativt meget ned.
NÄr nu ordet parlament i sig selv betyder lÞgnagtig tale og vi ved at det stÊrkeste kort politikerne har er medierne, som er notorisk lodret lÞgnagtige i tredje potens af politikerne, som selv blot skal Äbne munden for at begynde at lyve og vi ved at statistikerne og opinionsbureauerne lever af de to andre gruppers bestillinger, hvad tror du sÄ selv?
Ino er fra venstreflĂžjen, og han forsvarer altid regeringen.
det udelukker ikke automatisk nogen
Typisk Ino kommentar. Alle hans kommentarer gÄr ud pÄ
at bagatellisere trusler mod danskerne. Han er nok fra
S, SF eller lignende.
Ino afslĂžret som vĂŠrende SĂžren BĂžsstrĂžm.
Men folket ved hvor han bor.
Slap nu af, Bent.