Tarek Abdol Hamid:  tre domme  på  kun fem år, seneste  i 2006, det nye i historien er det hidtil hemmeligholdte  navn.  Broder Tarek optræder  første  gang i aviserne som 18 årig i juni 1999:

Tarek Abdol-Hamid gik amok, da han på et diskotek blev afvist af en ung, smuk kvinde. Venstrefløjspolitikeren og kvindesagsforkæmperen Asmaa Abdol-Hamid har en bror, som mener, at kvinder skal slås ned, hvis de afviser en mands tilnærmelser.  […]  Episoden udviklede sig til en regulær voldssag. Ifølge domsudskrifterne fra sagen skete der følgende: På diskoteket lægger Tarek an på den unge model ved at gribe hende om taljen og tage hende på brysterne. Hun afviser ham blankt ved at skubbe ham væk. I første omgang bliver dette mødt med et vredesudbrud fra Tarek, hvor han kalder hende ”fucking luder” og ”kælling”. [..]

Efter det voldsomme optrin forlader pigen, der hedder Sofie i hast diskoteket sammen med sin veninde. Men Tarek følger efter. – “Jeg kender nogle mennesker i Odense. Bare vent, din familie skal dø”, lyder det fra den forsmåede bejler, som løber op til den skræmte model og skriger hende ind i ansigtet.   Skrigeriet efterfølges af et skub, der sender Sofie i asfalten.
Hun rammer jorden hårdt, slår hovedet og besvimer, hvilket dog ikke forhindrer Tarek i at slå hende i ansigtet og sparke hende i maven.  Episoden koster Abdol-Hamid seks måneder i fængsel – hans tredje dom siden 2003. Tarek Abdol-Hamid er tidligere straffet for bl.a. vold, tyveri og trusler på livet.

SE og HØR : Asmaa Abdol-Hamid: Bror dømt for kvindevold og det meste  af dagspressen, der dog udelader  dødstrusler og  tidligere domme.” Ja så forstår man jo bedre, at hun ikke vil røre mænd” , skriver en kommentator med  ubønhørlig logik.

Kristeligt  brødnid

Som bekendt appelerer Sverigedemokraterne  især til KD vælgere. Den trussel imødegås iklædt en moralsk camouflage, men før de for alvor tager  SAP vælgere, bliver de  aldrig en faktor af betydning. og deres indtog i Riksdagen vil under  alle omstændigheder være mere end et årti for sent til at forhindre  kronisk instabilitet:

Kristdemokraternas Göran Hägglund gick till hårt angrepp mot Sverigedemokraterna i sitt tal i Almedalen i dag.
– Sverigedemokraterna har tydliga främlingsfientliga drag. Partiet försöker nu att bli rumsrent och salongsfähigt genom att nödtorftigt skyla den bruna färgen, sade Göran Hägglund inför runt 1 500 åhörare. – Det var inte många år sedan medlemmar i just det partiet dök upp i naziuniform och gjorde hitlerhälsning på partimöten.

Hägglund angrep Sverigedemokrater – han kaldes i AB  “2 generationsindvandrer fra Finland” (!) og her  udtaler  han de manende  ord :  “”Jag vill inte se det partiet i riksdagen”. Mon han kan tåle at blive  citeret om fem år, eller er det bare ligegyldigt, fordi han er røget samme  vej som danske kristelige politikere?

