Farlig terrorgruppe hverver unge i Bazar Vest, Terror-hvervning ender hos justitsministeren. Venstres Karen Jespersen reagerer.Se også Al-Shabaab truer Kurt Westergaard, Svensk Al-Shabaab medlem truer Lars Vilks.2009: Selvmordsbomber var dansk-somalier. og al-Shabab värvar unga män i Sverige. Al-Shabab betyder “ungdommens parti” eller “Movement of Striving Youth” / Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen.

Danske mediers dæmonisering af Israel (fortsat)

Måske det nærmeste man kommer til en rygende pistol i dette lille uvidenskabelige survey er det der viser sig når man kigger på begreber som agens og antropomorfisering.

Eksempler som “Israel dræber Hamas-leder” hvor Israel gøres til handlende subjekt skal selvfølgelig skelnes fra andre søgeresultater som “En eksplosion uden for et bilmarked i byen Muqdadiyah i det centrale Irak dræber…”. Her er “Irak” ikke subjekt for “dræber”, og disse eksempler må sorteres fra i denne oversigt. Bemærk til gengæld agensforskydningen her: I så godt som samtlige søgeresultater af denne type på Infomedia er der ingen menneskelig ansvarlig bag – “vejsidebombe i Irak dræber”, “selvmordsbombe i Irak dræber”, osv. Blandt undtagelserne finder man dog – Israel. Her er der pludselig et nationalt ophav:

Israelsk luftangreb i det sydlige Libanon dræber tre libanesiske soldater

Israelsk-plantet bombe i Libanon dræber fem militsfolk

Antropomorfisering betyder at tillægge ikkemenneskelige instanser menneskelige kvaliteter. Jeg fandt for samtlige arabiske nabolande til Israel siger og skriver kun tre eksempler med en antropomorfiseret stat som handlende subjekt med “dræber” umiddelbart efterfølgende:

“Kurdere: Irak dræber desertører”

“The Times: Irak dræber kurdere i..”

“Syrien dræber stadig sine modstandere i Libanon”

Tre eksempler på antropomorfiseret stat der “dræber”, for den omgivende arabiske verden – hvordan ser det så ud for lille Israels vedkommende? Tja, i går gav “Israel dræber” 687 hits på Infomedia. I dag er tallet vokset til 724 hits. Kigger man så på disse får man et ganske andet resultat end for den arabiske verdens vedkommende – her er der antropomorfiseret og dermed dæmoniseret over hele linjen:

“Israel dræber 11 palæstinensere på et døgn”, “Israel dræber palæstinenser i Nord-Gaza”, “Kampfly-angreb: Israel dræber ledende Hamas-medlem”, “Israel dræber fire palæstinensere ved Gaza”, “Israel dræber nødhjælpsaktivister i blodigt angreb ud for Gaza”, “NABLUS: Israel dræber seks palæstinensere”, “Israel dræber egne soldater”, og måske den mest infame “Israel dræber mor og fire småbørn”.

Jeg har i skrivende stund ikke fundet ét eksempel hvor Israel ikke er subjekt, agent og antropomorfiseret aktør, og jeg har trawlet en tredjedel af de 724 søgeresultater igennem. Man får unægteligt lyst til at antropomorfisere de danske mainstreammedier efter denne forstemmende afdækning: Danske nyhedsmedier hetzer mod Israel og gøder bunden for regulært jødehad. Hvem vil dog betale for dette snavs? (LFPC)

Elfenbenskysten – et afrikansk Kosovo?

Hvad handler den konflikt egentlig  om ? Et fikset præsidentvalg ? Selvom den er i hver eneste nyhedsudsendelse på TV og radio i her Sverige, er dens indhold ikke gået op for mig. Den første antydning af dybere konfliktstof fra en dansk MSM avis, var i Jyllands Posten den 4 april:

Tusinder af muslimske indvandrere fra lande som Mali og Burkina Faso er de seneste år flyttet til Elfenbenskysten, fordi levestandarden er højere end i nabolandene.Befolkningen i den nordlige del af landet, som har samme baggrund som tilflytterne, er derfor blevet styrket, mens befolkningen mod syd er begyndt at reagere mod indvandringen, som ifølge dem truer landet.

Det eneste andet danske hit på Infomediasøgningen “Elfenbenskysten, islam” de sidste 30 dage, er Kristeligt Dagblad den 8 april: “Amerikanske kristne forsvarer Elfenbenkystens præsident. Gbagbo er et bolværk mod udbredelsen af islam, lyder det fra amerikanske højrekristne.” Højrekristne ? Der er massakrer på kristne i landet. I dag måtte jeg så lede lidt grundigere, og jeg måtte til tidsskrifter for at finde baggrundsartikler og til videos og blogs, og nu toner et billede frem, der giver mindelser om det vi så NATO og Vesten mod de kristne i Balkans religionskrig. For en generation siden var der 20 % muslimer i landet, i dag er det 50 %. Hvis Elfenbenskysten er Kosovo om igen, og vi er vidne til en islamisk magtovertagelse, hvorfor ignorerer MSM så det aspekt fuldstændigt? Her er et koncentrat af, hvad jeg fandt på blandt andre Frontpage Mag og WorldNetDaily, decideret konservative men seriøse tidsskifter.:

The crisis in the Ivory Coast has important lessons for Europe, Israel and the United States. And none of these lessons is being conveyed by the Western media.

