Hør Google whistlebloweren Zack Voorhees om hvordan det har været at afsløre verdenshistoriens mægtigste firma, deres politiske manipulation og deres samarbejde med kinesisk militær. T-shirt Goolag kan købes her. Den med Stalin er heller ikke værst.

The Coming Migration out of Sub-Saharan Africa

There are a billion more where those came from

Christopher Caldwell skabte sig et solidt navn i 2000 tallet med blandt andet Reflections on the Revolution In Europe (2009). Han analyserer her det faktum, at næsten ingen i Europa vil beskæftige sig med det faktum, at Afrika er ved at eksplodere op i deres hoveder, og at demografiske beslutninger man tager for sent, kunne man lige så godt have undladt at tage.

Vi ser det med al tydelighed i Sverige: Demografien har taget taget magten fra politikken, EU der analyserer alt, nægter at drage de konklusioner der kunne sikre, at Europa overlever hovedsageligt fordi det kolliderer med den globalistiske pengemagts ideologi. Vi “løser ikke problemerne i fælleskab,” som det lyder fra liberale og socialistiske flum-politikere, EU agter kun at forværre dem.

Man må se på, hvad EU gør, ikke hvad de siger. Hvis man ikke forstår, at EU ønsker nationer og folkestyrer opløst, giver deres handlinger ingen mening. I Islam og klansamfundet har de fundet det perfekte, sociale opløsningsmiddel. Europa fortsætter derfor ud af en blind vej, der uvægerligt slutter i et kaos efter hvad man burde kalde “Den Svenske Model.” “Fredsprojektet” EU vil ende med at skabe en krig, der vil få os til at forbløde indefra: Borgerkrig. Et par pluk:

If Rome and Berlin have been transfixed by a nautical incident involving only a few dozen African seafarers, it is for a simple reason: There are a billion more where those came from. And how Europe addresses African migration is going to determine what the population of the continent looks like a generation from now.

That is only the beginning of the problem. The population pressures emanating from the Middle East in recent decades, already sufficient to drive the European political system into convulsions, are going to pale beside those from sub-Saharan Africa in decades to come. Salvini owes his rise — and his party’s mighty victory in May’s elections to the European Union parliament — to his willingness to address African migration as a crisis. Even mentioning it makes him almost alone among European politicians. Those who are not scared to face the problem are scared to avow their conclusions.

Last year Stephen Smith, an American-born longtime Africa correspondent for the Paris dailies Le Monde and Libération, now a professor of African and African-American studies at Duke, published (in French) La ruée vers l’Europe, a short, sober, open-minded book about the coming mass migration out of Africa. The most important book written until then on the subject, it quickly became the talk of Paris. It has now been published in English.

The migration policy of the European Union is an exorbitant mistake

If Smith is right about this (and the research of Oxford development economist Paul Collier indicates that he is), then the consensus migration policy of the European Union is an exorbitant mistake. It is based on “co-development” — subsidizing industry and employment in source countries in order to reduce the incentive to leave. It may help Africa. But it heightens, rather than dampens, the migration pressures on Europe.

The most serious heresy in Smith’s book is this: The extraordinarily disruptive mass movement of labor and humanity from Africa to Europe, should it come, will bring Europe no meaningful benefits. Narratives of Europe’s enrichment by migration are post facto rationalizations for something that Europe is undergoing, not choosing. Europe does not need an influx of youthful African labor, Smith writes, because both robotization and rising retirement ages are shrinking the demand for it. The Coming Migration out of Sub-Saharan Africa