De vaccinerede havde en 14.5% højere dødelighed end de uvaccinerede

Jeg har ikke hørt en dansk politiker nævne ordet “vaccine” i over to år, og jeg tror ikke, det er mine ører, der fejler noget. Der er ikke noget emne, der er mere tabuiseret at tale sandhed om, ikke engang Ukraine. Og det eneste vi opnår ved ikke at gøre det, er at vi beskytter forbryderne.

En del af politikerne er ikke dummere end os andre, de ved godt, de har medvirket til at slå en masse mennesker ihjel. Formentlig og foreløbig omkring 20.000 danskere og godt 100.000 skadede og invaliderede. Det er sikkert lavt sat, når man tænker på, at Danmark i december 2021 havde 21% overdødelighed.

Er de nødt til at tale om det, har vi også i årevis kunne gætte os til, hvad de ville sige: “De døde af Covid-19” (som altså havde en dødelighed i promillerne, mindre end influenzas.) Nu er der videnskabelige tal på, hvor stor en løgn er er, at “vaccinerne reddede liv.” De kostede liv!

Here are the key points of this study:

6.08 million more deaths occurred in 2021 than in 2020, despite widespread COVID-19 vaccination.

Mortality rate among vaccinated individuals was 14.5% higher than among unvaccinated individuals.

If vaccines saved 14 million lives in 2021 as Watson et al claims, total deaths should have decreased, but instead, deaths increased.

Studies claiming vaccines saved lives rely on theoretical models, not direct statistical comparisons of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated mortality rates.

Negative correlation observed between vaccination rates and mortality in 37 countries.

Public health institutions refused to conduct proper comparisons of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated mortality rates.

Claims of lives saved by vaccination are based on assumptions, not statistical validation.
Set theory analysis suggests “saved lives” exist only in models, not in real-world mortality data.

Konklusion

Theoretical models of how many lives were saved with COVID-19 vaccination without statistical support have no scientific validity and represent a methodological fiasco of public health science. A rigorous and transparent approach to public health science is necessary to ensure that policies and medical interventions are guided by objective data rather than theoretical assumptions.

COVID Vaccine “Millions of Lives Saved” Myth Shattered by Real-World Data

Studiet er: The Discrepancy Between the Number of Saved Lives with COVID-19Vaccination and Statistics of Our World Data

Den inhalerbare vaccine snart færdigudviklet

Udvilkes for Bill Gates penge. Problemet er, at man nu ville kunne vaccinere folk imod deres vilje.

Scientists are advancing the development of a new “AeroVax” Covid mRNA “vaccine” that seeks to overcome the hesitancy of traditional shots among the general public by introducing needle-free vaccinations that are inhaled instead of injected.

[…]

However, concerns are growing that the AeroVax could be abused once it passes regulations.Many warn that it could be easily adpated to be sprayed into the atomphere. As such, it could be used to “vaccinate” people against their will.

Researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded McMaster University in Canada have launched a phase-2 clinical trial for their inhaled Covid “vaccine.” The new “vaccine” is atomized into a spray mist and inhaled rather than injected using needles.

mRNA causes deaths to skyrocket

The news comes after Canada recently admitted that mRNA “vaccines” have triggered a major death surge among the public.As Slay News reported, the Canadian government admitted that Covid mRNA “booster” shots caused deaths to skyrocket among people who received the “vaccines. DISTURBING: Scientists Advance New AeroVax Needle-Free Covid mRNA ‘Vaccine’