The most important aspects of the crisis in the Ivory Coast are being overlooked or deliberately disguised by the Western media. One can read media report after media report without discovering the basic fact that the Northern Ivory Coast “rebels” are Muslims. Indeed they are Muslims who by and large entered the Ivory Coast as infiltrators, through borders that are poorly patrolled, from neighboring countries. A better advertisement for stronger border control cannot be found. At least four million illegal immigrants, mostly Muslim, entered the Ivory Coast during the past two decades, tilting the demographic balance there.

And these Muslim infiltrators and interlopers, increasingly backed by African, French and Western powers, are challenging the control by Ivory Coast natives over their own country. The sufferings and violence in the Ivory Coast may well illustrate what awaits Europe if it continues its own demographic suicide and if it continues to flood itself with Muslim immigrants.[..]

The background to the civil war and the current constitutional crisis is the massive in-migration of Muslims from the countries neighboring the Ivory Coast, mainly from Burkina Faso. The infiltrators settled in the northern half of the country, and also in pockets in the south, including in some neighborhoods inside the country’s largest city, Abidjan. Today Muslims, including illegals, are almost 40% of the population of the country (although Muslim and other sources claim they are really considerably higher), the remainder being a mixture of Christians (mainly Roman Catholics) and animists.Lessons from the Ivory Coast, (Muslims rape, burn Christians alive. Catholic Church reports mass murder in Cote d’Ivoire.Vidéo: Les hommes d’Alassane OUATTARA ont brûlé des personnes vivantes en Côte-d’Ivoire (advarsel, grafisk) Islamic takeover of Ivory coast imminent, Islam in Côte d’Ivoire.)

Og grundig baggrund på Sultan Knish:

“There is a civil war in the Ivory Coast between Muslims and Christians. Unsurprisingly the EU has chosen to back the Muslim side. France is using armed force to insure that the Muslims take over.

Islam came to the Ivory Coast via Berber slave traders. Now it is trying to take over with mass murder and the backing of the ‘international community’. The post-colonial Ivory Coast was a success story. But Muslim immigration has turned it into a nightmare.

The media narrative on the Cote D’Ivorie crisis is that Muslim thug Alassane Ouattarra is the legitimately elected leader of the country. But Alassane Ouattarra had a Birther problem of his own. Under Ivory Coast law, the president and his parents have to be native born. Alassane Ouattarra was born in the Ivory Coast, but his father wasn’t. That legally disqualified him from holding office. He tried for it anyway despite a Supreme Court ruling barring him.

Ouattarra tried to present forged documents, resulting in a warrant for his arrest. He ran for office yet again. But this time he brought large numbers of Muslim immigrants who were not legally qualified to vote to the polls. Numerically he won, but the invalid votes were thrown out by the Constitutional Council. The ‘international community’ chose to back Ouattarra, who had no legal right to even stand for office, and his illegal Muslim voters. Now they’re doing everything possible to put him in power.

Let’s be clear about what is going on here. Gbago is no saint– few African leaders are. But Alassane Ouattarra and his Muslim thugs are trying to turn the Ivory Coast into another Sudan filled with the bodies of Christians and Animists. Backing an Ouattarra takeover means backing another Muslim genocide against Christians and Animists.

The Obama Administration has pushed for the replacement of Gbago with Ouattarra. The UN has used mostly unproven war crimes allegations, that smack of events in Yugoslavia, to conduct a war to put Ouattarra and his Muslim thugs in power. Meanwhile the UN did not intervene military when Muslims were engaged in genocide in Sudan. UN peacekeepers serve as Ouattara’s private bodyguard.

Despite all the lies about acting on behalf of Ivorians– the UN is acting on behalf of Muslims. On behalf of Ouattara and the Muslim immigrants drawn by the wealth of Côte d’Ivoire.

The numbers tell the tale. In 1957, Muslims barely made up 20 percent of the country. In the 90’s, they were already half the country. The boom has come from migrant workers. Many of whom were enlisted to vote for Ouattara.

This civil war hinges on the question of whether Muslim immigrants should be allowed to take over the Côte d’Ivoire. The UN says yes. Obama says yes. France says yes. But this is a preview of coming attractions for Europe and America as well.”

forts……… Sultan Knish