11
apr
Seneste opdatering: 11/4-13 kl. 1424
10 kommentarer - Tryk for at kommentere!

homophobia

A man in Paris, France was reportedly beaten for walking arm in arm with his boyfriend Olivier early Sunday morning. Wilfred de Bruijn, a French resident, says he was assaulted while walking in Paris’ 19th arrondissement. De Bruijn was beaten unconscious near his home early Sunday sustaining five fractures in his head and face, fractured pieces of bone in his skull.and a lost tooth. His boyfriend, who was also beaten up, said he witnessed three to four men shouting “Hey, look they’re gays.”

He posted a photo of his wounds on his Facebook page with the caption “Sorry to show you this. It’s the face of homophobia”. Paris beating gives a face to homophobia, Photo of Gay Man Who Walked Through Muslim Suburb of Paris With Boyfriend Causes Shock, Wilfred de Bruijn, French Gay Attack Victim, Becomes Cause Celebre

Jeg har skiftet ‘homophobia’ ud med ‘hate’, hvorfor psykologisere had og overlagt vold? Det lugter af indlevelse og undskyldning, skrot de fobi-udtryk! Gerningmændene er ikke fanget, men findes på video. Franske medier kobler det sammen med de store demonstrationer mod homoægteskaber. 19 arondissement er tungt befolket af indvandrere fra Nordafrika, så der er som en af artiklerne antyder også andre mulige motiver, nemlig dem en god Radikal ikke taler om. 19 er ikke en forstad, men lige inden for Boulevard Périphérique. de Bruijn har stillet op i TV med sit smadrede hoved – video, fransk, utekstet.

Dalrymple: Thatcher, the greatest reformer in Argentinian history

Vi har set den afstumpede pøbel hvortil slynglen George Gallloway hører, og vi har set panegryrikken. Her er nuancer, indsigt og humor:

Such was the force of her personality that, according to a paper published in the British Medical Journal in 1985, she was able to impress herself even upon the memory of people suffering from Alzheimer’s disease.

In foreign affairs she was partly successful. She did nothing to halt the European juggernaut with its preposterously square wheels; but she played a major role in ending the Cold War and she was undoubtedly the greatest reformer in Argentinian history, destroying the political influence of the military in that country for a long time to come, if not for ever. It is unlikely, however, that many statues of her will be erected to her in gratitude in that country.

Strident in rhetoric but timid in practice where it mattered most, Mrs Thatcher managed to discredit in the minds of many the very necessary reforms that never took place. Her memory, hated by many, thus stands in the way of real change.

For all that, however, she was undoubtedly a towering figure. Personally she was far more charming than most people would have suspected. If her rhetoric provoked disproportionate hatred, it at least raised important questions and awoke many from their mental slumbers. For a time she restored faith that decline was not inevitable. But one of the lessons of her life is that one person in a democracy, however remarkable, cannot singlehandedly change a nation. We in Britain are firmly back to square one, with a public sector proportionately larger than when she came to power 34 years ago.

Grammar schools existed in all areas, and selected the children, about 10 per cent, who were most gifted academically (Mrs Thatcher had attended one herself). They had high standards and virtually guaranteed the social ascension of the children of the poor who went to them. Their closure, in which Mrs Thatcher played the very important role of non-resistance, was an educational, social and cultural disaster: educational because academic standards quickly fell; social because grammar schools were the most visible institutions of elitism based upon ability rather than social exclusivity, whose closure helped to turn a class into a caste society; and cultural because their closure symbolized a loss of faith in the idea of higher and lower cultures, the latter soon triumphing over and swamping the former. Liberty and Law

Det skal tilføjes, at Thatcher ramte nogle rene toner efter 9/11:

By then she was called Lady Thatcher, and she wrote an op-ed article that was published in the New York Times on February 11, 2002 a few months after the Sept. 11th attacks. The title of the piece was, Advice to a Superpower. She was characteristically direct describing the ideology behind the attacks and the on-going threat. Her words from that article will probably not be highlighted in the media today—likely not even mentioned. But her focus on the Islamist threat drew a clear, unmistakable warning from the past. Thatcher wrote:

Perhaps the best parallel is with early communism. Islamic extremism today, like bolshevism in the past, is an armed doctrine. It is an aggressive ideology promoted by fanatical, well-armed devotees. And, like communism, it requires an all-embracing long-term strategy to defeat it. Townhall

Annoncer fra Danske Partner-Ads:


Donér engangsbeløb?Kan du forpligte dig til fast betaling?

  • Peter Buch

    Tag altid dr. Bachs Rescue cream og team med i byen.
    Udenfor perimeteren er livsfarligt.

    • indenfor – nabo til Goutte d’ Or, også tungt arabiseret.

      • Anonym

        For uklart, beklager.
        Perimeteren her at forstå som steder hvor dr. Bachs folk -en for indforstået betegnelse for vestlig/fransk sækulær myndighed er “styrende”, ikke lokaliteten i Paris, dr. Bachs hudmiddel at forstå som det hudmiddel det er
        bachflower.com/rescue-remedy-information/
        This mix was created by Dr Bach to deal with emergencies and crises – the moments when there is no time to make a proper individual selection of remedies. It can be used to help us get through any stressful situations, from last-minute exam or interview nerves, to the aftermath of an accident or bad news. Rescue Remedy helps us relax, get focused and get the needed calmness.
        http://www.directlyfromnature.com/Original_Bach_Rescue_Remedy_s/1814.h tm dels