“Muslim politics are conducted in Europe by Europeans themselves, based on the interests of Muslim lobbyists”

Historikeren Bat Ye’or er enestående som bindeled mellem Gamle Europa og Israel, den vestlige udpost i en ørken af barbari. Som sådan burde hun have vestlige politikere og akademikeres fulde opmærksomhed, men som det fremgår af interviewet fra Jerusalem Post, er netop disse to områder, politik og læreanstalterne, selve det hovedproblem hun udpeger her. For os i blogverdenen er hun en uvurderlig ressource, mens hendes potentiale i vores eliter næppe er stort – hun tilhører ikke en anerkendt offergruppe, og hendes konklusioner bliver afvist alene fordi de er skræmmende og ikke relativiserende. Mens en Jacob Mchangama kan vrisse hånligt – men indholdsløst – af Lars Hedegaards henvisninger til parallellerne mellem islam og fascismen og nazismen, så har Bat Ye’or under sin opvækst i Egypten selv erfaret slægtsskabet (LFPC).    (foto © Snaphanen)  Jerusalem Post, 9 juli 2008:

[…] Why did your family leave Egypt?

We left as part of the big exodus of Jews from Arab-Muslim countries. Jews suffered from severe anti-Semitism, especially in Egypt. There was a powerful Nazi community, established by [then Egyptian president Gamal Abdel] Nasser. There were many anti-Jewish laws. There was a general feeling of insecurity. There was open hatred expressed by the Muslim Brotherhood, especially in relation to the Palestine issue. As early as World War II – particularly after the November 1945 pogroms in Egypt – Jews began leaving the country. Many went to Israel. At that time there was a Zionist underground. Zionism was made a criminal offense for which you could be jailed or even tortured. So, many young people left. For the old people, of course, it was difficult, because many were members of the bourgeoisie, and it was forbidden for Jews to take any money or assets out of the country when they left. My parents’ assets were confiscated, for example, which created economic problems for our family.

Are you saying that as World War II ended, and in Europe Nazism became taboo, it was gaining strength in the Arab world?

Yes, but even before and throughout the war, both Nazism and fascism were strong in the Arab world. Hitler and Mussolini were heroes. The whole Middle East was in turmoil because the Arab-Muslim populations were all favorable to Nazism and anti-Semitic policies. […]

As for OIC [the Organization of the Islamic Conference] influence on Europe: It is visible in immigration policy toward Muslims, and in the Muslims’ refusal to integrate into European societies.

The OIC considers nationalist-European movements, European history, European culture, European religions and European languages as Islamophobic. Why? Because Europeans have begun to feel that they are losing their own identity, due to their efforts to welcome immigrants who don’t want to integrate. As a result, they have adopted measures to stop illegal immigration, to control legal immigration and to curb terrorism. Europeans fear losing their historical and cultural assets – particularly those of democracy and human rights – to Shari’a law. They want one law for everybody – and it’s not Shari’a, which involves things like honor killings. It is thus that in all international forums, the OIC attacks Europe and demands that it apply multiculturalism.

Now, Europeans do not want multiculturalism. But this is a problem, because European governments – and especially the European Union – do not want to fight the OIC, and so they collaborate with it. Therefore, what we have inside Europe is a clash of interests between the European citizens and their governments. […]

European countries are becoming dhimmi countries, and people don’t realize it, because they don’t know what jihad and dhimmitude are, so they don’t recognize what condition they’re in. When you have an illness, but are unfamiliar with its symptoms, you don’t know that you are sick. You feel sick, but you don’t know what you’ve got. You therefore can’t make a diagnosis or embark upon a method of treatment to cure yourself. This is the current condition of Western civilization right now. […]

Is it possible that by virtue of their numbers, Muslims in Europe are influencing policy – and that it is not just due to the power of the OIC?

Yes, but you have to understand that those who plan policy are Europeans. In other words, Muslim politics are conducted in Europe by Europeans themselves, based on the interests of Muslim lobbyists.

Isn’t Eastern Europe different from Western Europe in this respect?

Yes, and Eastern Europe is more pro-American than Western Europe – which is what the Muslims want. It is easier to take over the West as a whole when it’s divided.

How has this affected European academia?

European universities – like those in America – are totally controlled by the Arab-Islamic lobby, as are the schools. A teacher who attempts to teach according to the European view of history is thrown out.

Ruthie Blum: One on One: A ‘dhimmi’ view of Europe