      • Peter Buch

        For uklart, beklager.
        Perimeteren her at forstå som steder hvor dr. Bachs folk -en af mig lavet alt for indforstået betegnelse for vestlig/fransk sækulær myndighed er “styrende”, ikke lokaliteten i Paris, dr. Bachs hudmiddel at forstå som det hudmiddel det er
        bachflower.com/rescue-remedy-information/
        This mix was created by Dr Bach to deal with emergencies and crises – the moments when there is no time to make a proper individual selection of remedies. It can be used to help us get through any stressful situations, from last-minute exam or interview nerves, to the aftermath of an accident or bad news. Rescue Remedy helps us relax, get focused and get the needed calmness.
        http://www.directlyfromnature.com/Original_Bach_Rescue_Remedy_s/1814.h tm dels

  • Pingback: »Here is the face of homophobia« « Snaphanen | dkbeep : Indvandringens Pris()

  • Da Capo

    Nedan citeras en väsentlig kommentar till Dalrymples originalartikel.
    – – – – –
    One Comment by R Richard Schweitzer
    Apr 10, 2013 @ 11:23:05

    Dr. Dalrymple points out what is a continuing critical issue for liberty in both Britain and the United States: “Her error in part was to have failed to recognize the ***change in the character*** of the British people.
    She imagined them as they were in pre-war Grantham, the small Lincolnshire town where she was born: honest, prudent, modest, striving, thrifty, virtuous, duty-bound and patriotic. The intervening years, however, had ”’changed their character***; they, or *many of them,* had become very nearly the opposite of all those things.”

    This vital issue is also raised in the colloquy between Nicholas Eberstadt and Yuval Levin in Eberstadt’s “A Nation of Takers.” The correlation of the transformation of governments with the “transformation of the sorts of citizens we are,” is quite clear. It is not too much of a stretch to interpret those words as “transformation of the *characteristics* of members of segments of our civil society.”

    If we are to be concerned with the issues of individual liberty, we will have to deal with the question of whether a vacuum created by those *changing characteristics* has drawn governmental functions into replacement of civil facilities; or, whether pressures of expansion of governmental functions in response to those interests seeking to use the mechanisms of government for ideological, economic or political objectives, have pushed government into the civic space; or, whether we can determine which of the transformations may be the cause of the other. The critical point being that in the political discussions there is still little or no reference to, or observation of, those changes in, or transformations of, the motivations of large segments of the members of our civil society.

    Charles Murray’s “Coming Apart,” also considers changes that have occurred in the characteristics and motivations of the members of our civil society. Like the good doctor’s reference, he points to the need for recognizing and examining the segmentation of those motivations, and the transformation of motivations, in differing parts, or “levels,” of our civil society.
    – – – – – –

    Sett över en livstid har uppenbarligen också den svenska befolkningen ändrat karaktär. Se vidare: “Den hellige vej: Landet uden ledelse” http://snaphanen.dk/2013/04/07/sverige-fran-hogtillit-till-lagtillit/.
    Också [Nu hedder frikirken ‘universiteter’(google!)]

    Jonas Hassen Khemiri, som önskade byta skinn med den svenska justitiministern Beatrice Ask för en dag, har utifrån egna upplevelser men oförmögen (och ointresserad av) att ställa sig frågorna HUR och VARFÖR, skildrat detta förändrade Sverige, det Nya Sverige, det SLÖDDERiserade Sverige, som är resultat av ett naivt lands oförmåga att svälja vad det gapat över. Man ville ju så väl, men förstod sig inte på motsatsparet AKTION – REAKTION.

    Khemiri skriver: “…när du kommer ut på gatan, ned i tunnelbanan, in i köpcentret och ser polismännen stå där, med Lagen på sin sida, med rätten att närma sig dig och be dig bevisa din oskuld så väcker det minnen till liv.”
    […]
    “Att vara åtta och kolla på actionfilmer där mörka män våldtar, svär gutturalt, slår sina kvinnor, kidnappar sina barn, manipulerar och ljuger och rånar och misshandlar.
    […]
    “Att vara sexton, nitton, tjugo, trettiotvå och se samma pappfigurer återanvändas igen och igen.”
    …och så vidare…..
    – – – – –
    http://www.dn.se/kultur-noje/basta-beatrice-ask

  • Jonny

    Wilfred de Bruijn kopplar också samman attacken med kampanjen mot “homoäktenskap”. Det verkar som om han använder sig av en “Breivik”-anklagelse. Smutsigt!

    “I certainly feel there’s been an increase in homophobia,” De Bruijn told The Associated Press at his apartment in Paris’ working class 19th district, where the attack took place.

    “What (the anti-gay marriage campaign) are saying is that they’re not homophobic: lesbians and gays are nice people, but don’t let them get close to children – that’s very dangerous. It’s OK for them to live together, but not like other couples with the same protection because it’s not really the same thing,” De Bruijn said.

    “These people are all professionals of the spoken word. They know very well what can happen if you repeat, repeat, repeat that these people are lower human beings. Of course it will have a result.”

    “It was not Frigide Barjot who was hitting my head, or the bishop of Avignon lurking in that street to attack us,” he said. “But they are responsible.”

    ht tp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/wilfred-de-bruijn-france-gay-at tack-_n_3055836.html

    • Det plejer at gå sive ud efter nogle dage. Hvis man kender lidt til parisernes afslappede forhold til seksuelle speicaliteter, er den forklaring han og medierne giver der usandsynlig. Jeg giver den 10 % chance for at holde i virkeligheden. Mon ikke man skal sige:

      Går katolikker lige fra demonstrationer mod homoægtesdkaber over og lemlæster bøsser i en af verdens sex-liberaleste by gennem 100 år ?

      Mon ikke man skal være journalist, for at tro på det ?

  • Pingback: Hvem overfaldt Wilfred de Bruijn? « Snaphanen()

  • Pingback: »Here is the face of homohatred – again« « Snaphanen()